Re: DEP-18 v2: request for comments

2025-01-13 Thread Raphael Hertzog
(Sorry, replying to an old email) On Thu, 21 Nov 2024, Philipp Kern wrote: > That said: There hasn't been much innovation in this space so far - in a > way that was usable by Debian. Making builds something based off tasks > (e.g. in a pipeline) when a package is uploaded rather than diffing the >

Re: Helping improve git-buildpackage (Re: DEP-18 v2: request for comments)

2024-12-01 Thread Richard Lewis
Otto Kekäläinen writes: > Basically you can start by forking > https://salsa.debian.org/agx/git-buildpackage on Salsa and then start > hacking away on the things you want to improve. > > If you want to do Python coding, fixing this issue could be an easy > one to start with: > https://bugs.debian

Helping improve git-buildpackage (Re: DEP-18 v2: request for comments)

2024-11-29 Thread Otto Kekäläinen
Hi On Fri., Nov. 29, 2024, 15:20 Richard Lewis, wrote: > > Please also help Guido iterate on git-buildpackage so that it works > > well, is easy to debug, has good docs etc. Based on discussions in > > this thread there are a lot of people with misconceptions and > > polishing the docs would be t

Re: DEP-18 v2: request for comments

2024-11-29 Thread Richard Lewis
Otto Kekäläinen writes: > Please also help Guido iterate on git-buildpackage so that it works > well, is easy to debug, has good docs etc. Based on discussions in > this thread there are a lot of people with misconceptions and > polishing the docs would be the best action item right now. Happy

Re: DEP-18 v2: request for comments

2024-11-29 Thread Otto Kekäläinen
> I believe that Otto's lets-standardize-on-salsa effort is fundamentally > a good thing. Let's help him flesh out the details. Thanks! Please also help Guido iterate on git-buildpackage so that it works well, is easy to debug, has good docs etc. Based on discussions in this thread there are a l

Re: DEP-18 v2: request for comments

2024-11-21 Thread Simon Josefsson
Philipp Kern writes: > On 11/21/24 9:51 AM, Simon Josefsson wrote: >> I support going even further: I think the Debian build infrastructure >> should over time be moved over to Salsa pipelines. GitLab pipelines >> offer a lot of transparency, security and reproducability benefits >> compared to

Re: DEP-18 v2: request for comments

2024-11-21 Thread Philipp Kern
On 11/21/24 9:51 AM, Simon Josefsson wrote: > I support going even further: I think the Debian build infrastructure > should over time be moved over to Salsa pipelines. GitLab pipelines > offer a lot of transparency, security and reproducability benefits > compared to the current Debian buildds wh

Re: DEP-18 v2: request for comments

2024-11-21 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Otto Kekäläinen (2024-11-21 09:30:12) > > > collecting stats from Debian packages, using for example data points > > > that 13573 packages in Debian have explicitly a debian/gbp.conf file > > > already. > > > > I guess those data points include how many packages use salsa, with > > various

Re: DEP-18 v2: request for comments

2024-11-21 Thread Simon Josefsson
Otto Kekäläinen writes: > Hi all, > > I published a complete rewrite of the earlier draft as: > > https://salsa.debian.org/dep-team/deps/-/merge_requests/12 > DEP-18: Encourage Continuous Integration and Merge Request > based Collaboration for Debian packages I think this will be mor

Re: DEP-18 v2: request for comments

2024-11-21 Thread Otto Kekäläinen
> > collecting stats from Debian packages, using for example data points > > that 13573 packages in Debian have explicitly a debian/gbp.conf file > > already. > > I guess those data points include how many packages use salsa, with > various Gitlab features enabled. > > Since various Gitlab features

Re: DEP-18 v2: request for comments

2024-11-21 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Otto Kekäläinen (2024-11-21 05:40:37) > > > I published a complete rewrite of the earlier draft as: > > > > > > https://salsa.debian.org/dep-team/deps/-/merge_requests/12 > > > DEP-18: Encourage Continuous Integration and Merge Request > > > based Collaboration for Debian packag

Re: DEP-18 v2: request for comments

2024-11-20 Thread Otto Kekäläinen
Hi! > > I published a complete rewrite of the earlier draft as: > > > > https://salsa.debian.org/dep-team/deps/-/merge_requests/12 > > DEP-18: Encourage Continuous Integration and Merge Request > > based Collaboration for Debian packages > > > > If you are in favor of having this as a

Re: DEP-18 v2: request for comments

2024-11-20 Thread Richard Lewis
Otto Kekäläinen writes: > Hi all, > > I published a complete rewrite of the earlier draft as: > > https://salsa.debian.org/dep-team/deps/-/merge_requests/12 > DEP-18: Encourage Continuous Integration and Merge Request > based Collaboration for Debian packages > > If you are in favor o

Re: DEP-18 v2: request for comments

2024-11-18 Thread Fabio Fantoni
Il 18/11/2024 01:04, Otto Kekäläinen ha scritto: Hi all, I published a complete rewrite of the earlier draft as: https://salsa.debian.org/dep-team/deps/-/merge_requests/12 DEP-18: Encourage Continuous Integration and Merge Request based Collaboration for Debian packages If you a

Re: DEP-18 v2: request for comments

2024-11-18 Thread Andrey Rakhmatullin
On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 01:22:31PM +0100, Fabio Fantoni wrote: > Thanks to Salsa Admins, recently when I used salsa it went much better. > > While unfortunately I still had many cases where packages.debian.org did not > load the pages or took a long time, several cases still for wiki.debian.org >

DEP-18 v2: request for comments

2024-11-17 Thread Otto Kekäläinen
Hi all, I published a complete rewrite of the earlier draft as: https://salsa.debian.org/dep-team/deps/-/merge_requests/12 DEP-18: Encourage Continuous Integration and Merge Request based Collaboration for Debian packages If you are in favor of having this as a DRAFT in the DEP direc