On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 04:23:27PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 03:04:20PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote: > > > to support in Debian; another is that it is really helpful for web > > > applications to be able to give an entirely independent installation to > > > each major site rather than trying to share the same code. For another > > > > Ack. That's also one factor driving the demand for virtual servers (xen, > > kvm, you-name-it). > > This reminds me: is anyone going to bring back vserver or openvz in some > form?
Ola Lundqvist <[email protected]> had plans to do this in an OpenVZ-hosted repository. > Otherwise, wheezy would end up with no containers. Xen does kernel > virtualization and thus takes an order of magnitude more memory, lxc is not > supposed to be secure (it provides a chroot with usage limits, but no > isolation). [...] User IDs and capabilities aren't yet properly namespaced. So you can't create a container-root user to manage the container from the inside, and you can't rent out a container as a VPS. That doesn't mean we have 'no containers'. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking. - Albert Camus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
