A little help needed with postfix packaging (debconf)

Hi! I'd love to have little help with postfix before trixie. There are 2 open issues which needs fixing, both involving debconf, and I haven't dealt with debconf before (despite being a long-term DD), and my time these days is scarce, - so it would be difficult for me to complete the task before

Re: Help needed for watch file after bitbucket changed download page

Hello Andreas, On 2022-09-29 14:54 4, Andreas Tille wrote: I confirm this works. However, uscan does not do the usual link to orig.tar.gz. Any idea why this is the case? I have found this bug: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=896705 But did you have signing key from Rob Egan

Bitbucket changed download page - possibly lots of watch files affected (Was: Help needed for watch file after bitbucket changed download page)

Hi Nilesh, Am Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 03:43:58PM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra: > I don't know how to go about it, but I suspect -devel might be a better list > for this since this is a general question and many package maintainers could > be using bitbucket sources. While I considered debian-mentors

Re: Help needed with a dh_shlibs failure on non amd64 platforms

On Mon, 04 Jul 2022 at 09:29:54 +0200, Martin Quinson wrote: > All libraries (eg libns3-bridge.so.36.1) that it cannot find are part of the > package. They are added to the debian/libns3.36/DEBIAN/shlibs Independent of the dh_shlibdeps failure that was already diagnosed, if these libraries are pub

Re: Help needed with a dh_shlibs failure on non amd64 platforms

Hello, Martin Quinson, le lun. 04 juil. 2022 09:29:54 +0200, a ecrit: > dpkg-shlibdeps -Tdebian/libns3.36.substvars > debian/libns3.36/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libns3-wimax.so.36.1 x86_64-linux-gnu is only valid for amd64. In ./debian/rules: -DCMAKE_INSTALL_RUNSTATEDIR=/run -DCM

Help needed with a dh_shlibs failure on non amd64 platforms

Hello all, I come to you because I'm puzzled with a bug I have in one of my package, and I'm seeking for help. Please CC me when answering as I'm not on this list. The package is ns3, a scientific simulator of computer networks. This package is huge, I seem to be the only active maintainer, but u

Re: Help needed: C++ compile error with nix 2.5.1

* Thomas Koch , 2022-01-16, 11:23: https://github.com/NixOS/nix/issues/5923 The first bad commit is: https://github.com/nlohmann/json/commit/0e694b4060ed55df (This happens to be also the first bad commit for , so I guess it's the same issue.) I

Help needed: C++ compile error with nix 2.5.1

For a C++ programmer who cares about nix in Debian: https://github.com/NixOS/nix/issues/5923 Thank you! Thomas

Re: help needed to resolve nodejs transition #963039

On Fri, Jul 03, 2020 at 07:50:55PM +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote: >... > One can install nodejs 10 along with libnode64, and build node-iconv > using libnode-dev 12 which links to libnode72. > > However, running node-iconv tests in the autopkgtests environment requires > the nodejs version that is linke

Re: help needed to resolve nodejs transition #963039

Le ven. 3 juil. 2020 à 20:53, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2020-07-03 20:45:22) > > Quoting Jérémy Lal (2020-07-03 19:50:55) > > > I have a problem with the transition of nodejs: > > > from version 10 with abi libnode64 > > > to version 12 with abi libnode72 > > > > > >

Re: help needed to resolve nodejs transition #963039

Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2020-07-03 20:45:22) > Quoting Jérémy Lal (2020-07-03 19:50:55) > > I have a problem with the transition of nodejs: > > from version 10 with abi libnode64 > > to version 12 with abi libnode72 > > > > C(++) addons like node-iconv can be compiled using libnode-dev, > > so i

Re: help needed to resolve nodejs transition #963039

Quoting Jérémy Lal (2020-07-03 19:50:55) > I have a problem with the transition of nodejs: > from version 10 with abi libnode64 > to version 12 with abi libnode72 > > C(++) addons like node-iconv can be compiled using libnode-dev, > so installing an addon automatically installs the right libnodeXX

