On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Michael Gilbert wrote: > On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 7:46 AM, Holger Levsen wrote: >>> IMO it's better to leave it in dput-ng and not moving it into >>> devscripts. >> >> why? I don't want dput-ng (yet?) but I'd like to have a dm command in >> devscripts. Whats your reasoning not to? > > It's up to people interested dcut(classic) to support this use case. > If you like dcut(classic) better than dcut-ng, you may wish to > implement this feature.
Of course s/cut/put/g. Best wishes, MIke -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CANTw=MN+deEy=5owr-cjxtfs8ssctwb8oabqhaupqpoyjbw...@mail.gmail.com
