On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 12:53:41AM +0100, Kieran Kunhya wrote:
> > Also ive offered my resignation in the past.
> > I do still offer to resign from the FFmpeg leader position, if it
> > resolves this split between FFmpeg and Libav and make everyone work
> > together again. I never understood why pe
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 03:20:49AM +0100, Anthony F McInerney wrote:
> Would the people who are claiming that blank cdr are cheaper than dvdr,
> especially in third world countries, please cite sources (shops, price
> checkers etc) of the price of say 5 pack or 10 pack, even up to 50pack of
> CD's,
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 04:38:16PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> The responses from the systemd maintainers are indeed on the terse side,
> but I can imagine that your style of bug reporting does not invite our
> volunteers to spend more time on it.
This is not a question of spending time. An up
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 05:03:00PM +, brian m. carlson wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 08:41:48AM +0100, Thomas Weber wrote:
> > And while we are at it, do we *really* need the information about
> > /bin/sh in at least a significant share of today's bug reports?
>
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 02:16:10PM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> I think it should be in every report. reportbug currently adds the kernel
> version and what /bin/sh points to, and for both of those it can just as
> well be argued that they are not relevant to the majority of bug reports.
> For t
On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 02:21:46AM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 11:25:48AM +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Moritz Mühlenhoff
> > wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > lcms needs to go for jessie in favour of lcms2 (#717928). (liblcms1-dev
> >
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:49:06PM +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2012-01-26, Thomas Weber wrote:
> > I'm currently creating symbol files for Octave in Debian. And quite
> > frankly, the way symbol files for C++ libraries are handled and
> > (especially) documen
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 08:08:07AM +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> >Am I missing some trick to make them useful?
>
> You miss pkgkde-symbolshelper written by the fabulous Modestas Vainius
> which is available in pkg-kde-tools.
>
> http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/symbolfiles.html
I'm currently crea
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 08:54:24PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> Where/how to apply to become a co-maintainer and a maintainer? The
> packages I'm interested into start with are: gnuradio and octave.
Octave is group-maintained, the group's list is at
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 07:42:07AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> I don't see what a discussion on -devel@ would bring. We are unlikely to
> come up with a better choice of solutions than what we already have
> (keep it on by default, revert the change and make it disabled by
> default).
Maybe thi
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 01:59:59PM +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> I am more concern about advanced users of scientific computing software
> (Scilab, R, Octave...) which are familiar with such tools but not
> familiar enough with the internals.
> They just see these software as a whole and would n
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 07:45:30PM -0400, James Vega wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:47:47PM +0200, Thomas Weber wrote:
> > How many packages are we talking about here? Is there a way to get the
> > number of packages that have the same version in Lenny and Squeeze?
>
>
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 10:34:32PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Wed, 26 May 2010 22:59:25 +0200
> Iustin Pop wrote:
>
> > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 10:43:36PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> > > On 05/24/2010 11:05 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>
> I think the announcement is wrong, we cannot ever
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 04:38:49PM +0100, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> Zitat von Marc Haber :
>
> Directly from www.debian.org (english, then German, then translated back):
> "it comes with over 25000 packages, precompiled software bundled up in a
> nice format for easy installation on your machine."
Hi,
I'm cc'ing debian-devel, so people see that there is an answer. If
whoever wants to continue the discussion, please strongly consider
dropping debian-devel -- the list is noisy enough.
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 12:06:06PM +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I, a maintainer of TeXmacs,
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 04:45:22PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Thomas Weber wrote:
> > You have x86 hardware that is so old that it doesn't run amd64, but at
> > the same moment you care about speed?
>
> It's not particularly hard to find new hardware with 32 bit A
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 08:32:09PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Feb 23, Thomas Weber wrote:
>
> > You have x86 hardware that is so old that it doesn't run amd64, but at
> > the same moment you care about speed?
