* Helmut Grohne (hel...@subdivi.de) [150831 16:49]:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 03:04:17PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > minutes from the "32bit architectures in Debian" bof right now.
>
> It is my understanding that it was also agreed that mips and mipsel
>
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 03:04:17PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> minutes from the "32bit architectures in Debian" bof right now.
It is my understanding that it was also agreed that mips and mipsel
would be dropped as release architectures after stretch. Yet it seems
this was mis
On Thu, 2015-08-27 at 10:45 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-08-26 at 12:08 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > > Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > > Specific issues:
> > > > - for i386, there is still sold new hardware with 32bit-only. Are
> > > > there open issues for i3
Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-08-26 at 12:08 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > Specific issues:
> > > - for i386, there is still sold new hardware with 32bit-only. Are
> > > there open issues for i386 (apart from the 32bit-generic ones)?
> > > Discussion that we n
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 12:30:42AM +0200, Julian Taylor wrote:
> On 26.08.2015 21:08, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > Andreas Barth wrote:
> >> Specific issues:
> >> - for i386, there is still sold new hardware with 32bit-only. Are
> >> there open issues for i386 (apart from the 32bit-generic ones)?
> >
On 26.08.2015 21:08, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Andreas Barth wrote:
>> Specific issues:
>> - for i386, there is still sold new hardware with 32bit-only. Are
>> there open issues for i386 (apart from the 32bit-generic ones)?
>> Discussion that we need to get rid of it one day should be started.
>
On Wed, 2015-08-26 at 12:08 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Andreas Barth wrote:
> > Specific issues:
> > - for i386, there is still sold new hardware with 32bit-only. Are
> > there open issues for i386 (apart from the 32bit-generic ones)?
> > Discussion that we need to get rid of it one day shou
Andreas Barth wrote:
> Specific issues:
> - for i386, there is still sold new hardware with 32bit-only. Are
> there open issues for i386 (apart from the 32bit-generic ones)?
> Discussion that we need to get rid of it one day should be started.
Brand-new 32-bit-only x86 hardware is currently be
* Andreas Barth:
> * Florian Weimer (f...@deneb.enyo.de) [150823 17:02]:
>> * Andreas Barth:
>>
>> > Specific issues:
>> > - for i386, there is still sold new hardware with 32bit-only. Are
>> > there open issues for i386 (apart from the 32bit-generic ones)?
>>
>> FWIW, for x32, the security te
On Wed, 2015-08-26 at 13:51 +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 09:38:04AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > > Specific issues:
> > > > - for i386, there is still sold new hardware with 32bit-only. Are
> > > > there open issues for i386 (apart from the 32bit-generic ones)?
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 09:38:04AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > Specific issues:
> > > - for i386, there is still sold new hardware with 32bit-only. Are
> > > there open issues for i386 (apart from the 32bit-generic ones)?
> >
> > FWIW, for x32, the security team would prefer if support in
On Wed, 2015-08-26 at 09:38 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Florian Weimer (f...@deneb.enyo.de) [150823 17:02]:
> > * Andreas Barth:
> >
> > > Specific issues:
> > > - for i386, there is still sold new hardware with 32bit-only. Are
> > > there open issues for i386 (apart from the 32bit-generic o
* Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) [150825 03:09]:
> Andreas Barth writes:
>
> > - for i386, there is still sold new hardware with 32bit-only. Are
> > there open issues for i386 (apart from the 32bit-generic ones)?
> > Discussion that we need to get rid of it one day should be started.
>
> Can
* Florian Weimer (f...@deneb.enyo.de) [150823 17:02]:
> * Andreas Barth:
>
> > Specific issues:
> > - for i386, there is still sold new hardware with 32bit-only. Are
> > there open issues for i386 (apart from the 32bit-generic ones)?
>
> FWIW, for x32, the security team would prefer if support
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 3:08 AM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Can we fully support cross-grading to amd64 before we do that? My
> remaining i386 systems, and I'm sure I'm not the only one, are systems
> that I've been continuously dist-upgrading for some time precisely because
> I don't want to rebuild
On Aug 25, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > - for i386, there is still sold new hardware with 32bit-only. Are
> > there open issues for i386 (apart from the 32bit-generic ones)?
> > Discussion that we need to get rid of it one day should be started.
> Can we fully support cross-grading to amd64 before
Andreas Barth writes:
> - for i386, there is still sold new hardware with 32bit-only. Are
> there open issues for i386 (apart from the 32bit-generic ones)?
> Discussion that we need to get rid of it one day should be started.
Can we fully support cross-grading to amd64 before we do that? My
Andreas Barth ayous.org> writes:
> - for i386, there is still sold new hardware with 32bit-only. Are
> there open issues for i386 (apart from the 32bit-generic ones)?
> Discussion that we need to get rid of it one day should be started.
Eh, is this some sort of conspiracy to make Debian even
* Andreas Barth:
> Specific issues:
> - for i386, there is still sold new hardware with 32bit-only. Are
> there open issues for i386 (apart from the 32bit-generic ones)?
FWIW, for x32, the security team would prefer if support in the Debian
amd64 kernel would remain guarded by a boot-time optio
Hi together,
minutes from the "32bit architectures in Debian" bof right now.
Andi
32bit architectures in Debian
- 32bit architectures are not going away for the forseeable
- Compiling/Linking is the memory-using issue
- We need a way to compile/link with more memory
Proposal A:
-
20 matches
Mail list logo
