[Andrey Rahmatullin]
> Not all Debian contributors are Debian Contributors whatever that means.
> Lots of people without keys somewhere in official keyrings are doing
> useful work. Some of them are even maintaining packages.
And actually, come January, a pretty high fraction of official Debian
D
> On 2014-11-11 12:25, Ben Finney wrote:
> > But all Debian Contributors have their OpenPGP key in the
> > project's keyring. No?
>
> Most certainly not.
> Parts where many people who is not DD nor DM takes part include docs,
> web, translations and graphics.
FWIW, when I first started running s
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 02:13:20PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Dienstag, 11. November 2014, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> > > I'd be willing to help out.
> > So would I.
> me too, should this road be chosen.
>
Excellent. In that case, my position is now "meh" :)
Neil
--
signature.asc
Descrip
Hi,
On Dienstag, 11. November 2014, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> > I'd be willing to help out.
> So would I.
me too, should this road be chosen.
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hi,
Scott Kitterman:
> On Tuesday, November 11, 2014 12:41:12 PM Neil McGovern wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 01:30:58PM +0100, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> > > Andrey Rahmatullin:
> > > > > I know. So? If the first email of a non-DD gets delayed for a few
> > > > > hours,
> > > > > that's an acc
On Tuesday, November 11, 2014 12:41:12 PM Neil McGovern wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 01:30:58PM +0100, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> > Andrey Rahmatullin:
> > > > I know. So? If the first email of a non-DD gets delayed for a few
> > > > hours,
> > > > that's an acceptable price to pay IMHO.
> > >
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 01:30:58PM +0100, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> > > I know. So? If the first email of a non-DD gets delayed for a few hours,
> > > that's an acceptable price to pay IMHO.
> > Nothing about delays wasn't mentioned in your previous email
> Moderating (some) emails to d-d implies
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:42:38PM +0100, Martin Bagge / brother wrote:
> > But all Debian Contributors have their OpenPGP key in the
> > project's keyring. No?
> Most certainly not.
> Parts where many people who is not DD nor DM takes part include docs,
> web, translations and graphics.
I think th
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 01:30:58PM +0100, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Andrey Rahmatullin:
> > > I know. So? If the first email of a non-DD gets delayed for a few hours,
> > > that's an acceptable price to pay IMHO.
> > Nothing about delays wasn't mentioned in your previous email
>
> Moderating (som
Hi,
Andrey Rahmatullin:
> > I know. So? If the first email of a non-DD gets delayed for a few hours,
> > that's an acceptable price to pay IMHO.
> Nothing about delays wasn't mentioned in your previous email
Moderating (some) emails to d-d implies delaying those emails until
a human moderator lo
+++ Charles Plessy [2014-11-10 23:25 +0900]:
> Hi all,
>
> >From now on I will try to see if I can give to Debian the same quality of
> contribution without being subscribed to debian-devel. And I invite you to
> think about it and *not* to discuss it on this list.
Just a data-point:
I joined d
On 11 Nov 22:25, Ben Finney wrote:
> Andrey Rahmatullin writes:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 08:50:52AM +0100, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> > > I'd be in favor of a different approach: moderate debian-devel. Not
> > > the content, but the list of people allowed to post. Pre-seed it
> > > with the e
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:22:53PM +0100, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> > > I'd be in favor of a different approach: moderate debian-devel. Not the
> > > content, but the list of people allowed to post. Pre-seed it with the
> > > email adresses in our keyring and auto-add anybody who signs their email
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 10:25:05PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> > > I'd be in favor of a different approach: moderate debian-devel. Not
> > > the content, but the list of people allowed to post. Pre-seed it
> > > with the email adresses in our keyring and auto-add anybody who
> > > signs their email
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2014-11-11 12:25, Ben Finney wrote:
> But all Debian Contributors have their OpenPGP key in the
> project's keyring. No?
Most certainly not.
Parts where many people who is not DD nor DM takes part include docs,
web, translations and graphics.
-
Andrey Rahmatullin writes:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 08:50:52AM +0100, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> > I'd be in favor of a different approach: moderate debian-devel. Not
> > the content, but the list of people allowed to post. Pre-seed it
> > with the email adresses in our keyring and auto-add anybo
Hi,
Andrey Rahmatullin:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 08:50:52AM +0100, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> > I'd be in favor of a different approach: moderate debian-devel. Not the
> > content, but the list of people allowed to post. Pre-seed it with the
> > email adresses in our keyring and auto-add anybody w
Hi Charles,
> after unsubscribing from debian-vote, I had a bit of a thought about
> debian-devel, which is hard to follow now, and suddenly I saw something very
> clear. This year's freeze seems of an excellent quality and promises to be
> brief. Is that thanks to debian-devel ? Not much. Ex
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 08:50:52AM +0100, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> I'd be in favor of a different approach: moderate debian-devel. Not the
> content, but the list of people allowed to post. Pre-seed it with the
> email adresses in our keyring and auto-add anybody who signs their email
> with a key
> "David" == David L Craig writes:
David> On 14Nov10:2154+0100, Gergely Nagy wrote:
>> You do realize topic lists are public too, right?
David> Yes, but most Debian users don't even know about
David> them nor do they need to since the traditional
David> lists have been do
Hi,
Philipp Kern:
> Discussions should move to the appropriate venues (like bugs and focussed
> lists for subprojects, maintainance lists) instead of providing a soapbox of
> anger.
>
Hmm. We already have a bunch of focused lists for subprojects.
The problem with splitting it all up and disbandi
On 14Nov11:0036+0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 2014-11-10 18:20, David L. Craig wrote:
> >
> >But weaker by becoming more non-public? At what point
> >is the Social Contract undermined? What about transforming
> >those lists into readable by all but open only to
> >certain responsible posters in
On 2014-11-10 18:20, David L. Craig wrote:
On 14Nov10:2325+0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
With most of the work done on topic mailing lists, trolls lose the
lever effect
they have when feasting on debian-devel or debian-vote. Let's make
our project
stronger by reducing thr attack surface for tr
On Monday, November 10, 2014 04:55:20 PM David L. Craig wrote:
> On 14Nov10:2154+0100, Gergely Nagy wrote:
> > You do realize topic lists are public too, right?
>
> Yes, but most Debian users don't even know about
> them nor do they need to since the traditional
> lists have been doing their jobs
On 14Nov10:2154+0100, Gergely Nagy wrote:
> You do realize topic lists are public too, right?
Yes, but most Debian users don't even know about
them nor do they need to since the traditional
lists have been doing their jobs for quite a
while. If you shut them down, I expect most of
the public wil
> "David" == David L Craig writes:
David> On 14Nov10:2325+0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>> With most of the work done on topic mailing lists, trolls lose the lever
effect
>> they have when feasting on debian-devel or debian-vote. Let's make our
project
>> stronger by reducing
On 14Nov10:2325+0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> With most of the work done on topic mailing lists, trolls lose the lever
> effect
> they have when feasting on debian-devel or debian-vote. Let's make our
> project
> stronger by reducing thr attack surface for troublemakers.
But weaker by becoming
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 11:25:35PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> after unsubscribing from debian-vote, I had a bit of a thought about
> debian-devel, which is hard to follow now, and suddenly I saw something very
> clear. This year's freeze seems of an excellent quality and promises
Hi all,
after unsubscribing from debian-vote, I had a bit of a thought about
debian-devel, which is hard to follow now, and suddenly I saw something very
clear. This year's freeze seems of an excellent quality and promises to be
brief. Is that thanks to debian-devel ? Not much. Excellent work
29 matches
Mail list logo
