Re: Bug#393411: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D's

2006-10-18 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Note what packages fixed the problem in unstable, file an RC bug for >> the testing version and close it for the unstable version. That then >> reflects the reality and will keep track of the problem.

Re: Bug#393411: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D's

2006-10-17 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 03:49:54PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote: > > Note what packages fixed the problem in unstable, file an RC bug for > > the testing version and close it for the unstable version. That then > > reflects the reality and will keep track of the problem. > Hm, I know how to submit

Re: Bug#393411: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D's

2006-10-17 Thread Simon Josefsson
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> The second problem seems to be generic. The reason I looked at >> packages in testing was that they are the packages that are going to >> be released, and if I look at what's in unstable, it seems

Re: Bug#393411: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D's

2006-10-17 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The second problem seems to be generic. The reason I looked at > packages in testing was that they are the packages that are going to > be released, and if I look at what's in unstable, it seems that I > might miss what's going to be in etch (e.g., e2

Re: Bug#393411: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D's

2006-10-16 Thread Simon Josefsson
Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi Simon, > > On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 01:48:50PM +0200, Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > * Simon Josefsson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061016 13:19]: >> >> I went over many packages looki

Re: Bug#393411: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D's

2006-10-16 Thread Martin Zobel-Helas
Hi Simon, On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 01:48:50PM +0200, Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > * Simon Josefsson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061016 13:19]: > >> I went over many packages looking for names of likely non-free files, > >> and there may be

Mass-filing RC bugs about IETF RFC license based on file name (Was: Bug#393411: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D's)

2006-10-16 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Simon Josefsson] > Do you have suggestions to improve the situation? I would suspect manual inspection of each file, and only file bugs for the files with real license problems. Using the file name to guess about the existence of a serious bug is not acceptable. How many bugs did you file? A

Re: Bug#393411: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D's

2006-10-16 Thread Simon Josefsson
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Simon Josefsson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061016 13:19]: >> I went over many packages looking for names of likely non-free files, >> and there may be false positives. If this is the case for your >> package, I'm sorry for the noise. > > Sorry, but that is

Re: Bug#393411: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D's

2006-10-16 Thread Andreas Barth
* Simon Josefsson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061016 13:19]: > I went over many packages looking for names of likely non-free files, > and there may be false positives. If this is the case for your > package, I'm sorry for the noise. Sorry, but that is unacceptable behaviour. Cheers, Andi -- http:/