On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 13:55 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > Op wo, 16-03-2005 te 12:09 +1000, schreef Anthony Towns: > I can understand these concerns, and they are valid; but there are > better ways to tackle them. Requiring that the machines are owned and > hosted by Debian Developers, rather than random non-developers, for > example, could be a better idea than to impose some arbitrary > restriction that has no real value; buildd hosts don't necessarily need > to be part of the debian.org network to be able to do what they need to > do.
Do you think it might be better have a trusted builder keyring, with strict rules on what makes a trusted builder (it seems rather a different set of issues to that addressed by the DD criterion)? Thanks, Rob Taylor -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
