On Sat, 9 Jan 2021 at 00:52, Michael Biebl <bi...@debian.org> wrote: > Am 07.01.21 um 22:39 schrieb Michael Hudson-Doyle: > > > I'm hardly an expert in such things but it looks to me as if gcc is > > ordering things differently between the two builds: > > > > > https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/dbd/unstable/arm64/systemd_247.2-4.diffoscope.html#systemd-tests_---.---_arm--.deb---data.tar.xz---data.tar---.-usr-lib-systemd-tests-manual-test-udev---objdump---line-numbers---disassemble---demangle---reloc---no-show-raw-insn---section-.text--- > > > > and all the other differences follow on from that. Unless systemd is > using > > particularly strange compiler options, > > cflags: > > https://salsa.debian.org/systemd-team/systemd/-/blob/debian/master/meson.build#L343 > > linkflags: > > https://salsa.debian.org/systemd-team/systemd/-/blob/debian/master/meson.build#L401
Those don't look particularly exotic to me. We do build with LTO enabled. > I guess that could be the culprit. Would still be a gcc bug though AIUI. Cheers, mwh
