Re: ABI change in libsensors1 (from lm-sensors)

2003-05-16 Thread David Z Maze
Chris Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Why not kick upstream into releasing 2.7.1 with proper soname bump to > libsensors2 (Make sure they are aware they screwed up...). Then upload > libsensors2, there are only 8 sources depending on libsensors1 now so > it wouldn't be a big deal to rebuild t

Re: ABI change in libsensors1 (from lm-sensors)

2003-05-16 Thread Chris Cheney
Why not kick upstream into releasing 2.7.1 with proper soname bump to libsensors2 (Make sure they are aware they screwed up...). Then upload libsensors2, there are only 8 sources depending on libsensors1 now so it wouldn't be a big deal to rebuild those few in any case. Chris sources depending on

Re: ABI change in libsensors1 (from lm-sensors)

2003-05-15 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 01:32:02PM -0400, David Z Maze wrote: > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 01:45:30PM -0400, David Z Maze wrote: > >> (a) Repackaging lm-sensors 2.6.5, which would just have libsensors1 > >> 1:2.6.5-1, which in turn would Conflict: w

Re: ABI change in libsensors1 (from lm-sensors)

2003-05-13 Thread David Z Maze
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 01:45:30PM -0400, David Z Maze wrote: >> (a) Repackaging lm-sensors 2.6.5, which would just have libsensors1 >> 1:2.6.5-1, which in turn would Conflict: with any packages that >> have compiled against libsensors1 2.7.0 (