On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 02:21:46AM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 11:25:48AM +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Moritz Mühlenhoff <j...@inutil.org>
> > wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > lcms needs to go for jessie in favour of lcms2 (#717928). (liblcms1-dev
> > > -> liblcms2-dev)
> > > The maintainer seems MIA, so I'm going ahead. Below is a dd-list of
> > > affected packages.
> > > This is a headsup as recommended by policy, I'll file bugs in a few weeks.
> >
> > Could you note that lcms2 have some ABI problem, and it seems we
> > should do a transition in newer version. See
> > http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/lcms.html
> > and #701993.
> >
> > So maybe we should made directly the transition to the new ABI ?
>
> Sorry for the late reply. I wouldn't hold my breath for the transition
> to the new ABI, so moving from lcms1 to lcms2 is probably more important
> for now.
I have uploaded lcms2 2.5 to delayed/7 yesterday. After consulting with
the maintainer, I have added myself as co-maintainer.
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140209120047.GA12676@t61
