El 14/05/12 12:03, Martin Bagge / brother escribió:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2012-05-13 14:54, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
Wordpress upstream doesn't seem to be able to support a stable branch
long enough for us (and I don't blame them for that, we do know how
painful it
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 04:37:23PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
> > This reminds me: is anyone going to bring back vserver or openvz in some
>
> I'm for having openvz back, then.
Are you ready to do the required work?
> Can we have this in a separate thread, please?
Do we have any practical results
On May 14, Toni Mueller wrote:
> But in practice, it means that many users have to migrate, or abstain
> from upgrading. Or will lxc be completely ready for Wheezy?
No way, what is missing is important kernel features.
The only hope is that somebody will maintain a decent .deb repackaging
of the
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 03:53:25PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 04:23:27PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > This reminds me: is anyone going to bring back vserver or openvz in some
> > form?
> Ola Lundqvist had plans to do this in an
> OpenVZ-hosted repository.
Sounds goo
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 04:23:27PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 03:04:20PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
> > > to support in Debian; another is that it is really helpful for web
> > > applications to be able to give an entirely independent installation to
> > > each major site
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 04:23:27PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> This reminds me: is anyone going to bring back vserver or openvz in some
I'm for having openvz back, then.
Can we have this in a separate thread, please?
Kind regards,
--Toni++
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@l
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 03:04:20PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
> > to support in Debian; another is that it is really helpful for web
> > applications to be able to give an entirely independent installation to
> > each major site rather than trying to share the same code. For another
>
> Ack. That
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 09:56:17AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> packaging and security issues and is because we need N independent
> installations per server for different groups that can vary separately and
That's one reason why packaged versions of web apps are quite often
useless at my workpla
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2012-05-13 14:54, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> Wordpress upstream doesn't seem to be able to support a stable branch
> long enough for us (and I don't blame them for that, we do know how
> painful it is).
This pretty much sounds like the web browse
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 02:54:40PM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On sam., 2012-05-12 at 23:45 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> > Being forced to upgrade to a new major version by a stable security support
> > is
> > nothing we should force our users to. Debian stable is known for (usually)
> > pa
On 05/13/2012 05:32 PM, Russell Coker wrote:
> There are lots of people who choose Wordpress because it seems to provide a
> lot of features that other systems don't provide, which includes a
> significant
> set of free themes and plugins which are available from Wordpress.org (not in
> Debian)
On 05/13/2012 08:12 PM, Toni Mueller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 11:26:26AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
>> The value is the same as for most packages: it's easy to install and
>> easy to upgrade (I assume; I don't use Wordpress). Yes, the expected
>>
> if someone in Debian w
Jon Dowland writes:
> If we can't provide stable packages then I don't see what value we add
> by packaging it at all. I wonder what the ratio of wordpress+debian
> users is who use the package versus those that hand-install anyway, and
> whether that is something that could ever be feasibly est
On sam., 2012-05-12 at 23:45 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> Being forced to upgrade to a new major version by a stable security support is
> nothing we should force our users to. Debian stable is known for (usually)
> painfree updates and bugfixes only, not for shipping completely new versions
> wit
Hi,
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 11:26:26AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> The value is the same as for most packages: it's easy to install and
> easy to upgrade (I assume; I don't use Wordpress). Yes, the expected
if someone in Debian would want to make that effort, I'd say that
Wordpress and the li
On 05/13/2012 11:32 AM, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Sun, 13 May 2012, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> Yes, it's difficult to work out. I'd also be worried by the
>> (potential?) set of users who may just use Wordpress because it's
>> already packaged and who therefore assume that it's likely to be a
>> saf
On Sun, 2012-05-13 at 09:55 +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
> On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 11:13:05AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> > On Sun, 13 May 2012, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> > > Being forced to upgrade to a new major version by a stable security
> > > support
> > > is nothing we should force our users t
On Sun, 13 May 2012, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Yes, it's difficult to work out. I'd also be worried by the
> (potential?) set of users who may just use Wordpress because it's
> already packaged and who therefore assume that it's likely to be a
> safe option. Without that, they may just use something
Jon Dowland wrote:
>On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 11:13:05AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
>> On Sun, 13 May 2012, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
>> > Being forced to upgrade to a new major version by a stable security support
>> > is nothing we should force our users to. Debian stable is known for
>> > (usually) p
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 11:13:05AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Sun, 13 May 2012, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> > Being forced to upgrade to a new major version by a stable security support
> > is nothing we should force our users to. Debian stable is known for
> > (usually) painfree updates and bugf
On Sun, 13 May 2012, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> Being forced to upgrade to a new major version by a stable security support
> is nothing we should force our users to. Debian stable is known for
> (usually) painfree updates and bugfixes only, not for shipping completely
> new versions with a forced mig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Package: wordpress
Severity: grave
Version: 3.3.2+dfsg-1
[CC-in d-devel@l.d.o to discuss this]
Hi,
although I think the wordpress maintainer are doing all they can do to keep
wordpress in a good shape in Debian, I do not think that it is possible
22 matches
Mail list logo