Re: help needed to resolve nodejs transition #963039

Hi Jérémy, On 03-07-2020 19:50, Jérémy Lal wrote: > Those failures seem to be preventing transition to testing (which is > understandable). > Two questions: > - how to fix the issue now One option is that the libnode72 add a Breaks on the broken versions of node-iconv, node-expat, node-* in testi

help needed to resolve nodejs transition #963039

Hi, I have a problem with the transition of nodejs: from version 10 with abi libnode64 to version 12 with abi libnode72 C(++) addons like node-iconv can be compiled using libnode-dev, so installing an addon automatically installs the right libnodeXX version. (all addons Build-Depend libnode-dev).

Re: Help needed: conflicting interests between Salsa admins and Salsa users (Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When to Salsa)

Hi! On 06.01.20 19:56, Alexander Wirt wrote: > On Mon, 06 Jan 2020, Ulrike Uhlig wrote: >>> On 28.12.19 18:16, Alexander Wirt wrote: >> >From your replies to emails in this thread I was wondering: do you mean >> that the Salsa team does not need, or does not want, help? Or does not >> need, or wan

Re: Help needed: conflicting interests between Salsa admins and Salsa users (Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When to Salsa)

On Mon, 06 Jan 2020, Ulrike Uhlig wrote: > Hi formorer, > > > On 28.12.19 18:16, Alexander Wirt wrote: > >> On Thu, 26 Dec 2019, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > >> I am sure there are many ways to help the team and it is not just > >> about Salsa/Gitlab admin stuff, but also about creating structure in

Re: Help needed: conflicting interests between Salsa admins and Salsa users (Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When to Salsa)

Hi formorer, > On 28.12.19 18:16, Alexander Wirt wrote: >> On Thu, 26 Dec 2019, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: >> I am sure there are many ways to help the team and it is not just >> about Salsa/Gitlab admin stuff, but also about creating structure in >> the team, triaging issues, spreading best practices

Re: Help needed: conflicting interests between Salsa admins and Salsa users (Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When to Salsa)

On Mon, 06 Jan 2020, Sam Hartman wrote: > > "Alexander" == Alexander Wirt writes: > > Alexander> For everything else: we are working on it. > > I just want to confirm that part of the things that you are working on > is documenting the issues. At a number of points you've talked about

Re: Help needed: conflicting interests between Salsa admins and Salsa users (Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When to Salsa)

> "Alexander" == Alexander Wirt writes: Alexander> For everything else: we are working on it. I just want to confirm that part of the things that you are working on is documenting the issues. At a number of points you've talked about how people are misunderstanding the issues or are th

Re: Help needed: conflicting interests between Salsa admins and Salsa users (Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When to Salsa)

On Wed, 01 Jan 2020, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > Hello! > > ti 31. jouluk. 2019 klo 14.55 Alexander Wirt (formo...@debian.org) kirjoitti: > > On Mon, 30 Dec 2019, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > > > Also, if resources are an issue: I've offered several times to see if I > > > can get some k8s resources for g

Re: Help needed: conflicting interests between Salsa admins and Salsa users (Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When to Salsa)

Hello! ti 31. jouluk. 2019 klo 14.55 Alexander Wirt (formo...@debian.org) kirjoitti: > On Mon, 30 Dec 2019, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > > Also, if resources are an issue: I've offered several times to see if I > > can get some k8s resources for gitlab runners, but never got a reply. > > Not even a no.

Re: Help needed: conflicting interests between Salsa admins and Salsa users (Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When to Salsa)

On Mon, 30 Dec 2019, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > > > On 12/30/19 11:29 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > I don't think that salsa-ci is particularly problematic in terms of > > "efficiency". With the exception of the LXC usage, there's not much > > that can be "cut" to save resources. > > Also, if reso

Re: Help needed: conflicting interests between Salsa admins and Salsa users (Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When to Salsa)

On 12/30/19 11:29 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > I don't think that salsa-ci is particularly problematic in terms of > "efficiency". With the exception of the LXC usage, there's not much > that can be "cut" to save resources. Also, if resources are an issue: I've offered several times to see if I

Re: Help needed: conflicting interests between Salsa admins and Salsa users (Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When to Salsa)

On Mon, 30 Dec 2019, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Sat, 28 Dec 2019, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > On Thu, 26 Dec 2019, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > > > > > Hello! > > > > > > I've seen many times before statements like these so I'd like to raise > > > some discussion around the topic: > > > > > > pe 13.

