Joe Smith wrote:
Counter proposal:
New meta-package Boolean field.
Meta-packages would normally have few or no Depends, being almost
completely recommends.
Recommends (perhaps also Depends) of meta-packages are not marked as
automatically installed.
The usefulness of this part of my
"David Paleino" wrote in message
news:16193268.79mvg96...@home.hanskalabs.net...
Hello people,
per the DEP process described at http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep0/, this is
the first call for comments on this proposal.
Title: Meta-Package debian/control field
DEP: 6
State: D
"Manoj Srivastava" wrote in message
news:87my1uhtb7@anzu.internal.golden-gryphon.com...
On Mon, Dec 07 2009, Joe Smith wrote:
The net result here is that ucf may be keeping excess state related to
package foo.
But it is not. ucf knows well that when it is reinstalled
I suspect Patrick might be worried about a scenario like the following.
Lets assume there is a package Foo that depends on and uses ucf. Further the
package is the only one ucing UCF on the system.
At some point the admin decides to remove Foo. Since there are no other
packages that use ucf o
"Piotr Ożarowski" wrote in message
news:20091203235820.gf6...@piotro.eu...
Right now we're working on updating the Debian Python Policy. Once we'll
be happy with the first set of patches, we'll send them to debian-python
mailing list. I don't see a reason to make it public right now as it's
si
"Manoj Srivastava" wrote:
Virt-what is more accurate than Imvirt, version 1.0 can tell the
difference between Xen Dom0 and DomU. The new version (1.1, released
on 23 july 2009) can tell the difference between QEMU and KVM, and can
tell if you are running inside a Xen fullvirt guest.
Th
"Mark Brown" wrote in message
news:20090427092413.ga1...@sirena.org.uk...
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 01:48:27AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sun, 2009-04-26 at 21:41 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> #494120 and #494122.
[...]
I disagree with these as the tables in question are easily small
Don Armstrong wrote:
On Tue, 03 Mar 2009, Steve McIntyre wrote:
I've got to wondering: are the large -dbg packages actually really
useful to anybody?
Thoughts?
I think they are useful, but probably not for the vast majority of
users. [I've used them on a few dozen occasions.]
What I really
Joerg Jaspert wrote:
finger
It's been a while since I've seen a useful finger server, I think it's
fine
to drop this too.
db.debian.org, but that doesnt need it standard.
For what it's worth finger's local features are still important.
I've recently seen a professor explain to a class o
"Giacomo Catenazzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Hi,
As I mentioned in my blog[1], I kindof like the suggestion that Bdale
Yes, I find the talk very interesting.
So, after more than twelve hours of boredom on an airplane and half a
nig
"Brian May" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joe Smith wrote:
However, if the security updates come from trusted security mirrors
rather than
a general mirror, that attack would fail too. So with the exception of
Sid or
Testing users that do not
Andrei Popescu gmail.com> writes:
> How about distributing the Release files *only* from a trusted server?
>
> Regards,
> Andrei
That is problematic, as it does not deal with mirror synchronization properly.
If a mirror takes a few hours to update, it's Packages files may not be up to
date duri
Florian Weimer deneb.enyo.de> writes:
>
> * Ron Johnson:
>
> >
http://www.cs.arizona.edu/people/justin/packagemanagersecurity/attacks-on-package-managers.html
> >
> > What are people's thoughts on this?
>
> HTTPS doesn't help against non-trusted mirrors.
>
> The difficult question is how to t
"Marvin Renich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080701 20:45]:
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>> I mean the pending-write case is the most obvious. But what about
>> resolver
>> caches, VPNs and the like?
>
> What
"Mathieu Malaterre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
THANK YOU !
So far I only had FUDs about: 'no this is impossible, 'this is not the
right way'. Thanks for taking the time to answer in detail, this much
more supportive. I finally understood the previous aggressive answers,
I was simply looking at
"Bernhard R. Link" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Nikita Youshchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080626 11:51]:
To fix #486693, I need to apply a patch that changes #define'd macro in
an
exported library header.
The pattern is:
extern int foo(char *param1, int param2
"Joerg Jaspert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
c.) We can host an own archive for it under control of ftpmaster.
