tomers use apt's
slickness, and perhaps they will... and we certianly wouldn't mind.
-=- James Mastros
--
First they came for the fourth amendment, but I said nothing because I
wasn't a drug dealer. Then they came for the sixth amendment, but I kept
quiet because I wasn'
buggy.
A soultion to number 1 that was tossed around included using libtricks to
get a list of files accessed, and is therefor (IIRC) obselete. (And in any
case is prohibitively slow.)
-=- James Mastros
--
First they came for the fourth amendment, but I said nothing because I
wasn't a
to use
them fairly easily, and lintian could allow them trivialy. (I would tend to
say that apt-get source shouldn't use them, as getting the source as a
reference, without wanting to compile it, is probably fairly common.
Anyway, that's a call for apt's maintaner.)
So how does this all
top1. gnome-utils 0.99.3-1 depends on it -- but gnome-utils 0.99.3-1 is
also obselete, but I cannot find a replacement, even though I have the
replacement installed! Is it still stuck in Incoming?
-=- James Mastros
--
First they came for the fourth amendment, but I said nothing because I
w
erstand -- but I assume that they are good). I'd suguest subtracting .01
from the debian-version and concatinating '.slink' to the end (somthing like
1.0-0.99.slink); that seems to be standard pratice.
-=- James Mastros
--
First they came for the fourth amendment, but I s
d significantly decrease the bulk of packages that
need to be upgraed (glibc-doc and libc6-dev especially).
-=- James Mastros
--
First they came for the fourth amendment, but I said nothing because I
wasn't a drug dealer. Then they came for the sixth amendment, but I kept
quiet because I
selete libraries is a Bad Thing when at all
avoidable.
BTW, debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org is the cannonical place to ask
debian-related gtk questions, and it's low-volume now that the Great GNOME
Copy is done. (CCed/Reply-toed there.)
-=- James Mastros
--
First they came for
space:]]\((alpha|arm|powerpc|m68k|sparc|hurd-i386)\)
/dev/null
This is more specific, and therefor less likely to catch other mail. (also,
I added hurd-i386 to the list -- forgot that one.)
-=- James Mastros
--
First they came for the fourth amendment, but I said nothing because I
wasn
autobuilders do it (with a source-only upload)?
-=- James Mastros
--
First they came for the fourth amendment, but I said nothing because I
wasn't a drug dealer. Then they came for the sixth amendment, but I kept
quiet because I wasn't guilty. Finally they came for the first amen
9 matches
Mail list logo