Re: Help needed: conflicting interests between Salsa admins and Salsa users (Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When to Salsa)

On Sat, 28 Dec 2019, Alexander Wirt wrote: > On Thu, 26 Dec 2019, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > > > Hello! > > > > I've seen many times before statements like these so I'd like to raise > > some discussion around the topic: > > > > pe 13. syysk. 2019 klo 16.36 Bastian Blank (wa...@debian.org) kirjoit

Re: Help needed: conflicting interests between Salsa admins and Salsa users (Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When to Salsa)

On Thu, 26 Dec 2019, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > Hello! > > I've seen many times before statements like these so I'd like to raise > some discussion around the topic: > > pe 13. syysk. 2019 klo 16.36 Bastian Blank (wa...@debian.org) kirjoitti: > > On Sun, Sep 08, 2019 at 05:35:10PM -0400, Sam Hartm

Re: Help needed: conflicting interests between Salsa admins and Salsa users (Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When to Salsa)

On Thu, 26 Dec 2019, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > I am sure there are many ways to help the team and it is not just > about Salsa/Gitlab admin stuff, but also about creating structure in > the team, triaging issues, spreading best practices for users and > helping the most advanced users to grow into a

Help needed: conflicting interests between Salsa admins and Salsa users (Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When to Salsa)

Hello! I've seen many times before statements like these so I'd like to raise some discussion around the topic: pe 13. syysk. 2019 klo 16.36 Bastian Blank (wa...@debian.org) kirjoitti: > On Sun, Sep 08, 2019 at 05:35:10PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote: > > The Salsa CA pipeline is recommended. > > For

Re: Help needed with a script generating a .deb (Done. Now what?)

On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 08:31:34PM +0200, dettus wrote: > Now that I am able to create packages What do I do with them? Read my link again. Also, the packaging help list is debian-mentors@. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Help needed with a script generating a .deb (Done. Now what?)

Hello. So, I succeeded! There are two Warnings left W: dmagnetic: description-synopsis-starts-with-article W: dmagnetic: extra-license-file usr/share/doc/dmagnetic/LICENSE.txt If you do not mind, I would like to keep them. Now that I am able to create packages What do I do with them? Th

Re: Help needed with a script generating a .deb

On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 07:19:32PM +0200, dettus wrote: > Running it ends with  the following feedback: > > > > > dpkg-buildpackage: info: full upload (original source is included) > Now running lintian... > W: dmagnetic: missing-depends-line > W: dmagnetic: description-synopsis-starts-with

Re: Help needed with a script generating a .deb

Hello all. Thanks to your input, I think I am getting closer. For debian, I created a repository at https://github.com/dettus/ports_and_packages/tree/master/Debian In it, you will find a debian/ subdirectory. In which I put the files that seem to be required for debuild, if I am not mistak

Re: Help needed with a script generating a .deb

Hi Thomas! On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 11:25:40 +0200 (CEST) Thomas Dettbarn wrote: > Hello! > > So, I have this awesome project, that I am trying to get into the > package repository of Debian. I already filed an RFP, which can be > found at the WNPP bug tracker, where it is gathering dust. > > https

Re: Help needed with a script generating a .deb

We don't use dpkg-deb -b to create packages. If you want to create a package that can be uploaded to Debian, start with https://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Help needed with a script generating a .deb

Hello! So, I have this awesome project, that I am trying to get into the package repository of Debian. I already filed an RFP, which can be found at the WNPP bug tracker, where it is gathering dust. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=929619 So, I tried my hand at creating a packag

