* Oliver Kurth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-11-22 23:54]:
> My status seems to be reset :-(. I had passed all checks, and was
> approved by my AM.
The status information should be correct now.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 11:13:00PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-11-22 21:52]:
> > Since satie.d.o has been destroyed, where does this leave the NM process?
>
> I tried adding all applicants again. I have probably missed some, but
> most should be the
* Mateusz Papiernik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-11-22 23:23]:
> > http://nm.debian.org/amstatus.php?&user=me%40andrew.net.au Just like
> that's not working, it tells "You should not be here!!" :)
Sorry, http://nm.debian.org/nmstatus.php?email=me%40andrew.net.au
> But I entered nm.debian.org, and
> Tasks and skills has been checked (my package is rust), and there was
> AM report for me too, so I'm only waiting for DAM approval.
...
http://lists.debian.org/debian-newmaint/2002/debian-newmaint-200209/msg00021.htm
l
and there it is :)
M.
> http://nm.debian.org/amstatus.php?&user=me%40andrew.net.au Just like
that's not working, it tells "You should not be here!!" :)
But I entered nm.debian.org, and put my email adres in the editbox. Of course,
my status is quite ok, but ... ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received application 2002-01-
* Oliver Kurth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-11-22 16:48]:
> I believe a web mirror would not help at all. There were php
> scripts, and databases, and these _cannot_ (hopefully) be mirrored.
A web mirror would be _very_ helpful. The PHP scripts were in CVS
(still are ;) but the database is gone. We
* Teófilo Ruiz Suárez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-11-22 15:06]:
> I was in the "Waiting for AM" step, and I don't know what will happen
> with me and the others in the same step, 20 last time I checked (the day
> before the fire).
>
> Is anybody working on it?
Those "waiting for AM" have been resto
* Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-11-22 21:52]:
> Since satie.d.o has been destroyed, where does this leave the NM process?
I tried adding all applicants again. I have probably missed some, but
most should be there again. Your application can be reviewed at
http://nm.debian.org/amstatus
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 03:09:26PM +0100, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
> P.S.: this discussion lead me to a question: is it possible that we do not
> have any kind of backup for thing like that? I mean: even something like cvs
> offers a kind of backup, periodical dump of the db and such
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-11-22 14:54]:
>>> I didn't follow the discussion entirely, but at least at the beginning
>>> people weren't sure there was a backup of the database. Please correct
>>> me if I'm wrong.
>> Never underestimate the
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 04:38:36PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 04:10:39PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > > Never underestimate the power of Google's cache. :-)
> >
> > Google's cache was unfortunately out of date, too. So, while we
> > haven't lost everything, we
> The AM, FrontDesk and everyone that reads debian-newmaint. :)
> DAM stage is (more or less) easy to recover.
Thank God ;P
--
Mati ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sounds like a Windows problem, try calling Microsoft support
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 04:10:39PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > Never underestimate the power of Google's cache. :-)
>
> Google's cache was unfortunately out of date, too. So, while we
> haven't lost everything, we have certainly lost the last few
> months/weeks. I will post an announcemen
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 09:52:13PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> Since satie.d.o has been destroyed, where does this leave the NM
> process?
The real question is, will anything change in NM for those who've
already waited over 6 months for DAM approval. = P
11 and still counting...
Yours sincer
Mateusz Papiernik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I hope you're right... I was waiting for DAM approval, and now
> only my AM, perhaps, know what to do...
The AM, FrontDesk and everyone that reads debian-newmaint. :)
DAM stage is (more or less) easy to recover.
--
bye Joerg
A.D. 1517:
Martin Luth
H. S. Teoh wrote:
> "Real men don't take backups. They put their source on a public FTP-server
> and let the world mirror it." -- Linus Torvalds
So let's hope that somebody mirrored it... I hope a public HTTP-server
is alright, too.
--
Roland Bauerschmidt
* Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-11-22 14:54]:
> > I didn't follow the discussion entirely, but at least at the beginning
> > people weren't sure there was a backup of the database. Please correct
> > me if I'm wrong.
>
> Never underestimate the power of Google's cache. :-)
Google's cache
> "Real men don't take backups. They put their source on a public
> FTP-server and let the world mirror it." -- Linus Torvalds
ya, of course. But I thought, that nm.debian.org wasn't mirrored :-/
--
Mati ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sounds like a Windows problem, try calling Microsoft support
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 02:54:17PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
[snip]
> Never underestimate the power of Google's cache. :-)
[snip]
"Real men don't take backups. They put their source on a public FTP-server
and let the world mirror it." -- Linus Torvalds
;-)
T
--
The peace of mind--from knowin
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 03:09:26PM +0100, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
> P.S.: this discussion lead me to a question: is it possible that we do
> not have any kind of backup for thing like that? I mean: even
> something like cvs offers a kind of backup, periodical dump of the db
> and such
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 02:24:58PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 02:04:29PM +0100, Luca - De Whiskey's - De
> Vitis wrote:
> > The web site is only a nice fornt-end for the applicants to know
> > something about you place in the queue and the ste you passed.
>
> I guess the
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 02:45:59PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> I dont know if anyone else has something, but i sent tbm a postgresql
> dump from 2002-07-20. Not very actual, but its there.
Cool, that means that nm.d.o is going to be back (not as up to date as we
would it to be, but by now it's t
El 22-Nov-2002 a las 14:45:59, Joerg Jaspert escribió:
> Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I didn't follow the discussion entirely, but at least at the beginning
> > people weren't sure there was a backup of the database. Please correct
> > me if I'm wrong.
>
> I dont know if anyone
> I dont know if anyone else has something, but i sent tbm a postgresql
> dump from 2002-07-20. Not very actual, but its there.
> But hey, every AM should know his NM's and their state. :)
I hope you're right... I was waiting for DAM approval, and now
only my AM, perhaps, know what to do...
--
Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I didn't follow the discussion entirely, but at least at the beginning
> people weren't sure there was a backup of the database. Please correct
> me if I'm wrong.
I dont know if anyone else has something, but i sent tbm a postgresql
dump from 2002-07-20
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 02:04:29PM +0100, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
> The web site is only a nice fornt-end for the applicants to know something
> about you place in the queue and the ste you passed.
I guess the question was whether the queue *itself* is still
avaiable/recoverable.
I
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 09:52:13PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since satie.d.o has been destroyed, where does this leave the NM process?
The web site is only a nice fornt-end for the applicants to know something
about you place in the queue and the ste you passed.
Please, read http://w
Hi,
Since satie.d.o has been destroyed, where does this leave the NM process?
Andrew
28 matches
Mail list logo
