Re: Orphaned packages in testing which were never in stable

2002-04-12 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hi On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 11:53:00AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote: > On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 01:08:10AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > I have this sneaking suspicion that we need a tool more appropriate than > > the BTS to handle the WNPP. The BTS seems rather fragile for this > > purpose - the form

Re: Orphaned packages in testing which were never in stable

2002-04-08 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* Michael Stone | On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 01:08:10AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: | > I have this sneaking suspicion that we need a tool more appropriate than | > the BTS to handle the WNPP. The BTS seems rather fragile for this | > purpose - the format for bug titles and to a greater extent the way

Re: Orphaned packages in testing which were never in stable

2002-04-08 Thread Michael Stone
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 01:08:10AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > I have this sneaking suspicion that we need a tool more appropriate than > the BTS to handle the WNPP. The BTS seems rather fragile for this > purpose - the format for bug titles and to a greater extent the way > followups for bug repor

Re: Orphaned packages in testing which were never in stable

2002-04-07 Thread Mark Brown
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 10:05:07PM +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote: > Chris Cheney indends to adopt the package, yes, but he only mailed > to [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of properly renaming the bug to ITA. I have this sneaking suspicion that we need a tool more appropriate than the BTS to handle the WNPP