Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-11-22 14:54]: >>> I didn't follow the discussion entirely, but at least at the beginning >>> people weren't sure there was a backup of the database. Please correct >>> me if I'm wrong.
>> Never underestimate the power of Google's cache. :-) > Google's cache was unfortunately out of date, too. So, while we > haven't lost everything, we have certainly lost the last few > months/weeks. I will post an announcement when I know more. In the > meantime, those who have an AM should just work with an AM. I'm also > aware of the people without an AM but with an advocate. I've got http://nm.debian.org/nmlist.php from Sun, Nov 17 15:57:24 UTC 2002 in wwwoffle's cache, while this does not help for the individual /nmstatus.php?email=somebody it gives a nice summary about who was where in the NM-process and which steps were missing. cu andreas (V I P T A) -- Hey, da ist ein Ballonautomat auf der Toilette! Unofficial _Debian-packages_ of latest unstable _tin_ http://www.logic.univie.ac.at/~ametzler/debian/tin-snapshot/