> Why should I not care about speed if the h
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 04:01:51PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Feb 23, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>
> > Le mardi 23 février 2010 à 14:43 +0100, Marco d'Itri a écrit :
> > > Using non-PIC code for a 5% speed up looks like an acceptable trade off
> > > to me, but it really must be restricted only
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 10:23:33PM +0300, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
> I am asked to act as a sponsor of phpunit [*] package. However there's
> a situation that needs an advice. There's JS in the package that was
> run through the filter which deletes comments and spaces. In fact it
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 08:31:15PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 10:11:25AM +0100, Thomas Weber wrote:
> > > No, the problem is that certain of our French developers *think* that the
> > > rest of the world just doesn't understand t
Am Donnerstag, den 18.12.2008, 22:51 -0800 schrieb Steve Langasek:
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 01:04:05AM +0100, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
> > I am really speechless The French seem to have a completely
> > different understanding of the English language used in all these
> > matters than almost
Am Montag, den 15.12.2008, 10:06 + schrieb Steve McIntyre:
> I've been talking with Manoj already, in private to try and avoid
> flaming. I specifically asked him to delay this vote until the
> numerous problems with it were fixed, and it was started anyway. I'm
> *really* not happy with that,
Am Montag, den 15.12.2008, 00:31 + schrieb Steve McIntyre:
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 10:23:18PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> >Debian Project Secretary (13/12/2008):
> >>
> >>FIRST CALL FOR VOTES FOR THE Lenny Release General Resolution
> >>= === = === === = ===
Am Donnerstag, den 30.10.2008, 01:48 -0500 schrieb William Pitcock:
> On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 22:52 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > But regardless, Debian has promised that Debian is only free software.
>
> Then why does Debian have non-free? Is that not part of Debian?
"Thus, although non-fr
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:30:10PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Monday 27 October 2008 19:35, Frank Küster wrote:
> > If the PDF is frozen documentation, it's probably worth the effort. If
> > upstream changes the PDF with every new version, you should ask them for
> > their sources in
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 06:25:47PM +0200, Francis Tyers wrote:
> We've come up with a better solution, which is to add dependencies to
> the apertium package, and then make the apertium package depend on a
> particular version of pcre3. It's safer this way, as I can't find out
> anything about comp
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 01:47:15AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 01:15:44PM +0200, Thomas Weber wrote:
> > You are missing my point. We[1] got a reject for a documentation PDF
> > without source. So, we contacted upstream who checked the copyright with
>
Am Mittwoch, den 22.10.2008, 08:36 +0200 schrieb Bastian Blank:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 08:07:52AM +0200, Michal Čihař wrote:
> > At least ipw2100 drivers changed firmware name if they required
> > different version, so I guess this is also used by others...
>
> If they need an incompatible one.
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 05:06:29PM -0500, William Pitcock wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 09:03 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> > William Pitcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Unfortunately, those who contribute to Debian must be dedicated to
> > > ensuring future releases of Debian support the
Am Dienstag, den 21.10.2008, 12:57 +0200 schrieb Pierre Habouzit:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 09:04:21AM +0000, Thomas Weber wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, den 21.10.2008, 08:29 +0200 schrieb Marc Haber:
> > > On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:49:40 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG
> > >
Am Dienstag, den 21.10.2008, 08:29 +0200 schrieb Marc Haber:
> On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:49:40 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 22:26 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> >> No, really. The kernel team are volunteers. Ordering them to do things
> >> doesn't help
Am Freitag, den 25.04.2008, 13:16 +0700 schrieb Mikhail Gusarov:
> Twas brillig at 10:56:18 25.04.2008 UTC+08 when [EMAIL PROTECTED] did gyre
> and gimble:
>
> j> By the way, it would be great if the mirrors kept more than just a
> j> week of Diffs. It seems every time I get back from a trip, I
Am Dienstag, den 15.04.2008, 22:58 +0200 schrieb Raphael Hertzog:
> FTFBS on packages build-depending on libqt4-dev
> ---
>
> If your package is build-depending on libqt4-dev and is currently failing
> to build from sources, please wait for the next qt
Am Montag, den 10.03.2008, 11:24 +0100 schrieb Josselin Mouette:
> Le lundi 10 mars 2008 à 01:45 -0800, Mike Bird a écrit :
> > Hi Marc,
> >
> > "needed" has several similar but distinct meanings. None of the meanings
> > is more obvious than any other. "Need" I remind you that if you had taken
On 01/03/08 19:48 +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> There seems to be some crazyness about packaging new stuff these
> days. That would be fine.if only our existing packages were well
> maintained.which, for many of them is certainly not true.