[snip]
So the way to go for us seems to be c.), hosting the archive ourself
(somewhere below data.debian.org probably).
[snip]
A data.d.o would presumably be running on a debian
"Michael Biebl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I guess Joss is right here. triggers tell you *if* something has changed
>(in a subdirectory), but not *what*.
Remember, that we have to call
gtk-update-icon-cache /usr/share/icons/$subdir
for the directory that has c
"Jonathan Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I was not sure if the image for Debian 4.0 downloaded completely. This is
why I feel >obliged to order it. I will be using Debian for GrADS and for
compiling FORTRAN >code. Can I get some recommendations f
"Andreas Tille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, Don Armstrong wrote:
So you do something like:
apt-get -o APT::Install-Suggests=true install foo; or similar.
[Though it probably should be an easier option, it is possible to do.]
Well, this
"David Paleino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Il giorno Fri, 22 Feb 2008 10:04:52 -0300
Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
As I said, for APT, the order has meaning _always_.
apt-get install foo bar
Is completely different of
apt-get install bar f
"Sebastian Pipping" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Would non-free be an option to all or some of them?
Do we have binary only packages in Debian?
My understanding is that it is possible to have binary-only packages in
non-free,
although I really don't know an
"Charles Plessy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Le Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 10:35:16PM -0800, Don Armstrong a écrit :
Unless the pdf is exceptionally complicated, it's not all that
difficult to resurect LaTeX that does a similar job; it'd probably be
ideal to do this a
Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Michael Banck wrote:
And there I thought we'd use whatever we like until wig&pen lands, which
will have native patch support.
What's the status of that? Is my assumption bad?
Not completely, I'm following the discussion closely
"Pierre Habouzit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well that wasn't what I understood, but I'm really not a D-Bus expert
at all :) Though it doesn't makes sense to let the D-Bus connector be a
separated component as you then only pull the library which is of a
reasona
"Pierre Habouzit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
That's wrong, and XML-RPC *SUCKS*, as does most of the text-only
interfaces, when you want real-time events. DBus isn't such a bad way to
do things, it doesn't requires the daemon up and running to interact
with netc
"Joel Franco" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
HEY SPONSORS.. PLEASE LOOK NETTEE :)
I'm guessing that sponsors are waiting for your acknowledgment and
correction of the issues mentioned in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2008/01/msg00034.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [E
"Joel Franco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- simplicity: like you already said, the simple command, without complex
pipe setups like showed in your example comments. You have to agree
with me that that netcat + tee pipe commands are not trivial. If I
had known
"Josselin Mouette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ubuntu discovered this a while back, and introduced a method to avoid
calling stop scripts in runlevel 0 and 6. It is the "multiuser"
extension to update-rc.d, and in Ubuntu packages are changed to calls
dh_installi
"Petter Reinholdtsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Joe Smith]
Obviously removing those scripts should have no impact on the other
initscripts.
Exactly, (unless there is a dependency relation between two scripts
and one of them is removed f
"Joel Franco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Joel Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: nettee
Version : 0.1.8
Upstream Author : David Mathog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://saf.bio.caltech.
"Petter Reinholdtsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Roger Leigh]
On a heavily loaded or slow system, I suspect it would be highly
likely some would get SIGKILL before they could shut down properly.
I can't say I'm a big fan of the proposal for this reason.
I d
"Enrico Tassi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 11:39:43AM +0100, Enrico Tassi wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 04:17:48PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
If you are inpatient, or want to test it before it passes the new queue,
Oops, I've just disc
"Sune Vuorela" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2007-10-21, Ben Goodger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--=_Part_8909_32361462.1192962485303
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
On 21/10/2007, Sune Vuo
"Clint Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 08:11:13PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
How about just using non-free for that? In the past, patented packages
like gif encoders have been hosted there, so why can't we just use them
for mpeg en
"Julien BLACHE" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've read that but I didn't take it into account because people google
for
docs and they will find documentation recommending apt-get (they usually
won't
notice if the doc
"Joe Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Don Armstrong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
So it seems like we should do the following:
1. Make changes to the menu system to use .desktop files in pre
"Don Armstrong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
So it seems like we should do the following:
1. Make changes to the menu system to use .desktop files in preference
to .menu files when they exist
2. Generate .desktop files from .menu files using the menu system when
"Michael Vogt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear Friends,
I plan to do an apt 0.7.2 upload for sid this weekend. It's a big merge
of the version in debian/experimental and the version in Ubuntu.
