ed in an update of the 2.6.8 kernel (which is being
> prepared at the moment).
If he produces a new kernel module to add support for this hardware,
there's absolutely no reason why it should conflict with linux-kernel.
Given that it's not a security fix, would he really have much luck
g
ule-assistant (can someone else help with a good example?)
Thanks,
Rob Taylor
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gt; Oh, Masayuki who maintains gs packages and I had thought same idea.
> It's very nice to have a place to collaborate together.
I'd certainly be interested in joining in on the printing love-fest.
Rob Taylor (libgnomeprint "maintainer")
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 10:44 -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 03:06:19PM +0000, Rob Taylor wrote:
> > Yes, that makes total sense. Would there likely be major objections to
> > this?
> >
>
> Even less (likely zero) testing of packages by the main
On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 15:27 +0100, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Hi, Rob Taylor wrote:
>
> > Do you think it might be better have a trusted builder keyring, with
> > strict rules on what makes a trusted builder (it seems rather a
> > different set of issues to that addre
ight be better have a trusted builder keyring, with
strict rules on what makes a trusted builder (it seems rather a
different set of issues to that addressed by the DD criterion)?
Thanks,
Rob Taylor
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I do not
> have the time required to be a good DPL.
I feel the need point out that the current DPL and one DPL candidate,
Matthew Garrett, havn't expressed support for this proposal in its
current form.
Rob Taylor
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
7 matches
Mail list logo
