Hi,
On 01.06.2013 16:56, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Uploader: Sven Eckelmann
Uploader is you, not "uploader" as in "person you want to grant upload
rights". That's also used for mail confirmation I believe. Having that
said, I'm no ftpmaster so I don't know what precisely went wrong (or if
it wo
Hi there,
I am trying to give Sven Eckelmann dm upload permission on
exactimage. Here what I did
1. read [1]
2. write a text file:
$ cat malat-1.dak-commands
Archive: ftp.debian.org
Uploader: Sven Eckelmann
Action: dm
Fingerprint: 522D7163831C73A635D12FE5EC371482956781AF
Allow: exactimage
Paul Wise:
> Could this be moved to devscripts as a dm command? Maybe with less
> dashes in the interface too.
>
> dm "Tobias Stefan Richter" allow foo bar , deny baz
Others have produced other objections, but I would object to the use
of a two-character command name for this.
Ian.
--
To UNSU
Am Mittwoch, den 06.03.2013, 13:46 +0100 schrieb Holger Levsen:
> Hi,
>
> On Mittwoch, 6. März 2013, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> > > > dcut dm --uid "Tobias Stefan Richter" --allow nexus
> > > Could this be moved to devscripts as a dm command? Maybe with less
> > > dashes in the interface too.
> > IMO
Am Mittwoch, den 06.03.2013, 18:03 +0100 schrieb Arno Töll:
> Hi,
>
> On 06.03.2013 13:46, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > On Mittwoch, 6. März 2013, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> dcut dm --uid "Tobias Stefan Richter" --allow nexus
> >>> Could this be moved to devscripts as a dm command? Maybe with less
>
Hi,
On 06.03.2013 13:46, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 6. März 2013, Benjamin Drung wrote:
dcut dm --uid "Tobias Stefan Richter" --allow nexus
>>> Could this be moved to devscripts as a dm command? Maybe with less
>>> dashes in the interface too.
>> IMO it's better to leave it in dput-n
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 7:46 AM, Holger Levsen wrote:
>>> IMO it's better to leave it in dput-ng and not moving it into
>>> devscripts.
>>
>> why? I don't want dput-ng (yet?) but I'd like to have a dm command in
>> devscripts. Whats your reas
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 7:46 AM, Holger Levsen wrote:
>> IMO it's better to leave it in dput-ng and not moving it into
>> devscripts.
>
> why? I don't want dput-ng (yet?) but I'd like to have a dm command in
> devscripts. Whats your reasoning not to?
It's up to people interested dcut(classic) to su
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 14:08 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 6. März 2013, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> > Fwiw since it is backwards compatible, dput-ng works fine from git in-place
> your point being?
I guess the point is that you can use dput-ng even if you don't want to
replace your "
On Mar 6, 2013 8:09 AM, "Holger Levsen" wrote:
>
> On Mittwoch, 6. März 2013, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> > Fwiw since it is backwards compatible, dput-ng works fine from git
in-place
>
> your point being?
If you don't want to, you don't have to purge the old dput, as you seemed
concerned about usi
On Mittwoch, 6. März 2013, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> Fwiw since it is backwards compatible, dput-ng works fine from git in-place
your point being?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archi
On Mar 6, 2013 7:46 AM, "Holger Levsen" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mittwoch, 6. März 2013, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> > > > dcut dm --uid "Tobias Stefan Richter" --allow nexus
> > > Could this be moved to devscripts as a dm command? Maybe with less
> > > dashes in the interface too.
> > IMO it's better to
Hi,
On Mittwoch, 6. März 2013, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> > > dcut dm --uid "Tobias Stefan Richter" --allow nexus
> > Could this be moved to devscripts as a dm command? Maybe with less
> > dashes in the interface too.
> IMO it's better to leave it in dput-ng and not moving it into
> devscripts.
why?
Am Mittwoch, den 06.03.2013, 08:13 +0800 schrieb Paul Wise:
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Arno Töll wrote:
>
> > dcut dm --uid "Tobias Stefan Richter" --allow nexus
>
> Could this be moved to devscripts as a dm command? Maybe with less
> dashes in the interface too.
>
> dm "Tobias Stefan Ric
Hi Paul,
On 06.03.2013 01:13, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Arno Töll wrote:
>
>> dcut dm --uid "Tobias Stefan Richter" --allow nexus
>
> Could this be moved to devscripts as a dm command? Maybe with less
> dashes in the interface too.
the command is part of our dcut ("Debi
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Arno Töll wrote:
> dcut dm --uid "Tobias Stefan Richter" --allow nexus
Could this be moved to devscripts as a dm command? Maybe with less
dashes in the interface too.
dm "Tobias Stefan Richter" allow foo bar , deny baz
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWi
>> Note, you can also use dput-ng (available in unstable) to manage DM
>> permissions. The equivalent command would be:
>>
>> dcut dm --uid "Tobias Stefan Richter" --allow nexus
>>
>>
I have had good luck with yodack to set DM permission as well:
https://github.com/algernon/yodack
Cheers,
ton
Hi Arno:
On Tue, 5 Mar 2013, Arno Töll wrote:
You missed the header. While the "Uploader" field is optional (and also
used for the mail confirmation you're missing by the way), the "Archive"
field is not. Moreover, the blank newline dividing the header from the
data part is required.
That is
On 03/05/2013 11:46, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> Please send error reports to the affected parties when executing or
> parsing a dak command file fails.
If you meet minimum requirements, dak will send an error message. But
dak and debianqueued only look at files that have a known extension
(e.g. *.dak-
Hi,
2013/3/5 Arno Töll :
> Ho Carlo,
>
> On 05.03.2013 07:42, Carlo Segre wrote:
>> 1. made a file called segre-0001.dak-commands with the following contents
>>
>> Action: dm
>> Fingerprint: 8CCC1BA8590FF029D17C708FC1BCD3C72AA28B6B
>> Allow: nexus
>
>
> You missed the header. While the "Uploader"
Ho Carlo,
On 05.03.2013 07:42, Carlo Segre wrote:
> 1. made a file called segre-0001.dak-commands with the following contents
>
> Action: dm
> Fingerprint: 8CCC1BA8590FF029D17C708FC1BCD3C72AA28B6B
> Allow: nexus
You missed the header. While the "Uploader" field is optional (and also
used for th
Hello All:
I have been a sponsor for a DM's uploads of the nexus package and we have
come across a new policy which defines a way of giving permission to a DM
for a specific package.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2012/09/msg8.html
I have studied the above thread and any
22 matches
Mail list logo