It will break the ABI, so all packages that depend on libapt will n
"Joerg Jaspert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 10927 March 1977, Mark Purcell wrote:
On Saturday 10 February 2007 01:34, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
Selection of the people included in those runs will be done in a way
that we avoid sending out such mails to active pe
"Frans Pop" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday 05 December 2006 22:25, Berke Durak wrote:
I will just say that in my opinion, a repository such as stable,
testing or unstable should be self-contained.
For stable and testing that is true. However, sid is broken by design as
it
"Jeremy Stanley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 09:14:19AM +0200, Mario Iseli wrote:
Ok, this is a good argument.
I think the oppinion is more or less clear:
Some people think it would be a nice idea, BUT it can be also a problem
because so
"Wouter Verhelst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 11:39:51AM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
"Joe Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So I really wonder why mailing lists are so common.
It sort of depend
"Sven Luther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 09:27:21AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Aug 30, Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Debian must decide whether it wants to ship BLOBs with licensing which
> technically does not permit
"Ben Pfaff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
No problem at all. Especially with gmane.org around. I used to
subscribe to dozens of mailing lists, but now I can just browse
all of them as newsgroups.
I agree, I use Gm
"Goswin von Brederlow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
On Aug 01, David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Also, pbuilder and debootstrap are considered absolutely critical for
serious work.
That's a bold statement.
--
c
"Daniel Dickinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, I intend to do an update-menu thing that calls 'fburn --gui',
which makes for a somewhat friendly interface from a window manager
menu or icon. Also it doesn't just blast out the image and hope it's
okay; unle
"Manoj Srivastava" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I see you have not fully followed through on reading policy
here:
,[ § 7.2 ]
| In case of circular dependencies, since installation or removal
order
| honoring the dependency order can't be established, dependency loops
|
"Manoj Srivastava" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 15:09:56 -0400, Joe Smith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Well, strictly speaking all circular dependencies could be
considered a policy violation because they depend on dpkg
"Ian Jackson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bill Allombert writes ("Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 5"):
Here the list of packages involved in circular dependencies listed by
maintainers.
Didn't we already have the conversation where we explained t
"Wouter Verhelst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 10:55:32PM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
Where should I ask for help? Neither buildd.debian.org nor
www.debian.org/devel/buildd, mention where the buildd admins can be
reached; and lists.debia
"Baruch Even" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
AIUI, there is no need to CC debian-devel with ITP's, as debian-devel
normally gets them anyway.
"Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
severity 195752 important
thanks
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 08:43:57PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
But yeah, I'm not in an official position to say, but if this
isn't considered a "critical" or at least "grave"
"Junichi Uekawa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I don't quite grok how I can make erfit be the default bootloader
> without access to MacOSX command-line to 'bless', I hope I can find
> out as I delve deeper.
You can't. Intel Mac blessing is different to traditio
"Bastian Venthur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Robert Lemmen wrote:
standard method. you will however find out that the size of all diffs
together is already less than the size of the regular packages file.
Yeah, looking at the average filesize of a diff compa
"Preben Randhol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 26 Jun 2006 21:35:19 +0200
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 09:20:34PM +0200, Preben Randhol wrote:
> With the 2.6 kernel programs using OSS for sound are not working
> anymo
"Petr Vandrovec" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Since this seems to have been an intentional behavior change by
upstream to better align with a published standard, I'm uninclined to
fight it, and think our best response is to update our utilities to
include the --wildcards option, with
"Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 01:18:11PM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
In cases where a security bug is being fixed, you usually try to
upload the package as soon as possible. If your sponsor is on
We did
"Wesley J. Landaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joe Smith wrote:
Is this really needed? Google was very careful in making sure that the
package installs in /usr/local, and does not interfere with the
system. Normally the main reason why a d
"Nikita V. Youshchenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ok, I agree that it's ok to trust installer source that they will not
install a backdoor into your system.