Just for the record: every single package Rafa
Am Montag, den 25.02.2008, 13:42 +0100 schrieb David Paleino:
> On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:38:07 +0100, Thomas Weber wrote:
>
> > Am Montag, den 25.02.2008, 12:00 +0100 schrieb Holger Levsen:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Monday 25 February 2008 08:15, Aníbal Mons
Am Montag, den 25.02.2008, 12:00 +0100 schrieb Holger Levsen:
> Hi,
>
> On Monday 25 February 2008 08:15, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 09:07:20AM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > >We had a chicken[¹]. We spent years actively getting rid of it.
> > >[¹] Technically sp
Am Montag, den 14.01.2008, 17:22 +0530 schrieb Kumar Appaiah:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 11:49:05AM +0100, Thomas Weber wrote:
> > > Right, so a source tarball repack is needed.
> >
> > Which blas package is this? The one from netlib?
>
> Yes. Please see the late
Am Montag, den 14.01.2008, 10:41 + schrieb Colin Tuckley:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>
> > Source, as we ship the source too. For the (C)/license checks in NEW it
> > (*nearly*) doesn't matter if you ship it in the binary package or not.
>
> R
Am Dienstag, den 09.10.2007, 00:00 +0900 schrieb Michal Čihař:
> Hello
>
> Dne Mon, 08 Oct 2007 16:46:46 +0200
> Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napsal(a):
>
> > On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 02:39:59PM +, Michal Čihař wrote:
> > > BTW: When mentioning CMake, are there any known problems with p
Am Montag, den 17.09.2007, 20:33 -0700 schrieb Steve Langasek:
> Andreas,
>
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 10:46:00PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> > according to
>
> >http://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=blitz%2B%2B
>
> > there is no libatlas.so.3 available for arm which prevents blitz++
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 21.08.2007, 11:11 -0500 schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel:
> E.g. a good example of how it's nice to have the code in one place (as
> opposed to dozens of debian/rules files) is that just recently I learned about
> a neat x11 framebuffer server wrapper,
Which package is that? I mi
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, 5. Juli 2007 16:02:13 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > Am I misunderstanding what you're saying? octave2.9-htmldoc contains
> > this exact documentation that upstream is distributing.
>
> Yes, but built from source, and the source of octave2.9-htmldoc contains
> the texinfo so
Am Dienstag, 5. Juni 2007 14:20:40 schrieb Anthony Towns:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 12:07:52PM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote:
> > You could ask Anthony whether you're allowed to publish his reasons on
> > -legal. That would do the project a great favor.
>
> You could just ask me directly you know...
Am Dienstag, 5. Juni 2007 09:08:31 schrieb Frank Küster:
> Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 11:08:39PM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote:
> And a mail like
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=350624;msg=142;att=0
> is not only not-helpful-at-all, it's real
Am Montag, 4. Juni 2007 08:51:56 schrieb Arnoud Engelfriet:
Thanks for finding an english text.
