Hello,
Andreas Tille, on Fri 07 Oct 2016 16:34:25 +0200, wrote:
> no idea why this thread is on private and publicly in BTS.
It's my fault, I somehow mixed the thread because one mail on -private
was an answer to the original public BTS thread :/
> On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 06:53:29PM +0200, Samue
Hi all,
no idea why this thread is on private and publicly in BTS. If you drop
private please CC me.
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 06:53:29PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Maybe we should
> put in the ftp-master process that an RM request for any kind of
> accessibility-related package shouldn't be
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 02:46:46PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
>
> On October 6, 2016 8:51:59 AM EDT, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 02:46:44AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> >>...
> >> As frustrating as occasional removal/reintroduction cycles are, they
> >are rare enough th
On October 6, 2016 8:51:59 AM EDT, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 02:46:44AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>>...
>> As frustrating as occasional removal/reintroduction cycles are, they
>are rare enough that despite the frustration when they occur it's
>really not worth the effort it
Le 06/10/2016 à 13:30, Bálint Réczey a écrit :
> Regarding dasher I did the last upload around the last freeze to keep
> it in stable
> and my plan was packaging new upstream for Stretch, but I was busy
> with other packages which require a transition thus should be ready
> this month.
>
> I'm so
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 02:46:44AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>...
> As frustrating as occasional removal/reintroduction cycles are, they are rare
> enough that despite the frustration when they occur it's really not worth the
> effort it would take to avoid them completely.
This assumes that
Hi,
2016-10-06 8:46 GMT+02:00 Scott Kitterman :
>
>
> On October 6, 2016 2:04:36 AM EDT, Samuel Thibault
> wrote:
>>Paul Wise, on Thu 06 Oct 2016 11:40:12 +0800, wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 12:53 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>>> > So if some of these packages is falling down, the
>>debian-ac
On October 6, 2016 2:04:36 AM EDT, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>Paul Wise, on Thu 06 Oct 2016 11:40:12 +0800, wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 12:53 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>> > So if some of these packages is falling down, the
>debian-accessibility
>> > team *has* to be notified so we can find a
Paul Wise, on Thu 06 Oct 2016 11:40:12 +0800, wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 12:53 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > So if some of these packages is falling down, the debian-accessibility
> > team *has* to be notified so we can find a solution. Maybe we should
> > put in the ftp-master process that a
On Thursday, October 06, 2016 11:40:12 AM Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 12:53 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > I do read the "work-needing" mails, so I would have seen it. There was
> > no single mail on the debian-accessibility list about dasher. I didn't
> > know it got removed from tes
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 12:53 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> I do read the "work-needing" mails, so I would have seen it. There was
> no single mail on the debian-accessibility list about dasher. I didn't
> know it got removed from testing or even that help was requested. Had I
> known it, I would ha
Hello,
Michael Biebl, on Wed 05 Oct 2016 14:54:19 +0200, wrote:
> I'm not sure why you think there was fighing going on.
> Mario was/is part of the pkg-gnome team and had SVN commit rights for a
> very long time.
>
> It's not like he couldn't have just uploaded the package instead. So I
> think i
(Cc-ing ftpmaster, debian-devel)
On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 07:05:09PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> (Cc-ing debian-a11y)
>
> Hi,
Hi Emilio,
> On 30/09/16 13:03, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> > While the patch would solve the RC bug and get dasher back into
> > testing, I'm hesitant to assi
13 matches
Mail list logo