However, chances that they will write to directories that should be under
control of package manager, o
"Wesley J. Landaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Wesley J. Landaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: googleearth-package
Upstream Author : Wesley J. Landaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : (native packag
"Ian Jackson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jeremy Hankins writes ("Non-DD's in debian-legal"):
I'm not sure I understand this part, though. Do you think that folks
like myself, who are not DD's, should not participate in the discussions
on d-l?
Actually, I thi
"Martijn van Oosterhout" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 6/7/06, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Sure. SPI owns many of the machines that Debian owns. If any o
"Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Claiming that what Martin did was good since he was showing something
useful
for our community is equivalent to saying it was a "red team attack".
Nobody
used that term explicitly probably because t
"David Moreno Garza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Luca Capello wrote:
As a side note, while my passport was valid (re-newed the day before
leaving for Mexico because I forgot it was expired after 5 years and
not 10), I didn't get any Mexican seal when I arrived a
"Daniel Ruoso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Em Qui, 2006-05-11 às 09:56 +0200, Gabor Gombas escreveu:
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 03:33:45PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> Why would that not fly?
> Both versions of the arch-independent package could be installed a
"Adam Borowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 04:49:26PM -0400, Joe Smith wrote:
On the other hand, if we continue that thought process we could end up
with all headers and libraries in /usr/share/, which is absurd.
Why?
"Matt Taggart and others" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi debian-devel,
For a couple years now a few of us have been talking about an idea called
"multiarch". This is a way to seamlessly allow support for multiple
different
binary targets on the same system, for
"Lionel Elie Mamane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
apt-get source ${PACKAGE}
cp -R ${PACKAGE}-${VERSION} ${PACKAGE}-${VERSION}.pristine-deb
cd ${PACKAGE}-${VERSION}
# hack away
cd ..
diff --recursive -u ${PACKAGE}-${VERSION}.pristine-deb
${PACKAGE}-${VERSION} > d
"Raphael Hertzog" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It seems to me that it is unreasonable for the PTS to be updated before
the
policy package actually hits the mirrors.
There is a period of time after a package leaves incomming but before the
mirrors are updated when
"Frank Küster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
However, version 3.7.2.0 is neither in unstable nor at
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/
Both only have version 3.7.1.0. How comes that the PTS has a newer
version
th
"Rogério Brito" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi there.
I think that this may be interesting to anybody that has to work with
computers that are not the latest/more recent as most people in richer
countries seem to have.
It seems to be that a good amount of peopl
"Steve Langasek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 09:00:53PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
The alsa-utils package depends on python-minimal.
As a result, I must now have two versions of python installed. That's
a bug.
alsa-utils should de
"Steve Langasek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 09:32:52PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Seems to me that this should be at least a bug report on alsa-utils.
> I'm surprised that there would be a
"Andreas Tille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I'm the maintainer of libgtkdatabox-0.2.3.0-0. Until now there
was no request for an update of the upstream version and I had
personal reasons to stay with an outdated version. Now I was
asked to package the late
"Sven Luther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yeah, will use that nexty time. I don't know if native speaker realise
this, because many non-native speaker seem to have a fluent english, but
there
are times when the right words just don't come, and you are graspin
"Rene Engelhard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enforcing this policy to existing font packages is not in the top
priority of the team.
What is a policy useful for when most packages are not following it? I
think if there's a sane policy people should have to mi
"Henrique de Moraes Holschuh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 06 Mar 2006, Martin Schulze wrote:
Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
> Am Montag, 6. März 2006 18:29 schrieb Martin Schulze:
> > The Debian project happily announces the re-availability of the
> > packages.
"Jeroen van Wolffelaar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 07:42:12PM +0100, Joop PG4I wrote:
I have uploaded morse-2.1 about 2 weeks ago.
Nothing heard if it will get accepted or not.
Wondering what is going on Is ftp-master overlo
sorry, but i disagree with you on that. For me volatile is handling
packages with volatile data, not for handling packages the stable
release manager denys to take into a stable release.
I've not followed this bug but AIUI SRM has approved the package for the
next point release.
