On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 2:19 PM Stephan Verbücheln
wrote:
> Looks like this needs a more general discussion to clear up the
> misunderstandings.
Please, please file a bug instead. I don't want to discuss package
change requests like this on debian-devel especially when you haven't
tried filing a
On Wed, 2025-02-26 at 10:27 -0500, Jeremy Bícha wrote:
> No. We are not going to build GNOME for Trixie without support for
> Xorg.
My question was neither of that.
1. Gnome can already be installed without Xorg in Bookworm and works
fine.
2. I was talking about removing specifically Xwayland (not
Am 26.02.25 um 16:27 schrieb Jeremy Bícha:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 10:10 AM Stephan Verbücheln
wrote:
According to reports and changelogs, Gnome 48 should be working without
Xwayland.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gdm/-/blob/main/NEWS
Can you remove the package dependency in Debian?
No. We
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 10:10 AM Stephan Verbücheln
wrote:
> According to reports and changelogs, Gnome 48 should be working without
> Xwayland.
>
> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gdm/-/blob/main/NEWS
>
> Can you remove the package dependency in Debian?
No. We are not going to build GNOME for Tri
According to reports and changelogs, Gnome 48 should be working without
Xwayland.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gdm/-/blob/main/NEWS
Can you remove the package dependency in Debian?
Regards
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
5 matches
Mail list logo
