Re: Bug#318590: Bug#325643: libcurl and moc

2005-09-03 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 04:12:43PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote: > On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 04:04:27AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 12:24:18PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote: > > > > > - libcurl3 (GnuTLS, soname: libcurl.so.3) > > > > So the libcurl3 in

Re: Bug#318590: Bug#325643: libcurl and moc

2005-09-03 Thread Domenico Andreoli
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 04:04:27AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 12:24:18PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote: > > > > - libcurl3 (GnuTLS, soname: libcurl.so.3) > > > > So the libcurl3 in sarge and etch will have ABI incompatibilities? > > > at the release ti

Re: Bug#318590: Bug#325643: libcurl and moc

2005-09-02 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Sep 02, Paul TBBle Hampson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If I've understood correctly, it is because curl expects the client program > or library to -lgnutls or -lopenssl and therefore provide the SSL symbols > to match the symbols which that build of the .so file is expecting. I hope not, this

Re: Bug#318590: Bug#325643: libcurl and moc

2005-09-02 Thread Paul TBBle Hampson
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 04:04:27AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 12:24:18PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote: > > >> - libcurl3 (GnuTLS, soname: libcurl.so.3) > But no one has yet answered my question: *why* are there ABI differences > between the gnutls and op

Re: Bug#318590: Bug#325643: libcurl and moc

2005-09-02 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 12:24:18PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote: > > > - libcurl3 (GnuTLS, soname: libcurl.so.3) > > So the libcurl3 in sarge and etch will have ABI incompatibilities? > at the release time of etch this problem will regard only > external software. this kind of i

Re: Bug#318590: Bug#325643: libcurl and moc

2005-09-02 Thread Domenico Andreoli
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 11:56:13AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: > * Domenico Andreoli [Fri, 02 Sep 2005 11:16:28 +0200]: > > > - libcurl3-dev (OpenSSL, depends: libssl-dev) > > - libcurl3-openssl-dev (GnuTLS, depends: libgnutls-dev) > > Obvious typo/whatever here, right? On Fri, Sep

Re: Bug#325643: libcurl and moc

2005-09-02 Thread Domenico Andreoli
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 02:58:05AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 11:16:28AM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote: > > > ok, we are hooked into the libflac6 transition, let's start the curl one. > > > my wish is to upload curl 7.14.1 with the following package layout: > > > -

Re: Bug#325643: libcurl and moc

2005-09-02 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 11:56:13AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: > * Domenico Andreoli [Fri, 02 Sep 2005 11:16:28 +0200]: > > - libcurl3 (GnuTLS, soname: libcurl.so.3) > So the libcurl3 in sarge and etch will have ABI incompatibilities? If done right, I see no reason this should be

Re: Bug#325643: libcurl and moc

2005-09-02 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 11:16:28AM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote: > ok, we are hooked into the libflac6 transition, let's start the curl one. > my wish is to upload curl 7.14.1 with the following package layout: > - curl (OpenSSL, linked to libcurl-openssl.so.3) > - libcurl3

Re: Bug#325643: libcurl and moc

2005-09-02 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Domenico Andreoli [Fri, 02 Sep 2005 11:16:28 +0200]: > - libcurl3-dev (OpenSSL, depends: libssl-dev) > - libcurl3-openssl-dev (GnuTLS, depends: libgnutls-dev) Obvious typo/whatever here, right? > - libcurl3 (GnuTLS, soname: libcurl.so.3) So the libcurl3 in sarg

Re: Bug#325643: libcurl and moc

2005-09-02 Thread Domenico Andreoli
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 09:40:17PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > > On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 the mental interface of Daniel Stenberg told: > > > > The problem you have with libcurl and OpenSSL/GnuTLS is not strictly an > > "upstream problem". > > > > In the curl project there are some ideas floa

Re: Bug#325643: libcurl and moc

2005-09-02 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Aug 30, Daniel Stenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In my view, there's only one available work-around for the short to mid > term, and that is to use a separate .so file for libcurl built with GnuTLS. We know that in the long term we want to use gnutls. So why should it not be the default fo

Re: Bug#325643: libcurl and moc

2005-09-01 Thread Daniel Stenberg
On Thu, 1 Sep 2005, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: I bounced this message to debian-devel to force a solution with the curl ssl/gnutlds diverties. ... My resume on Daniels point of view is to get a different .so name for gnutls in the very short term and kick off ssl in Debian apps midterm! Tha

Re: Bug#325643: libcurl and moc

2005-09-01 Thread Elimar Riesebieter
Hi all, I bounced this message to debian-devel to force a solution with the curl ssl/gnutlds diverties. On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 the mental interface of Daniel Stenberg told: > Hi > > The problem you have with libcurl and OpenSSL/GnuTLS is not strictly an > "upstream problem". > > In the curl pro

Bug#325643: libcurl and moc

2005-09-01 Thread Daniel Stenberg
Hi The problem you have with libcurl and OpenSSL/GnuTLS is not strictly an "upstream problem". In the curl project there are some ideas floating around that are being discussed on how this could be fixed for Debian (and other distros) but that is only because they don't do it themselves, it