If the bug i
"MJ Ray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MFT is broken by design. No-one should expect to remote control other
people's mail clients. All one can do is ask and if you want to ask in
the headers, fine, but don't go flaming when it gets lost in the noise.
All of From
"Sergio Callegari" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have this directory on an Ubuntu system and it seems to be present
on recent Debian systems too...
It is on tmpfs.
Can anybody tell me what is its purpose (as many other distros don't
have it) and when it gets moun
"Philip Charles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have built up a fine-grained mirroring script over time which not only
selects the architecture but also the version (stable, testing etc) to be
mirrored. Unfortunately this script will require ftp/http access
to ..
Sorry to change the topic, but looking at some of the manpages in the
"manpages" package,
and some of the pages in the "manpages-dev" causes me no notice some pages
that look like they probably should be in a different package.
ld-linux(8)
ld-linux.so(8)
These probably belong in libc6 which ap
"Manoj Srivastava" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you do not know what GR's are currently open (despite mails
on -announce about them), asnd do not know how to simply look it up
on vote.debian.org, the subject matter is irrelevent to you anyway.
"Stuart Yeates" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the USA copyright can be enforced even on laws:
http://www.constructionweblinks.com/Resources/Industry_Reports__Newsletters/May_17_2004/supreme.html
I'm assuming that the legislation in question included the code
"Florian Weimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Chad Walstrom:
I'm trying to package up tex2page and noticed that there is no virtual
package for scheme-interpreter. I would like to specify in the
"Depends:" that some sort of scheme-interpreter is required inst
"Adeodato Simó" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can we please fast-track this clairvoyant NM?
Umm... I belive that is the policy. He needs to have his email read, and
then answer a few questions.
The process for returning emeritus Developers is intentionaly much
"Joey Hess" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
debconf
debconf-english
debconf-i18n
These are all necessary, and debconf is an essential package which is
not subject to the circular dependency postinst ordering problems afaik.
Well
"Michael Vogt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 01:22:50AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Michael Vogt]
> Sorry for the delay. I'm preparing a new upload that adds the 2006
> archive key to the default keyring.
Sounds good. Will this aut
"Marco d'Itri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Furthermore, /dev/shm is a mount point with a _very_ specific function.
It's a bad idea to start using it for something else.
Reality check: packages have been using it for a long time and the world
has not fallen yet
"Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I won't complain, I'll just send a friendly assassin to your house :-)
A friendly assasin? Is that the type that comes in, talks with you for a
while, and eventually offers you a poisioned beer?
--
To UNSUBS
"Steve Langasek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 03:46:12PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
You have failed to detail any particular difficulty that this causes,
I'm pretty sure I saw him do this already, by noting that it increases the
n
"Olaf van der Spek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 12/5/05, Joe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Olaf van der Spek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On 12/5/05, Ivan Adams <[EM
"Olaf van der Spek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 12/5/05, Ivan Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Example: (/etc/apt/sources.list)
deb http://ftp.en.debian.org/debian main stable contrib non-free
deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian main stable contrib non-free
Jérôme Marant said:
Quoting Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Jérôme Marant schrieb:
> Is it currently possible to upload amd64 packages to ftp-master?
No.
Well. Yes. Of course you can upload. They just get rejected. :)
Not good. What is missing to get this fixed?
Well There are two mi
"Chip Salzenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Who does a developer have to fuck around here to get his key deleted?
--
Chip Salzenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Wait. Ignore my previous post. I had forgotten that the resignation post was
indeed signed. It might howeve
"Chip Salzenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Who does a developer have to fuck around here to get his key deleted?
I'm not sure your resignation was valid. Most important debian mechanisms
require a signature from a key in the keyring.
It is hard for anybody
"David Moreno Garza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 15:23 -0800, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
Over the past five weeks
And guess how long will take to get your account removed.
Hmm... Doesn't a resignation require a message signed with a key on the
"Josselin Mouette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The documentation mentions that some compilers might need to be
executed as :
``CC=c89 CFLAGS=-O2 LIBS=-lposix ./configure''
But there is no posix library as far as I can make out in Debian, so
that won't do.
Y
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
