Re: Forw/Re: Removal of systemtap from testing

Hi Lucas, On 28 July 2011 04:08, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > ... > What would help: > - subscribe to systemtap email notifications on the PTS > (http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/systemtap.html, see little box on the > bottom left corner) and contribute to the bug mail when you receive > some > - g

Re: coreutils with acl support

hey Christoph, On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 03:27:47PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 08:18:02AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote: > > libacl1 and libattr1 to base and required status. (Or demote coreutils > > Oh and btw, the depency on libattr1 is probably a bug. Since glibc 2.3

Re: coreutils with acl support

On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 08:18:02AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote: > (Please CC: me, I no longer track debian-devel) > > I am contemplating the upload of a version of coreutils that will have > support for file acls. (I.e., mv & cp -p will preserve acls, and ls -l > will indicate whether a file has an

Re: SGI's xfs

hi, On May 3, 9:28am, Radovan Garabik wrote: > Subject: Re: SGI's xfs > > > > And the kernel patches are in incoming. > > > > and how do you solve the requirement to use gcc version 2.91.66 > for compiling? > gcc-2.95.3 and current gcc-2.95.4 snapshot seem to compile the XFS kernel correc

Re: SGI's xfs

hi, On May 2, 8:34pm, Rahul Jain wrote: > Subject: Re: SGI's xfs > On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 11:03:09AM -0500, Nathan Scott wrote: > > > > In addition to Ed's kernel debs and the XFS userspace - ie. > > xfsprogs, xfsdump, attr packages - you'll also want a r

Re: SGI's xfs

hi there, On May 2, 11:22am, Ed Boraas wrote: > Subject: Re: SGI's xfs > > Previously Matthias Berse wrote: > > > Are there any plans in supporting the usage of SGI's xfs filesystem in > > > debian? Are there kernel patches available and/or userspace tools > > > being packaged? > > > > The usersp