Hi, Scott Kitterman: > On Tuesday, November 11, 2014 12:41:12 PM Neil McGovern wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 01:30:58PM +0100, Matthias Urlichs wrote: > > > Andrey Rahmatullin: > > > > > I know. So? If the first email of a non-DD gets delayed for a few > > > > > hours, > > > > > that's an acceptable price to pay IMHO. > > > > > > > > Nothing about delays wasn't mentioned in your previous email > > > > > > Moderating (some) emails to d-d implies delaying those emails until > > > a human moderator looks at them. To me at least. Therefore I didn't > > > think of explicitly mentioning that; sorry if that was unclear. > > > > My concern would be around /which/ human moderator does this. The > > project passed a GR about declassifying -private, for example, and this > > had never been achieved because the people who are willing to put the > > work in don't exist. > > I'd be willing to help out. > So would I.
Declassifying -private is different because (apparently) nobody wants to spend a block of time wading through old -private emails, most of which are now irrelevant. In contrast, a quick decision about whether to whitelist an email, when I'm scanning my mails anyway, doesn't have the same impact. -- -- Matthias Urlichs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141111125957.gf23...@smurf.noris.de