Re: Help needed for #871234 FTBFS with GCC-7: error: type/value mismatch

On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 8:44 PM, Jeff Epler wrote: > On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 01:55:58PM +0200, Alex Mestiashvili wrote: > > GHash.hh:91:44: error: type/value mismatch at argument 1 in template > > parameter list for 'template struct std::hash' > > while (pos > Nothing in this line is intended

Re: Help needed for #871234 FTBFS with GCC-7: error: type/value mismatch

On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 01:55:58PM +0200, Alex Mestiashvili wrote: > GHash.hh:91:44: error: type/value mismatch at argument 1 in template > parameter list for 'template struct std::hash' > while (pos

Re: Help needed for #871234 FTBFS with GCC-7: error: type/value mismatch

Hi Alex! Alex Mestiashvili kirjoitti 05.09.2017 klo 14:55: parameter list for 'template struct std::hash' while (pos I think the problem is we don't want std::hash but GHash::hash and GHash::GHashEntry::hash. (Sorry, I haven't looked deeper into how to get the correct 'hash'.) Cheers, Juh

Help needed for #871234 FTBFS with GCC-7: error: type/value mismatch

Any help is greatly appreciated, here it the gcc's complain: In file included from gff.h:12:0, from gtf_tracking.h:12, from bundles.h:22, from replicates.h:10, from common.cpp:28: GHash.hh: In member function 'GHash::GHashEntry* G

Re: Help needed talking to upstream browser developers about Debian SSO

Hi, On 15.10.2015 22:04, Olaf Titz wrote: > Why that way? Reading an argument that the browser is "secure > infrastructure" and "audited code" makes me shudder (sorry). There is a standard for security modules, which can be dedicated hardware, or the fallback "software security module". These ha

Re: Help needed talking to upstream browser developers about Debian SSO

> From what I've gathered, they want to deprecate storing private keys > without associated certificates, which would be really bad. There is an > audited infrastructure for key generation and storage, including > smartcard support, and adding a requirement that keys may only be added > together wi

Re: Help needed talking to upstream browser developers about Debian SSO

Hi, On 15.10.2015 18:08, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > While we make use of that tag (e.g. in the TERENA Personal Certificate > Service that some academics may know), the browser developers may have a > point that there are other ways to implement the enrolment step. People > can generate a certificat

Re: Help needed talking to upstream browser developers about Debian SSO

Hi Enrico, On Sun, October 11, 2015 20:50, Enrico Zini wrote: > However, there is discussion in the Chrome[5] and Mozilla[6] communities > about deprecating client certificate authentication. In those threads, > > I don't quite mind if is removed, as long as there would be a > replacement that a

Help needed talking to upstream browser developers about Debian SSO

Hello, I need help to make our SSO use case for client certificates known in the upstream browser development communities. Here is the story. At DebConf we deployed a new experimental single signon system based on ssl client certificates[1], and it works quite nicely. In particular, it allows any

Help needed to maintain wordpress

[ Bcc debian-devel to make the offer both to new maintainers and experienced ones ] Hello, I would like to find someone willing to take over the maintenance of wordpress in Debian (the most popular software to run a blog). The package is in a relatively good shape but it needs active maintenance

help needed: dist-upgrade of quantz.debian.org

Hi, i would like to dist-upgrade quantz.debian.org to wheezy this weekend. It would be helpful if someone who knows the running cronjobs and services on quantz.d.o could contact me either by mail or on IRC. Cheers, Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linu

Re: Help needed to debug a failing bot on i18n.debian.org

Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org): > Cyril Brulebois (2013-09-30): > > Yes; debian-i18n membership ping. > > > > Can't see the page on alioth due to: > > Permission denied. This project's administrator will have to grant you > > permission to view this page. > > > > so can't request i

Re: Help needed to debug a failing bot on i18n.debian.org

Cyril Brulebois (2013-09-30): > Yes; debian-i18n membership ping. > > Can't see the page on alioth due to: > Permission denied. This project's administrator will have to grant you > permission to view this page. > > so can't request it myself. You should be able to add me from your end > thou