> Just see EC Regulation 44/2001:
> "A judgment given in a Member State is to be recognised automatically, no
> special proceedings being necessary unless recognition is actually
> contested. A declara
Hi,
Am Montag, 4. Juni 2007 02:45:07 schrieb Wouter Verhelst:
> On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 05:09:57PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > On Mon, 04 Jun 2007, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> What I was trying to show is that the relevance of a copyright case
> brought against you in a jurisdiction outside of
Am Freitag, den 16.03.2007, 20:11 +0900 schrieb Paul Wise:
> On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 11:52 +0100, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
>
> > Instead of a GUI or a web interface, what I would love to have is a
> > curses-capable version of reportbug. As someone mentioned elsewhere in this
> > thread, browsing
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 11.01.2007, 23:32 -0400 schrieb Muammar Wadih El
Khatib Rodriguez:
> Ryuichi, may I take over the webmagick package?
>
> If you agree or don't reply, I'll take over the webmagick package.
Did you put Ryuichi's mail address in BCC (same goes for Luciano's
mail)? Otherwise
Am Montag, den 08.01.2007, 21:50 -0800 schrieb Will Lowe:
> Oh, and ... archive.debian.org doesn't seem to be rsync-enabled. Is
> there anyplace that has woody and *does* support rsync?
http://www.debian.org/distrib/archive.html
mentions several rsync sites.
Regards
Thomas
--
To UN
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 23.09.2006, 13:07 +0200 schrieb Bartosz Fenski aka
fEnIo:
> Please tell me what's wrong with *current* package and what can we do to
> make it better and stop saying me it's license issue.
IIRC, one of the things that lead to the rejection of the mplayer
package last time:
ht
Am Sonntag, den 10.09.2006, 21:22 -0700 schrieb Steve Langasek:
> For my part, I find it pretty offensive that a mailing list that's set as
> the maintainer of a package would have mail filters configured this way in
> the first place. For the samba packaging team, for instance, I've taken
> pains
Am Freitag, den 18.08.2006, 11:27 +0300 schrieb Riku Voipio:
> > http://www.movidis.com/products/rev.asp
>
> Has anyone contacted movidis/cavium of getting this system supported
> in etch? It would make a nice bullet in etch release notes :)
According to the linked informationweek article in Adri
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 17.08.2006, 10:52 +1000 schrieb Brian May:
> * In one case you can usually assume the maintainer got the message,
> in the other case you practically got confirmation that the message
> didn't get through.
>
> * If the maintainer doesn't respond, you can always send a ping
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 15.08.2006, 11:18 +1000 schrieb Brian May:
> Besides, it is yet-another message I receive and I have to process -
> keeping the message around for another week in case the moderator wont
> accept the message is highly annoying and probably will mean that the
> bug report gets
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 08.08.2006, 02:28 -0500 schrieb Alejandro Rios P.:
> .These fonts canNOT be used with X11 or for printing.
I suggest writing this as 'can NOT'. It's easier to parse and (with the
idea of descriptions' translations in mind) comes closer to what happens
in a translation -- at
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: octave2.9-forge
Version : 2006.03.17
Upstream Author : Paul Kienzle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://octave.sourceforge.net/
* License : Various (GPL, P
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: octave2.1-forge
Version : 2006.03.17
Upstream Author : Paul Kienzle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://octave.sourceforge.net/
* License : Various (GPL, P
Am Sonntag, den 25.06.2006, 18:11 +0300 schrieb Lars Wirzenius:
> I doubt we need a policy change for this. At some point, we need to stop
> legislating and start assuming the package maintainers have common
> sense.
Agreed. However, it might be a good idea to have *one* canonical
variable name fo
Am Sonntag, den 11.06.2006, 11:30 +0100 schrieb Mark Brown:
> That's a bit different: updating the debhelper compat level is updated
> by the maintainer explicitly changing the package rather than by
> installing a new version of debhelper.
Well, I certainly agree that it is a bug if CDBS changes
Am Samstag, den 10.06.2006, 15:38 -0700 schrieb Steve Langasek:
> Oh, I disagree; I think I have a pretty good idea what the benefits are of
> CDBS, I just think that many CDBS proponents underemphasize the *downside*
> of CDBS.
