On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 09:46, Stefano Zacchiroli <z...@debian.org> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 09:17:06AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: >> Before you decide to push out errors to maintainers via PTS (as I've seen >> mentionned), you should really improve the tool so that the only remaining >> errors are really user errors. > > BTW, when that is done, please submit a wishlist bugreport on the PTS > requesting integration, *together* with a description of the parsing > rules of the error output of bts-link OR maybe a switch to a format > which can be parsed out of the box and is extensible, e.g., yaml.
Thanks Zack for the input, we'll evaluate yaml (or some other format). > The PTS is being polluted by tons of micro-parsers for the output of > the tools it monitor, a convergence at least on the surface syntaxes > would be nice to ease future maintenance. Since we'lll have to implement it from scratch, name one and we'll consider to stick to it. Cheers, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