Re: Help needed to debug a failing bot on i18n.debian.org

Christian PERRIER (2013-09-30): > So, in short, we need fellow developers' help. Preferrably from people > who can access i18n.debian.org and work under the debian-i18n role in > order to test things as they are. In short, Debian developers who > would be granted that role(maybe the latter is not

Help needed to debug a failing bot on i18n.debian.org

Hello fellow developers, The i18n crowd needs your help. In order to provide translators and teams with valuable material to work, we have a few automated processes that are running on the i18n.debian.org machine. The source code for all this stuff is stored in git+ssh://git.debian.org/git/debia

Re: tech-ctte help needed: main dependencies on non-free/contrib

Ivo De Decker writes: > On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 02:51:14PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: >> And this: >> yagf: Depends: 'cuneiform | tesseract-ocr' [choice 1: cuneiform from >> non-free] >> which is also a bug but a less serious one. > Why is this less serious? When you install yagf (with non-fre

Re: Bug#681419: tech-ctte help needed: main dependencies on non-free/contrib

Ivo De Decker writes ("Bug#681419: tech-ctte help needed: main dependencies on non-free/contrib"): > There's also these: > > capi4hylafax: Recommends: 'isdnactivecards' [choice 1: isdnactivecards from > contrib] > deutex: Recommends: 'doom-wad'

Re: tech-ctte help needed: main dependencies on non-free/contrib

Hi, On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 02:51:14PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > We also have this: > gscan2pdf: Recommends: 'cuneiform' [choice 1: cuneiform from non-free] > which looks like a bug, which I have filed. There's also these: capi4hylafax: Recommends: 'isdnactivecards' [choice 1: isdnactivecard

Re: tech-ctte help needed: main dependencies on non-free/contrib

Eugene V. Lyubimkin writes ("Re: tech-ctte help needed: main dependencies on non-free/contrib"): > On 2012-07-17 10:35, Russ Allbery wrote: > > Could someone who has the time and the tools available do a check on all > > the dependencies in main for dependencies o

Re: tech-ctte help needed: main dependencies on non-free/contrib

Hi, On 2012-07-17 10:35, Russ Allbery wrote: > Could someone who has the time and the tools available do a check on all > the dependencies in main for dependencies on non-free/contrib? This > information would be very helpful in evaluating tech-ctte bug #681419. In > particular: [...] I wrote a

Re: tech-ctte help needed: main dependencies on non-free/contrib

* Niels Thykier , 2012-07-17, 20:03: It would also be quite interesting, although much harder to determine, whether there are any scenarios where such a dependency would result in a non-free package being installed by default. If, for example, there's a dependency on foo | foo-nonfree and some

Re: tech-ctte help needed: main dependencies on non-free/contrib

Niels Thykier writes ("Re: tech-ctte help needed: main dependencies on non-free/contrib"): > I suspect installability checking of all packages should find them if > they are there. One run with non-free+contrib and one without - the > "newly" uninstallable between t

Re: tech-ctte help needed: main dependencies on non-free/contrib

On 2012-07-17 19:35, Russ Allbery wrote: > Hello all, > > [...] > > It would also be quite interesting, although much harder to determine, > whether there are any scenarios where such a dependency would result in a > non-free package being installed by default. If, for example, there's a > depen

tech-ctte help needed: main dependencies on non-free/contrib

Hello all, Could someone who has the time and the tools available do a check on all the dependencies in main for dependencies on non-free/contrib? This information would be very helpful in evaluating tech-ctte bug #681419. In particular: * How many total dependencies are there? (We're only int

Re: Porter help needed: CCSEapps

Alastair McKinstry (05/12/2011): > ie. whether the arch is little / big endian, supports IEEE arithmetic, > etc. Can anyone help? http://wiki.debian.org/ArchitectureSpecificsMemo might help, for a start. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Porter help needed: CCSEapps

Is that Overture / U.S. tax funded stuff? Object-Oriented Tools for Solving PDEs in Complex Geometries ? Is it better than Maxima or Octave with PDE's or graphing? Does one need to CAD a whole simulation in Overture specific format to get a "dynamic" sol'n (paid for / sought)? -- To UNSUBS

Porter help needed: CCSEapps

Hi, I have a package CCSEapps that needs a quick look at by porters. / // TODO -- add more machine descriptions. // #if !(defined(__alpha)|| \ defined(_CRAY1) || \ defined(_CRAYT3E) || \ defined(__sgi) || \ defined(__sun)

OSS Research Help Needed Please - drawing for tablet computer ($500.00 gift card) for participation.

