On 11 August 2016 at 01:45, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 5:58 AM, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote:
>
> > When we talk about Cloud Images for OpenStack, both Ubuntu and CentOS
> > provides fixed URLs that never changes.
>
> BTW, there is a debian-cloud mailing li
Guys,
When we talk about Cloud Images for OpenStack, both Ubuntu and CentOS
provides fixed URLs that never changes.
This way, we can easily automate Glance to download images by demand, we
can have new images, without adding new images into glance!
Exemplifying:
CentOS 6/7 fixed image URL:
On 30 March 2016 at 14:52, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 10:05 PM, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
>
> > I think your message would be better addressed to the debian-devel
> mailing
> > list, who I have copied in to this reply so that more Debian Developers
> are
> > aware of it. (There's a
On 3 January 2016 at 03:52, ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 01:23:14AM -0200, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote:
>> It violates the FHS 2.3 standards.
>>
>> http://refspecs.linuxfoundation.org/FHS_2.3/fhs-2.3.html
>
> Can you cite the requirement in FHS 2.3 wh
On 3 January 2016 at 00:25, Daniel Reurich wrote:
> On 03/01/16 07:00, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>> On Jan 02, Geert Stappers wrote:
>>
>>> A design with "whole OS on /usr" breaks the good pratice of having
>>> tools like /bin/mount and /sbin/ifconfig available when /usr is unavailable.
>> This is not
On 30 December 2015 at 22:51, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> We have a reasonably tested usrmerge package which can be used to
> convert on the fly a system to merged /usr, and the good news is that
> there are only three packages which need to be fixed to work on a merged
> /usr system.
>
> Thanks to my c
On 5 February 2015 at 00:03, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
> On 02/04/2015 08:36 PM, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote:
> > Guys,
> >
> > I was facing a Linux BUG that was fixed only in 3.18.
> >
> > Here it is:
> >
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1362
On 4 February 2015 at 19:08, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> [Redirecting to debian-kernel]
Cool! Tks!
>
>
> On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 17:36 -0200, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote:
> > Guys,
> >
> >
> > I was facing a Linux BUG that was fixed only in 3.18.
>
> Did yo
Guys,
I was facing a Linux BUG that was fixed only in 3.18.
Here it is:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1362755
So, with Linux 3.16, it will not be possible to use Jessie to create a
"VLAN tagged Virtual Network" within a KVM hypervisor itself.
It will not route VLAN tagged packets.
> Lets build something like this:
> https://cloud-images.ubuntu.com/locator/ec2/ but, for Debian, of
> course... ?
> I can help.
>
> Cheers!
> Thiago
BTW, I'm maintaining an OpenStack Guide, here:
https://github.com/tmartinx/openstack-guides/tree/master/Juno
Within my guide, currently, I register
On 22 October 2014 11:58, Juerg Haefliger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>>
>> On 07/18/2014 07:49 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> >> [2] I contacted Steve McIntyre privately about it, but he didn't reply.
>> >
>> > Bugger, sorry. Must have missed the mail t
On 21 October 2014 02:21, Paul Wise wrote:
> Please do not use HTML mail on Debian lists.
>
> Please do not flame on Debian lists.
>
> https://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
> https://www.debian.org/code_of_conduct
>
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 1:34 AM, Martinx
gt; with triaging the bugs - finding reproducible test case also helps. Turn
> that urge into something productive. Flaming in the mailing list isn't
> helpful, it's exactly the oposite.
>
> Cheers,
> Ondrej
>
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014, at 21:00, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote:
>
>
But I need to act (at least, say something) to preserve our distro and I
cannot remain in silence. Sorry... This isn't intended to be fun.
Cheers!
Thiago
On 20 October 2014 16:57, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014, at 19:34, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote:
> > I really do NOT w
Sorry man... English isn't my native language, is hard for me to express
myself in another language... But yes, those sources aren't the best but,
there are more, you know. :-P
Best!
Thiago
On 20 October 2014 15:55, Axel Wagner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Martinx - ジェームズ writes:
Guys,
I really do NOT want to start a flame war, I know that you guys are tired
about this "init" subject appearing over and over... But, my turn...:-P
*First things first: Why I'm with Debian / Ubuntu?*
A.: Because *I like the work of Debian Maintainers* (you guys and gals,
sirs and madam
Hey Paul,
Thanks for your fast reply!
On 8 October 2014 00:30, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 12:26:07AM -0300, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote:
> >Hey guys!
>
> And gals!
>
Sure! :-D
> >I'm wondering here... Where are the E19 packages for Deb
Hey guys!
I'm wondering here... Where are the E19 packages for Debian?! :-P
I'm so tired of Gnome, Unity, KDE, XFCE, LXDE, Network Manager... hh!!
:-)
So, why not make a *near to perfect* E19 packages for Debian (or Ubuntu)?
Using Econnman by default, Terminology and etc... ???
Right
Hi!
Yes, please... I vote +1 for *not silently replace* sysvinit by systemd,
when upgrading from Debian 7, to 8.
Also, during Debian 8 installation, please, provide an "altinit" option (
http://pyro.eu.org/debian/pool/main/d/debian-altinit/ ?), so, people can
choose between systemd / sysvinit (
Hi!
I'm wondering here... Lets suppose I NEED to use sysvinit, with Debian 8.
If so, can I just run: `apt-get install sysvinit-core` to get rid of
systemd as my INIT?
If yes, will this be support until... Let's say, Debian kFreeBSD still
remains around...?
Also, why not have a system like "
20 matches
Mail list logo