Re: Implementing feature requests for a package when a maintainer doesn't respond

2025-06-13 Thread Aaron Rainbolt
On Fri, 13 Jun 2025 16:43:45 +0200 Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote: > Hi Aaron, > > Quoting Aaron Rainbolt (2025-06-13 15:51:50) > > > thank you for your work! I see that the mails, the issue and the > > > bug report you opened did not get much of a reply and I agree > > > that that's not

Re: Implementing feature requests for a package when a maintainer doesn't respond

2025-06-13 Thread Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
Hi Aaron, Quoting Aaron Rainbolt (2025-06-13 15:51:50) > > thank you for your work! I see that the mails, the issue and the bug report > > you opened did not get much of a reply and I agree that that's not ideal. > > On the other hand, you also did not send a patch. I realize that you linked > > i

Re: Implementing feature requests for a package when a maintainer doesn't respond

2025-06-13 Thread Aaron Rainbolt
On Fri, 13 Jun 2025 10:06:30 + Holger Levsen wrote: > On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 02:42:33PM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote: > > I would recommend you first create a bug and an associated MR. > > Then, if you get no response (which is obviously different than a > > NACK), you can choose if you would

Re: Implementing feature requests for a package when a maintainer doesn't respond

2025-06-13 Thread Aaron Rainbolt
On Fri, 13 Jun 2025 07:36:41 +0200 Marc Haber wrote: > On Thu, 12 Jun 2025 14:31:02 -0500, Aaron Rainbolt > wrote: > >Some time ago, I did a lot of work on getting a U-Boot + > >grub-efi-arm64 boot flow to work on the Raspberry Pi 4 with Debian. > >I was able to get a proof-of-concept implementa

Re: Implementing feature requests for a package when a maintainer doesn't respond

2025-06-13 Thread Aaron Rainbolt
On Fri, 13 Jun 2025 10:18:59 +0200 Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote: > Hi Aaron, > > Quoting Aaron Rainbolt (2025-06-12 21:31:02) > > Some time ago, I did a lot of work on getting a U-Boot + > > grub-efi-arm64 boot flow to work on the Raspberry Pi 4 with Debian. > > I was able to get a pro

Re: Implementing feature requests for a package when a maintainer doesn't respond

2025-06-13 Thread HW42
Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues, 2025-06-13 10:18 +02:00: > Hi Aaron, > > Quoting Aaron Rainbolt (2025-06-12 21:31:02) >> Some time ago, I did a lot of work on getting a U-Boot + grub-efi-arm64 >> boot flow to work on the Raspberry Pi 4 with Debian. I was able to get >> a proof-of-concept impleme

Re: Implementing feature requests for a package when a maintainer doesn't respond

2025-06-13 Thread Holger Levsen
On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 10:06:30AM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/raspi-firmware doesnt give any indication > to me that the package is ripe for salvaging it. Hijacking it you could, > but you should not. > > Please don´t give bad advice on -devel. > > (The bug in qu

Re: Implementing feature requests for a package when a maintainer doesn't respond

2025-06-13 Thread Otto Kekäläinen
Hi, > I would recommend you first create a bug and an associated MR. Then, if you > get no response (which is obviously different than a NACK), you can choose if > you would like to salvage the package or if you would like to leave the MR > there for someone else who to to come along and salvage

Re: Implementing feature requests for a package when a maintainer doesn't respond

2025-06-13 Thread Holger Levsen
On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 02:42:33PM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote: > I would recommend you first create a bug and an associated MR. Then, if you > get no response (which is obviously different than a NACK), you can choose if > you would like to salvage the package or if you would like to leave the

Re: Implementing feature requests for a package when a maintainer doesn't respond

2025-06-13 Thread Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
Hi Aaron, Quoting Aaron Rainbolt (2025-06-12 21:31:02) > Some time ago, I did a lot of work on getting a U-Boot + grub-efi-arm64 > boot flow to work on the Raspberry Pi 4 with Debian. I was able to get > a proof-of-concept implementation to work correctly, and was interested > in upstreaming my wo

Re: Implementing feature requests for a package when a maintainer doesn't respond

2025-06-12 Thread Marc Haber
On Thu, 12 Jun 2025 14:31:02 -0500, Aaron Rainbolt wrote: >Some time ago, I did a lot of work on getting a U-Boot + grub-efi-arm64 >boot flow to work on the Raspberry Pi 4 with Debian. I was able to get >a proof-of-concept implementation to work correctly, and was interested >in upstreaming my wor

Re: Implementing feature requests for a package when a maintainer doesn't respond

2025-06-12 Thread Aaron Rainbolt
On Thu, 12 Jun 2025 14:42:33 -0700 Soren Stoutner wrote: > On Thursday, June 12, 2025 1:36:50 PM Mountain Standard Time Andrey > Rakhmatullin wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 02:31:02PM -0500, Aaron Rainbolt wrote: > > >However, since I haven't > > >gotten any response (no explicit "this wou

Re: Implementing feature requests for a package when a maintainer doesn't respond

2025-06-12 Thread Soren Stoutner
On Thursday, June 12, 2025 1:36:50 PM Mountain Standard Time Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote: > On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 02:31:02PM -0500, Aaron Rainbolt wrote: > >However, since I haven't > >gotten any response (no explicit "this would be good, send a patch and > >let's see what you have", no criticism

Re: Implementing feature requests for a package when a maintainer doesn't respond

2025-06-12 Thread Andrey Rakhmatullin
On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 02:31:02PM -0500, Aaron Rainbolt wrote: However, since I haven't gotten any response (no explicit "this would be good, send a patch and let's see what you have", no criticism or discussion, etc.), I don't know how to proceed. I don't want to submit a patch and have it igno