Re: Need help with getting a package to build reproducibly on arm*

2021-02-11 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2021-01-08, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > On 2021-01-08, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: >> On 2021-01-07, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: >>> On 2021-01-07, Michael Biebl wrote: Am 07.01.21 um 18:24 schrieb Michael Biebl: > as can be seen at [1], systemd does not build reproducibly on armhf and > a

Re: Need help with getting a package to build reproducibly on arm*

2021-01-10 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On Sat, 9 Jan 2021 at 00:52, Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 07.01.21 um 22:39 schrieb Michael Hudson-Doyle: > > > I'm hardly an expert in such things but it looks to me as if gcc is > > ordering things differently between the two builds: > > > > > https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/dbd/unsta

Re: Need help with getting a package to build reproducibly on arm*

2021-01-08 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2021-01-08, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > On 2021-01-07, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: >> On 2021-01-07, Michael Biebl wrote: >>> Am 07.01.21 um 18:24 schrieb Michael Biebl: as can be seen at [1], systemd does not build reproducibly on armhf and arm64 (while there is no problem on amd64 and i3

Re: Need help with getting a package to build reproducibly on arm*

2021-01-08 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 07.01.21 um 22:39 schrieb Michael Hudson-Doyle: I'm hardly an expert in such things but it looks to me as if gcc is ordering things differently between the two builds: https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/dbd/unstable/arm64/systemd_247.2-4.diffoscope.html#systemd-tests_---.---_arm--.

Re: Need help with getting a package to build reproducibly on arm*

2021-01-08 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2021-01-07, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > On 2021-01-07, Michael Biebl wrote: >> Am 07.01.21 um 18:24 schrieb Michael Biebl: >>> as can be seen at [1], systemd does not build reproducibly on armhf and >>> arm64 (while there is no problem on amd64 and i386). >>> >>> The problem is, I have no idea w

Re: Need help with getting a package to build reproducibly on arm*

2021-01-07 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2021-01-07, Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 07.01.21 um 18:24 schrieb Michael Biebl: >> as can be seen at [1], systemd does not build reproducibly on armhf and >> arm64 (while there is no problem on amd64 and i386). >> >> The problem is, I have no idea what the diffoscope diff [2] means and >> how I

Re: Need help with getting a package to build reproducibly on arm*

2021-01-07 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On Fri, 8 Jan 2021 at 06:24, Michael Biebl wrote: > Hi, > > as can be seen at [1], systemd does not build reproducibly on armhf and > arm64 (while there is no problem on amd64 and i386). > I'm hardly an expert in such things but it looks to me as if gcc is ordering things differently between the

Re: Need help with getting a package to build reproducibly on arm*

2021-01-07 Thread Michael Biebl
[crossposting this to the reproducible-build mailing list. Please CC on replies, as I'm not subscribed] Am 07.01.21 um 18:24 schrieb Michael Biebl: Hi, as can be seen at [1], systemd does not build reproducibly on armhf and arm64 (while there is no problem on amd64 and i386). The problem is,

Need help with getting a package to build reproducibly on arm*

2021-01-07 Thread Michael Biebl
Hi, as can be seen at [1], systemd does not build reproducibly on armhf and arm64 (while there is no problem on amd64 and i386). The problem is, I have no idea what the diffoscope diff [2] means and how I can make the package build reproducibly everywhere or how I can further investigate thi