Re: Help bts-link be a more effective tool

2009-01-21 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 01:04, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Bastien ROUCARIES > wrote: >>ll need I suppose cooperation from BTS itself but in a second >> time. We need only two user tags by foreign distrib: >> bts-link-foreign-xref-$distrib set to the foregin bugzi

Re: Help bts-link be a more effective tool

2009-01-21 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 09:46, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 09:17:06AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: >> Before you decide to push out errors to maintainers via PTS (as I've seen >> mentionned), you should really improve the tool so that the only remaining >> errors are reall

Re: Help bts-link be a more effective tool

2009-01-21 Thread Sandro Tosi
Hello Raphael, On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 09:17, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Sat, 17 Jan 2009, Sandro Tosi wrote: >> In recent bts-link runs, we noticed some errors. The log is available >> at [2]: please take the time to give it a look, search for your >> packages and check the situation. There are

Re: Help bts-link be a more effective tool

2009-01-21 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 19:54, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote: >> Hello, > >> If you feel something is missing, should be fixed or enhanced, let >> us[4] know; of course, patches are welcome ;) (git repo at [5]). > > I really useful stuff will be to

Re: Help bts-link be a more effective tool

2009-01-21 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 11:20, Frank Küster wrote: > "Paul Wise" wrote: >> Debian TeX Maintainers >>texlive-bin > > One was a typo in the upstream address. The other one, Thanks for fixing this. > E: pkg=texlive-bin, bug=351672, msg=Does not deals dupes: > [http://sourceforge.net/tracker/

Re: Help bts-link be a more effective tool

2009-01-21 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 10:12, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> E: pkg=update-manager, bug=415376, msg=Parse error: > [https://bugs.launchpad.net/update-manager/+bug/95168/] No product specified > but > bug affects multiple products > > That looks wrong to me. The error says "No product specified

Re: Help bts-link be a more effective tool

2009-01-21 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 03:21, Raphael Geissert wrote: > Hi, > > Sandro Tosi wrote: > [...} >> In recent bts-link runs, we noticed some errors. The log is available >> at [2]: please take the time to give it a look, search for your >> packages and check the situation. There are errors in that log

Re: Help bts-link be a more effective tool

2009-01-19 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: >ll need I suppose cooperation from BTS itself but in a second > time. We need only two user tags by foreign distrib: > bts-link-foreign-xref-$distrib set to the foregin bugzilla entry > bts-link-foreign-status-$distrib magically set by b

Re: Tracing bugs between distro's bugtrackers - Was: Re: Help bts-link be a more effective tool

2009-01-19 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Olivier Berger wrote: > Le lundi 19 janvier 2009 à 07:12 +0100, Christian Perrier a écrit : >> Quoting Bastien ROUCARIES (roucaries.bast...@gmail.com): >> > >> > I really useful stuff will be to use user tag in order to crossref >> > another distrib bugzilla. For

Re: Tracing bugs between distro's bugtrackers - Was: Re: Help bts-link be a more effective tool

2009-01-19 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Olivier Berger wrote: > Hi. > > Le dimanche 18 janvier 2009 à 19:54 +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit : >> On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote: >> > Hello, >> >> > If you feel something is missing, should be fixed or enhanced, let >> > us[4] know; o

Re: Help bts-link be a more effective tool

2009-01-19 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:40:13AM +0100, Olivier Berger wrote: > Did you mean "The bts-link is polluted", above ? No, I did mean the PTS. I've no idea whether that is true also for bts-link :) -- Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7 z...@{upsilon.cc,pps.juss

Re: Tracing bugs between distro's bugtrackers - Was: Re: Help bts-link be a more effective tool

2009-01-19 Thread James Westby
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 10:46 +0100, Olivier Berger wrote: > There would be some need for inter-distro work here, maybe... any ideas > on where to discuss that much welcome ;) distributi...@lists.freedesktop.org would be a good place to start. http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/distribut

Re: Help bts-link be a more effective tool

2009-01-19 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 7:46 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > BTW, when that is done, please submit a wishlist bugreport on the PTS > requesting integration, *together* with a description of the parsing > rules of the error output of bts-link OR maybe a switch to a format > which can be parsed out

Re: Help bts-link be a more effective tool

2009-01-19 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 7:12 AM, Christian Perrier wrote: > Quoting Bastien ROUCARIES (roucaries.bast...@gmail.com): >> On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote: >> > Hello, >> >> > If you feel something is missing, should be fixed or enhanced, let >> > us[4] know; of course, patches ar

Tracing bugs between distro's bugtrackers - Was: Re: Help bts-link be a more effective tool

