hey Christoph, On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 03:27:47PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 08:18:02AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote: > > libacl1 and libattr1 to base and required status. (Or demote coreutils > > Oh and btw, the depency on libattr1 is probably a bug. Since glibc 2.3 > we have the xattr syscalls in libc (see /usr/include/sys/xattr.h)
Yeah, for some glibc versions its unnecessary now. We'll need libattr for preserving extended attributes in general case, so not really a big deal I think. Andreas is doing some library work at the moment that may end up needing a dependency between these two again, so I'll wait and see how that pans out before thinking about changes. cheers. -- Nathan
