Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <h...@debian.org> writes: > On Sat, 25 Apr 2009, Michal ??iha?? wrote: >> Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> napsal(a):
>>> Like lintian, your list falsely includes packages that use cdbs to build, >>> which automatically updates config.{sub,guess}. >> If you don't build depend on autotools-dev, nothing can be updated >> (at least it was case for my package which uses dh). > If you reautotoolize at build time, I believe automake does depend on > autotools-dev and gives you updated files. You don't necessarily have > to build-depend on autotools-dev. > And pure autoconf doesn't need config.sub/guess. I don't recall if it can > even use them, or if you need macros that come with automake for that > though. If you build-depend on any of: autotools-dev automake automaken automake1.4 automake1.7 automake1.8 automake1.9 automake1.10 Lintian assumes that you're going to fix config.{sub,guess} at build time and doesn't complain. cdbs doesn't depend on any of those. A simple build dependency on cdbs therefore isn't sufficient to update those files. You have to add an additional build dependency on one of those packages or config.{sub,guess} won't be updated on a buildd that doesn't install recommends. I don't think there's any problem with Lintian here. I think there are some buggy CDBS packages where the maintainer thought they were getting auto-update because they were installing packages with aptitude and hence getting recommends, but that doesn't work on the buildds. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org