On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, Joerg Wendland wrote:
> Sure, but configuration of the samba package should be the
> responsibility of this package. What the Debian Enterprise project
> should do is to work with the samba maintainer to achieve this and
> maybe provide some sort of special configuration packa
Fabian Fagerholm, on 2003-12-04, 20:47, you wrote:
> The way Debian Enterprise has been described, it would provide you with
> this option. But you may also want to move "apt-get install samba" and
> the related session of tweaking samba's options to suit your network, to
> the install phase. Imagi
On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 15:20, Joerg Wendland wrote:
> When such a system is available, then having a "fileserver flavor" is
> just a matter of typing "apt-get install samba".
> So what I (and my clients) need is an operating system for the real
> big boxen. This is of course Debian but I expect of
Zenaan Harkness, on 2003-12-03, 14:58, you wrote:
> To give limits to Debian Enterprise/ User Linux we need to define some
> areas of focus.
>
> Flavours (and sub-flavours/ tasks/ yadda) is as good a place to start as
> any. So here are some proposed flavours:
>
> - Enterprise (base packages and
Zenaan Harkness said on Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 02:58:18PM +1100:
> Flavours (and sub-flavours/ tasks/ yadda) is as good a place to start as
> any. So here are some proposed flavours:
>
> - Enterprise (base packages and more "neutral" config)
> - Enterprise Desktop - with sub-flavours of:
> - S
(re-titled to - flavors)
To give limits to Debian Enterprise/ User Linux we need to define some
areas of focus.
Flavours (and sub-flavours/ tasks/ yadda) is as good a place to start as
any. So here are some proposed flavours:
- Enterprise (base packages and more "neutral" config)
- Enterprise
6 matches
Mail list logo