Hello! We are asking you for some help from the Open Source communities. As researchers at the University of Tennessee we are interested in discovering more about learning and interactions of members of the open source forums. This research is conducted through the University of Tennessee and i

Re: Help needed please help

On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 8:18 PM, Marin George Sorin wrote: > Hy can you please help me get rid of red screen ...please i asked so many > ppl and no 1 knows how to help me...it`s about GRUB4DOS 0.4.4 i can give you > every detail please answer me You have contacted the email list for Debian develo

Help needed please help

Hy can you please help me get rid of red screen ...please i asked so many ppl and no 1 knows how to help me...it`s about GRUB4DOS 0.4.4 i can give you every detail please answer me

Help needed: upgrade/replace and dpkg-divert

Hi all, I am stuck in TeX Live/luaTeX package upgrades with the following problem: Up to unstable luatex ships with two diversions for /usr/bin/texdoc and /usr/share/man/man1/texdoc.1. The diversion have been created with dpkg-divert --add --package luatex --rename \ --divert /u

Re: Preparing lecture about Debian. Help needed.

On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 09:31:37AM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote: > On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 03:00:12PM +0300, Alexander GQ Gerasiov wrote: [..] > > I'm going to lecture there (2 hours) about Debian project, deb > > packages, repositories, release cycle etc. So that would be something > > like "debian dev

Re: Preparing lecture about Debian. Help needed.

On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 09:31:37AM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote: > On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 03:00:12PM +0300, Alexander GQ Gerasiov wrote: > > Hi there. > > > > I'd like to ask you guys for some help. > > > > Here in Moscow State University there is a course "Software > > maintenance in Linux Distribut

Re : Re: Preparing lecture about Debian. Help needed.

Re: Preparing lecture about Debian. Help needed.

On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 03:00:12PM +0300, Alexander GQ Gerasiov wrote: > Hi there. > > I'd like to ask you guys for some help. > > Here in Moscow State University there is a course "Software > maintenance in Linux Distribution." It is dedicated to general question > of software packaging. As exam

Preparing lecture about Debian. Help needed.

Hi there. I'd like to ask you guys for some help. Here in Moscow State University there is a course "Software maintenance in Linux Distribution." It is dedicated to general question of software packaging. As example they use rpm-based community repository Sisyphus (related to AltLinux distributio

Re: Help needed on mipsel #541706: gpe-expenses_0.1.7-2+b1(mipsel/unstable)

On 2009-08-19, Andreas Moog wrote: > Another way to fix this is to have the scripts use /bin/bash as shell > (as Daniel Leidert suggested, this is a problem with dash as /bin/sh). I guess I need to point out that dash as default will propagate to the buildds when chroots are redone. (Which does

Re: Help needed on mipsel #541706: gpe-expenses_0.1.7-2+b1(mipsel/unstable)

Neil Williams wrote: [...] >>> make[3]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/gpe-expenses-0.1.7/po-lib' >>> cd .. \ >>> && CONFIG_FILES=po/Makefile.in CONFIG_HEADERS= CONFIG_LINKS= \ >>>/bin/sh ./config.status >>> config.status: creating po/Makefile.in >>> config.status: executing de

Re: Help needed on mipsel #541706: gpe-expenses_0.1.7-2+b1(mipsel/unstable)

