On Wed, 2015-08-26 at 13:51 +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 09:38:04AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > > > Specific issues: > > > > - for i386, there is still sold new hardware with 32bit-only. Are > > > > there open issues for i386 (apart from the 32bit-generic ones)? > > > > > > FWIW, for x32, the security team would prefer if support in the Debian > > > amd64 kernel would remain guarded by a boot-time option. > > > > You mean that on an kernel from an amd64-installation, 32bit binaries > > could only be used with an appropriate boot option? This however isn't > > any issue with the i386-architecture, but only on using this arch in > > an chroot in an amd64-installation. > x32 is not just i386 binaries (though I'm curious why this should be > disabled by default).
Explained in https://bugs.debian.org/708070 Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Always try to do things in chronological order; it's less confusing that way.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
