Vincent Danjean <vdanjean...@free.fr> writes: > And I see in these threads lots of things broken (including sun java that > it used/required for lots of software not necessarily packaged in Debian) > and no visible gains for users. > > I do not understand what is the purpose to say we will wait before taking > a decision. Either, we switched back to the previous (POSIX) setup (my > preference) or we stick with this setup but actively work to correct > the bugs in applications. I would find very strange if we release sqeeze > with a broken sun's java (even if it is non-free) and no good replacement.
I agree with Vincent. I still think that default value of net.ipv6.bindv6only should revert to old default value 0. I think that programs depending bindv6only=1 is more buggy. (Depending bindv6only=0 is less buggy.) We should revert net.ipv6.bindv6only value to 0, and then fix programs which depending bindv6only value (either 0 or 1). -- Kazuo Oishi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87eihlu989....@molech.giraffy.jp