Am Dienstag, den 18.08.2009, 18:09 +0100 schrieb Neil Williams: > On Sat, 15 Aug 2009 20:21:47 +0200 > Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > > > Package: gpe-expenses > > Version: 0.1.7-2+b1 > > Severity: serious > > > > There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > > > > > Automatic build

Help needed on mipsel #541706: gpe-expenses_0.1.7-2+b1(mipsel/unstable)

On Sat, 15 Aug 2009 20:21:47 +0200 Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > Package: gpe-expenses > Version: 0.1.7-2+b1 > Severity: serious > > There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > > > Automatic build of gpe-expenses_0.1.7-2+b1 on rem by sbuild/mipsel 99.999 There doesn't appear to

Re: Help needed with /etc/X11/config/cf

Hi, Please consider posting this kind of questions to debian-user@ instead of -devel, where this is off-topic. Anyway, as for your problem: On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 23:56:15 +0100, alexe...@iol.pt wrote: > Hi, > It is my first time i instaled debian. I am enjoying it very much. > I am trying to

Help needed with /etc/X11/config/cf

Hi, It is my first time i instaled debian. I am enjoying it very much. I am trying to compile jk6 using sour make[3]: *** No rule to make target `/etc/X11/config/cf/Imake.tmpl', needed by `xmkmf'. Stop. I think this error is due to this IRULESRC=/etc/X11/config/cf which exists in the jdl Ma

Re: Help needed with the GPG Key Signing Coordination page

Hi, On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 09:56:23PM +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote: > It is not a big time investment. The most time-consuming work consists in > regular cleanups (removing bogus entries and key signing requests that have > been satisfied). Maybe once per year, taking several hours of work (since >

Re: Help needed with the GPG Key Signing Coordination page

* Luk Claes (l...@debian.org) wrote: > Hi > > Ralf Treinen and I are looking for help with the GPG Key Signing > Coordination page. > > The GPG key signing coordination page at http://nm.debian.org/gpg.php > is primarily aimed at prospective contributors to find existing Debian > developers who c

Re: Help needed with the GPG Key Signing Coordination page

Hi, On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 08:51:42PM +0100, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote: > I'm quiet interested in helping out a bit, but for now undecided. > > > Ralf Treinen and I have been taking care of this page the last years but > > I want to focus on other tasks so we're now looking for one or two > > ad

Re: Help needed with the GPG Key Signing Coordination page

Hi, On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 08:40:03PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > Ralf Treinen and I are looking for help with the GPG Key Signing > Coordination page. I'm quiet interested in helping out a bit, but for now undecided. > Ralf Treinen and I have been taking care of this page the last years but > I

Help needed with the GPG Key Signing Coordination page

Hi Ralf Treinen and I are looking for help with the GPG Key Signing Coordination page. The GPG key signing coordination page at http://nm.debian.org/gpg.php is primarily aimed at prospective contributors to find existing Debian developers who can sign their key for the ID part of the NM maintaine

Re: [Pkg-fonts-devel] [libmagick9] Help needed defoma

On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 12:06 AM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > Imagemagick does use a static list of police. This could lead to problem and > user have already send bug report. > Could be possible to help us implementing a defoma script for imagemagick? It would be far far better to implement fon

[libmagick9] Help needed defoma

Tags: help Hi, Imagemagick does use a static list of police. This could lead to problem and user have already send bug report. Could be possible to help us implementing a defoma script for imagemagick? Regards Bastien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Re: Help needed for #377468

On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 03:50:21PM +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > Hi! > > I would like to ask for some help for the bug #377468, if possible, > please. Particularly from a mozilla-plugin wizard. > > The problem is that djvulibre in upstream is not linked against a particular > libXt > in or

Re: Help needed for #377468

On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 4:22 PM, Thomas Viehmann wrote: > Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: >> I would like to ask for some help for the bug #377468, if possible, >> please. Particularly from a mozilla-plugin wizard. > > Just having made this choice w.r.t. to nsdejavu and pthread for properly > fixing #504

Re: Help needed for #377468

[dropped even more CCs] roucaries bastien wrote: > It seems other plugins have the same problem. Should I open bug report? Well, that depends a bit: a) some of the symbols in your list (NS_*) might be from stuff that can reasonably be expected to always linked into things loading the plugins

