Re: bindv6only again

2010-05-08 Thread Kazuo Oishi
hen fix programs which depending bindv6only value (either 0 or 1). -- Kazuo Oishi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87eihlu989@molech.giraffy.jp

Re: Default value of net.ipv6.bindv6only should revert to 0

2010-04-07 Thread Kazuo Oishi
> system, if you really need it. Yes. But if any core applications were depend on bindv6only=1, we can not change it's value to 0 any more. So I wish that default value of net.ipv6.bindv6only revert to 0. -- Kazuo Oishi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debi

Re: Default value of net.ipv6.bindv6only should revert to 0

2010-04-07 Thread Kazuo Oishi
ends on bindv6only=0 might have a problem on portability and it might be a bug, but it should work with Debian as ever. Setting bindv6only=1 and breaking these programs, including outside of Debian packages, would not be a good choice. -- Kazuo Oishi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lis

Default value of net.ipv6.bindv6only should revert to 0

2010-04-06 Thread Kazuo Oishi
such meaningless incompatibility. If an application does not work with net.ipv6.bindv6only = 1, it does not mean that program is broken. But if an application does not work with net.ipv6.bindv6only = 0, it's broken as Linux application. ------