Re: Please, provide a fixed Cloud Image URL for Debian

2016-08-15 Thread Martinx - ジェームズ
On 11 August 2016 at 01:45, Paul Wise wrote: > On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 5:58 AM, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote: > > > When we talk about Cloud Images for OpenStack, both Ubuntu and CentOS > > provides fixed URLs that never changes. > > BTW, there is a debian-cloud mailing li

Please, provide a fixed Cloud Image URL for Debian

2016-08-10 Thread Martinx - ジェームズ
Guys, When we talk about Cloud Images for OpenStack, both Ubuntu and CentOS provides fixed URLs that never changes. This way, we can easily automate Glance to download images by demand, we can have new images, without adding new images into glance! Exemplifying: CentOS 6/7 fixed image URL:

Re: Debian package on Windows

2016-03-30 Thread Martinx - ジェームズ
On 30 March 2016 at 14:52, Paul Wise wrote: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 10:05 PM, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > > > I think your message would be better addressed to the debian-devel > mailing > > list, who I have copied in to this reply so that more Debian Developers > are > > aware of it. (There's a

Re: support for merged /usr in Debian

2016-01-03 Thread Martinx - ジェームズ
On 3 January 2016 at 03:52, ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) wrote: > On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 01:23:14AM -0200, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote: >> It violates the FHS 2.3 standards. >> >> http://refspecs.linuxfoundation.org/FHS_2.3/fhs-2.3.html > > Can you cite the requirement in FHS 2.3 wh

Re: support for merged /usr in Debian

2016-01-02 Thread Martinx - ジェームズ
On 3 January 2016 at 00:25, Daniel Reurich wrote: > On 03/01/16 07:00, Marco d'Itri wrote: >> On Jan 02, Geert Stappers wrote: >> >>> A design with "whole OS on /usr" breaks the good pratice of having >>> tools like /bin/mount and /sbin/ifconfig available when /usr is unavailable. >> This is not

Re: support for merged /usr in Debian

2015-12-31 Thread Martinx - ジェームズ
On 30 December 2015 at 22:51, Marco d'Itri wrote: > We have a reasonably tested usrmerge package which can be used to > convert on the fly a system to merged /usr, and the good news is that > there are only three packages which need to be fixed to work on a merged > /usr system. > > Thanks to my c

Re: Jessie will need Linux 3.18!

2015-02-04 Thread Martinx - ジェームズ
On 5 February 2015 at 00:03, Thomas Goirand wrote: > > On 02/04/2015 08:36 PM, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote: > > Guys, > > > > I was facing a Linux BUG that was fixed only in 3.18. > > > > Here it is: > > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1362

Re: Jessie will need Linux 3.18!

2015-02-04 Thread Martinx - ジェームズ
On 4 February 2015 at 19:08, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > [Redirecting to debian-kernel] Cool! Tks! > > > On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 17:36 -0200, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote: > > Guys, > > > > > > I was facing a Linux BUG that was fixed only in 3.18. > > Did yo

Jessie will need Linux 3.18!

2015-02-04 Thread Martinx - ジェームズ
Guys, I was facing a Linux BUG that was fixed only in 3.18. Here it is: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1362755 So, with Linux 3.16, it will not be possible to use Jessie to create a "VLAN tagged Virtual Network" within a KVM hypervisor itself. It will not route VLAN tagged packets.

Re: Where to upload official OpenStack Debian images?

2014-10-28 Thread Martinx - ジェームズ
> Lets build something like this: > https://cloud-images.ubuntu.com/locator/ec2/ but, for Debian, of > course... ? > I can help. > > Cheers! > Thiago BTW, I'm maintaining an OpenStack Guide, here: https://github.com/tmartinx/openstack-guides/tree/master/Juno Within my guide, currently, I register

Re: Where to upload official OpenStack Debian images?

2014-10-28 Thread Martinx - ジェームズ
On 22 October 2014 11:58, Juerg Haefliger wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> >> On 07/18/2014 07:49 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> >> [2] I contacted Steve McIntyre privately about it, but he didn't reply. >> > >> > Bugger, sorry. Must have missed the mail t

Re: Remember when men were men and wrote their own init scripts? =)

2014-10-20 Thread Martinx - ジェームズ
On 21 October 2014 02:21, Paul Wise wrote: > Please do not use HTML mail on Debian lists. > > Please do not flame on Debian lists. > > https://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct > https://www.debian.org/code_of_conduct > > On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 1:34 AM, Martinx

Re: Remember when men were men and wrote their own init scripts? =)

2014-10-20 Thread Martinx - ジェームズ
gt; with triaging the bugs - finding reproducible test case also helps. Turn > that urge into something productive. Flaming in the mailing list isn't > helpful, it's exactly the oposite. > > Cheers, > Ondrej > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2014, at 21:00, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote: > >

Re: Remember when men were men and wrote their own init scripts? =)

2014-10-20 Thread Martinx - ジェームズ
But I need to act (at least, say something) to preserve our distro and I cannot remain in silence. Sorry... This isn't intended to be fun. Cheers! Thiago On 20 October 2014 16:57, Ondřej Surý wrote: > On Mon, Oct 20, 2014, at 19:34, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote: > > I really do NOT w

Re: Remember when men were men and wrote their own init scripts? =)

2014-10-20 Thread Martinx - ジェームズ
Sorry man... English isn't my native language, is hard for me to express myself in another language... But yes, those sources aren't the best but, there are more, you know. :-P Best! Thiago On 20 October 2014 15:55, Axel Wagner wrote: > Hi, > > Martinx - ジェームズ writes:

Remember when men were men and wrote their own init scripts? =)

2014-10-20 Thread Martinx - ジェームズ
Guys, I really do NOT want to start a flame war, I know that you guys are tired about this "init" subject appearing over and over... But, my turn...:-P *First things first: Why I'm with Debian / Ubuntu?* A.: Because *I like the work of Debian Maintainers* (you guys and gals, sirs and madam

Re: Enlightenment DR19 - Maintainers?!

2014-10-08 Thread Martinx - ジェームズ
Hey Paul, Thanks for your fast reply! On 8 October 2014 00:30, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 12:26:07AM -0300, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote: > >Hey guys! > > And gals! > Sure! :-D > >I'm wondering here... Where are the E19 packages for Deb

Enlightenment DR19 - Maintainers?!

2014-10-07 Thread Martinx - ジェームズ
Hey guys! I'm wondering here... Where are the E19 packages for Debian?! :-P I'm so tired of Gnome, Unity, KDE, XFCE, LXDE, Network Manager... hh!! :-) So, why not make a *near to perfect* E19 packages for Debian (or Ubuntu)? Using Econnman by default, Terminology and etc... ??? Right

Re: upgrades must not change the installed init system [was: Re: Cinnamon environment now available in testing]

2014-09-10 Thread Martinx - ジェームズ
Hi! Yes, please... I vote +1 for *not silently replace* sysvinit by systemd, when upgrading from Debian 7, to 8. Also, during Debian 8 installation, please, provide an "altinit" option ( http://pyro.eu.org/debian/pool/main/d/debian-altinit/ ?), so, people can choose between systemd / sysvinit (

Re: Jessie without systemd as PID 1?

2014-09-03 Thread Martinx - ジェームズ
Hi! I'm wondering here... Lets suppose I NEED to use sysvinit, with Debian 8. If so, can I just run: `apt-get install sysvinit-core` to get rid of systemd as my INIT? If yes, will this be support until... Let's say, Debian kFreeBSD still remains around...? Also, why not have a system like "