2009-01-19 Thread Olivier Berger
Hi. Le dimanche 18 janvier 2009 à 19:54 +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit : > On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > Hello, > > > If you feel something is missing, should be fixed or enhanced, let > > us[4] know; of course, patches are welcome ;) (git repo at [5]). > > I really

Re: Tracing bugs between distro's bugtrackers - Was: Re: Help bts-link be a more effective tool

2009-01-19 Thread Olivier Berger
Le lundi 19 janvier 2009 à 07:12 +0100, Christian Perrier a écrit : > Quoting Bastien ROUCARIES (roucaries.bast...@gmail.com): > > > > I really useful stuff will be to use user tag in order to crossref > > another distrib bugzilla. For instance some bug are fixed on redhat > > like #506180 but not

Re: Help bts-link be a more effective tool

2009-01-19 Thread Olivier Berger
Le lundi 19 janvier 2009 à 09:46 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit : > The PTS is being polluted by tons of micro-parsers for the output of > the tools it monitor, a convergence at least on the surface syntaxes > would be nice to ease future maintenance. > Did you mean "The bts-link is polluted"

Re: Help bts-link be a more effective tool

2009-01-19 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 09:17:06AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Before you decide to push out errors to maintainers via PTS (as I've seen > mentionned), you should really improve the tool so that the only remaining > errors are really user errors. BTW, when that is done, please submit a wishlis

Re: Help bts-link be a more effective tool

2009-01-19 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Sat, 17 Jan 2009, Sandro Tosi wrote: > In recent bts-link runs, we noticed some errors. The log is available > at [2]: please take the time to give it a look, search for your > packages and check the situation. There are errors in that log that > might be ok, but others can refer to broken links

Re: Help bts-link be a more effective tool

2009-01-18 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Bastien ROUCARIES (roucaries.bast...@gmail.com): > On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > Hello, > > > If you feel something is missing, should be fixed or enhanced, let > > us[4] know; of course, patches are welcome ;) (git repo at [5]). > > I really useful stuff will b

Re: Help bts-link be a more effective tool

2009-01-18 Thread Raphael Geissert
Ben Finney wrote: [...] > > Since the problem is not with the package itself, but with an external > service, I think this would be better in DEHS. > DEHS-provided information is displayed in the PTS as well, as it is up to the package maintainer(s) or collaborators to "fix" it (either on the De

Re: Help bts-link be a more effective tool

2009-01-18 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote: > Hello, > If you feel something is missing, should be fixed or enhanced, let > us[4] know; of course, patches are welcome ;) (git repo at [5]). I really useful stuff will be to use user tag in order to crossref another distrib bugzilla. For in

Re: Help bts-link be a more effective tool

2009-01-18 Thread Frank Küster
"Paul Wise" wrote: > Debian TeX Maintainers >texlive-bin One was a typo in the upstream address. The other one, E: pkg=texlive-bin, bug=351672, msg=Does not deals dupes: [http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1425283&group_id=23164&atid=377580] I do not understand. T

Re: Help bts-link be a more effective tool

2009-01-18 Thread Mikhail Gusarov
Twas brillig at 10:12:26 18.01.2009 UTC+01 when po...@ubuntu.com did gyre and gimble: >>mercurial EPM> Looks like they're not using Trac anymore... Yes, moved to roundup. -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C

Re: Help bts-link be a more effective tool

2009-01-18 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Paul Wise wrote: > On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 6:36 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote: > >> In recent bts-link runs, we noticed some errors. The log is available >> at [2]: please take the time to give it a look, search for your >> packages and check the situation. There are errors in that log that >> might be o

Re: Help bts-link be a more effective tool

2009-01-18 Thread Ben Finney
Raphael Geissert writes: > What about generating a nice report page and making the PTS warn > when bts-link had troubles handling forwarded bugs of a given > package. Good idea. Since the problem is not with the package itself, but with an external service, I think this would be better in DEHS.

Re: Help bts-link be a more effective tool

2009-01-17 Thread Raphael Geissert
Hi, Sandro Tosi wrote: [...} > In recent bts-link runs, we noticed some errors. The log is available > at [2]: please take the time to give it a look, search for your > packages and check the situation. There are errors in that log that > might be ok, but others can refer to broken links, no more

Re: Help bts-link be a more effective tool

2009-01-17 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 6:36 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote: > In recent bts-link runs, we noticed some errors. The log is available > at [2]: please take the time to give it a look, search for your > packages and check the situation. There are errors in that log that > might be ok, but others can refer t

Help bts-link be a more effective tool

2009-01-17 Thread Sandro Tosi
Hello, as you might have seen (if you use the forwarded BTS feature) we have a tool, called bts-link[1], that help us track upstream bugs situation, tagging Debian bugs accordingly. In recent bts-link runs, we noticed some errors. The log is available at [2]: please take the time to give it a look