Re: Help needed for #377468

Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > I would like to ask for some help for the bug #377468, if possible, > please. Particularly from a mozilla-plugin wizard. > The problem is that djvulibre in upstream is not linked against a particular > libXt > in order to adapt against different libXt version depending

Help needed for #377468

Hi! I would like to ask for some help for the bug #377468, if possible, please. Particularly from a mozilla-plugin wizard. The problem is that djvulibre in upstream is not linked against a particular libXt in order to adapt against different libXt version depending of the browser used. The ques

Re: help needed for free pascal (fpc) / lazarus

On Sat, 8 Dec 2007, Torsten Werner wrote: please have a look at . The package lazarus requires the sources of free pascal because it parses them. The obvious solution is to create a binary package fpc-source shipping the sources and add a

help needed for free pascal (fpc) / lazarus

Hi, please have a look at . The package lazarus requires the sources of free pascal because it parses them. The obvious solution is to create a binary package fpc-source shipping the sources and add a Depends or Recommends to lazarus. This i

Re: Help needed for bug #441794 on postgis

On Nov 13, 2007 9:12 AM, Fabio Tranchitella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The bug report is #441794, and here there is a quick summary: the package > provides a shared object (liblwgeom) which is used by postgresql for the > postgis-specific functions. With the last upload (a new upstream release) >

Re: Help needed for bug #441794 on postgis

On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 09:12:59AM +0100, Fabio Tranchitella wrote: > Hi fellow developers, > > I need some help to figure out how to fix an issue with the postgis > package, a PostgreSQL extension for handling spatial data. > > The bug report is #441794, and here there is a quick summary: the pa

Help needed for bug #441794 on postgis

Hi fellow developers, I need some help to figure out how to fix an issue with the postgis package, a PostgreSQL extension for handling spatial data. The bug report is #441794, and here there is a quick summary: the package provides a shared object (liblwgeom) which is used by postgresql for the p

Re: Help needed to fix watch file (Was: Bug#449736: wordnet: debian/watch fails to report upstream's version)

Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (07/11/2007): > The source tarball is provided as > > http://wordnet.princeton.edu/3.0/WordNet-3.0.tar.gz Since it is linked from … > Any idea whether the watch file is wrong or is it possible that the > upstream server j

Help needed to fix watch file (Was: Bug#449736: wordnet: debian/watch fails to report upstream's version)

On Wed, 7 Nov 2007, Raphael Geissert wrote: The debian/watch file of your package on the unstable distribution fails to report upstream's version. Uscan's message follows: uscan warning: In /tmp/wordnet_watchBHUkns, no matching hrefs for watch line http://wordnet.princeton.edu/(.*)/Word

ppp: co-maintainer and urgent help needed

I will not be able to spend much time on the ppp package before the release, so I am requesting help in triaging and fixing as many bugs as possible (the list is long, but let's only consider the ones opened this year) and uploading a new package ASAP. There is nothing actually *terrible* in the pa

Re: master mail problems -- help needed

On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 10:33:54PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Lionel Elie Mamane: > > > On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 09:30:52PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > > >> The fact that my primary MX is only available through IPv6, and that > >> this is the case for other people who're having problems

Re: master mail problems -- help needed

On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 11:57:58PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Lionel Elie Mamane: >>> You also have one IPv4-only MX, >> No, I don't. > But Exim 4 thinks so: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > router = dnslookup, transport = remote_smtp > host capsaicin.mamane.lu [2001:888:19f0::2]

Re: master mail problems -- help needed

* Lionel Elie Mamane: >> You also have one IPv4-only MX, > > No, I don't. But Exim 4 thinks so: [EMAIL PROTECTED] router = dnslookup, transport = remote_smtp host capsaicin.mamane.lu [2001:888:19f0::2] MX=9 host capsaicin.mamane.lu [2001:888:19f0:2::2] MX=

  1   2   3   >