>
> So tell me, how do you know a priori whether the software you're
Hi,
first off, I'm neither a DD nor an NM, but I do some packaging work
(thanks to alioth), As most people here argue against CDBS, I think the
benefits of it are missed (if you didn't guess, I use it and I like it).
Am Freitag, den 09.06.2006, 15:10 -0700 schrieb Steve Langasek:
> On Fri, Jun 0
Hi,
is it possible for a 'building' package to send a mail to the buildd
admin of the current buildd machine (i.e. something like
[EMAIL PROTECTED])?
Reason: somewhere around Sep-Nov 2005, an alternative symlink was left
by the octave2.1 package in state 'manual'. This means that packages
build-
Am Sonntag, den 21.05.2006, 15:58 -0500 schrieb Raphael Hertzog:
> No, if we should discuss before taking any action we wouldn't get
> anything done.
Oh, come on. Nobody expects you to ask before updating a simple package.
> If you really want to contest the decision, you have the
> GR.
ROFL, ye
I don't have a particular opinion for Java in Debian or not, but there
are some points you raise:
Am Sonntag, den 21.05.2006, 12:34 -0500 schrieb Raphael Hertzog:
> In that case, ftpmasters accepted it, end of discussion.
Don't you think that the main problem here is that there *wasn't* any
disc
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 07.03.2006, 11:13 +0100 schrieb Jonas Genannt:
> > Eh, is this the same program that comes as "checklink" with the
> > w3c-markup-validator?
>
> Please see #263716 and #324028
Thanks for that one; as I'm using the checklink command, but not the
validator, I'm looking forwa
Hi,
Am Montag, den 06.03.2006, 22:31 +0100 schrieb Jonas Genannt:
> * Package name: w3c-linkchecker
> Version : 4.2.1
> Upstream Author : Hugo Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://search.cpan.org/~scop/
> * License : W3C Software License
>
Hi,
Am Montag, den 06.03.2006, 15:11 -0400 schrieb Ben Armstrong:
> On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 19:38 +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > It checks the User-Agent string.
>
> What are the expected results for a user accessing the following URL
> from IE running on a W2K terminal server?
I guess the orig
Am Montag, den 13.02.2006, 09:37 +0100 schrieb Xavier Roche:
> But I still consider documentation different than softwares, and don't see
> any major problem regarding the FDL.
Well, there are cases where the differences are totally unclear. Let's
start with PostScript files, go to interactive PDF
Am Donnerstag, den 09.02.2006, 12:50 +0100 schrieb Marco d'Itri:
> On Feb 09, Adam Borowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > There are two different definitions of the word software:
> > 1. something that can be represented as a finite stream of bits
> > 2. a computer program
> >
> > Definition 1
Hi Lionel,
Am Sonntag, den 29.01.2006, 22:11 +0100 schrieb Lionel Elie Mamane:
> What does that mean and how do I get out of this dead-end? Thanks in
> advance.
Does this one help?
http://svn.haxx.se/users/archive-2003-07/0133.shtml
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 17.01.2006, 18:56 -0500 schrieb Christopher Peterman:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: gtkedit
> Version : 0.1/b1
> Upstream Author : Daniel Guerrero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL or Web page : http://gtkedit1.sourceforge.net
> * License
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 17.01.2006, 18:20 +0200 schrieb Niklas Vainio:
> Please take a few minutes to answer the survey at
> http://hiisi.fi/survey/debian
Some suggestions:
Surveys from a university should have a place on the university's
webserver -- they look official.
Question 11 (income):
Is t
Hi
> First, what is DOG, I never heard about it.
"In the debian/changelog for octave2.9 (and all other packages maintained
collectively by the Debian Octave Group, the DOG)"
Start of Thread:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/11/msg01378.html
> Second, I'm a member of the debian-i
74 matches
Mail list logo
