Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 06:39:31PM -0800, Gustavo Franco wrote:
>> Would it
>> be possible to add more fields if passing more flags
>> ?format=txt.gz&extra_fields=maintainer ... ?
>
> IMHO a quite flexible way to get the information yo
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 04:36:23PM -0800, Gustavo Franco wrote:
>> Do we have an up-to-date dump of packages metadata (name, version,
>> short and long description) somewhere in a similar form popcon is
>> gener
Do we have an up-to-date dump of packages metadata (name, version,
short and long description) somewhere in a similar form popcon is
generating and keeping its information available at popcon.debian.org
for download?
thanks in advance,
-- Gustavo "stratus" Franco
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to set up a selinux related release goal for
> Squeeze.
>
> Developer assiociated: Manoj Srivastava (Perhaps also Russell Coker,
> but I have not discussed this with him)
> Issues to
Agreed and please don't forget Eucalyptus[0].
[0] = http://eucalyptus.cs.ucsb.edu/
2009/3/28 Obey Arthur Liu :
> Edouard Nemours a écrit :
>> Dear List,
>>
>> i'd love to raise awareness of the fact that many companies and users of
>> debian hosts move their systems to "the cloud" (for instance a
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 6:40 AM, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Looking at http://popcon.debian.org/ >, it seem to me that the
> number of stable installations is dropping fast. The graph
> "popularity-contest versions in use" show this, with version 1.41
> being the one in stable.
>
> When the ver
On 8/9/07, Ben Hutchings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 11:20 -0400, Tim Hull wrote:
> >
> > We already have this on the desktop, from what I can
> > see (there is evidence of a
> > scaling-module-loading-thingummy running on boot)
On 8/9/07, Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 08 August 2007 23:02 schrieb Petter Reinholdtsen:
> > [Julian Andres Klode]
> >
> > > We should try to use binary packages provided by linux-modules-* or
> > > other modules packages by default and fallback to m-a.
> >
> > You migh
On 8/9/07, Luis Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Qui, 2007-08-09 às 14:10 +0200, Michael Banck escreveu:
> > On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 10:27:40AM +0100, Luis Matos wrote:
> > > Qua, 2007-08-08 às 20:30 +0200, Hendrik Sattler escreveu:
> > > > Additionally, it should be noted that a desktop task has
On 8/9/07, Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 10:27:40AM +0100, Luis Matos wrote:
> > Qua, 2007-08-08 às 20:30 +0200, Hendrik Sattler escreveu:
> > > Additionally, it should be noted that a desktop task has nothing with
> > > multimedia (means: surprise, you can use
On 8/9/07, Tim Hull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > My browser (iceweasel) does include .mov as a supported format. All the
> files I try to play open a player applet, but it does nothing. Trying to
> open them manually with Totem results in a "Video Codec Advanced Video
> Coding (H264) is n
On 8/9/07, Tim Hull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > - driver detection
> > We've driver detection, what's wrong with this feature in your use
> > case scenario?
>
> I was talking about driver detection with out-of-tree drivers that must be
> built with "module-assistant". It actually looks li
On 8/8/07, Tim Hull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> (...)
> >
> > It seems that we have no support for FAAC in main yet. Could you point
> > out a package, set of packages or upstream projects that I should look
> > for?
>
> I meant faad, sorry. Here's the main lib:
>
> http://packages.debian.org/u
On 8/8/07, Tim Hull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Tim,
> I'm a new (though fairly knowledgeable) Debian user and possibly a
> prospective developer. Anyway, though I do like Debian a lot, one thing is
> obvious - it lags somewhat behind as a desktop (or laptop) distribution as
> compared to
On 8/8/07, Tim Hull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Tim,
> > In addition, there is not reliable solution for suspend/hibernate,
> especially
> > from X. There still some way to go for X and the kernel to get to there.
>
>
> The bundled suspend scripts seem to be improving somewhat, but they need
>
On 8/1/07, Reinhard Tartler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> (...)
> > I tried the sample commands and apt wanted to add HALF A GIGABYTE of
> > unnecessary stuff!!! Others may consider hard disc space cheap but, in
> > truth, hard disc space is not infinite
On 7/10/07, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 09 Jul 2007, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Jul 2007, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Also, why don't we create a meta-package in the BTS for priority
> > changes?
>
> It would actually just be enough to create a set of usertags for
> priori
On 7/4/07, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 18:18 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 4, 2007 at 09:14:24 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>
> > I'm trying to find out who has responsibility for Bug #430646. It's a
> > critical bug, which should norma
On 6/28/07, Daniel Ruoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ter, 2007-06-12 às 10:26 -0300, Gustavo Franco escreveu:
> Any idea on how to collect more reliable data in a opt-in base? Does a
> survey on pentabarf (or public acessible) during debconf makes sense?
Huh How can "opt
On 6/27/07, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
as discussed on [EMAIL PROTECTED], we're looking for a copy of dpkg's old
arch repository used while Scott James Remnant was dpkg's maintainer.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-dpkg/2007/06/msg6.html
If anyone has a copy of it, pl
On 6/27/07, Frédéric PICA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Greets,
I have some interrogations about apt :
I want to develop a centralized system holding what packages operations
happened on a remote debian system (in a database).
I'm using the DPkg::Pre-Install-Pkgs apt option to get information about
On 6/12/07, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 04:40:54PM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> >* What do you mean by "switch unstable automatic nature to not
> > automatic"
> In a few words, move the 'NotAutomatic: yes'
On 6/12/07, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday 12 June 2007 21:40, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> > * What effect do you think removing experimental will have on
> > unstable? * How do you think it will have that effect?
> >
> I think it will have a positive eff
On 6/12/07, Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Gustavo Franco wrote:
> Hi Luk,
>
> On 6/12/07, Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Gustavo Franco wrote:
>>
>> (...)
>> > * Switch unstable (release) for not automatic updates
>>
>&
On 6/12/07, Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Gustavo Franco wrote:
> On 6/12/07, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Gustavo Franco wrote:
>> > Do you think that the numbers are positive in terms of testing usage,
>> > really? I see the numbers e
On 6/12/07, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Gustavo Franco wrote:
> Do you think that the numbers are positive in terms of testing usage,
> really? I see the numbers even if not that reliable as proof of my
> argument that just a few (almost half if compared with unstable)
On 6/12/07, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 10:29:59AM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> Considering that we know that experimental is not a full branch and
> there's no migration from experimental to unstable, do you agree then
> we could rem
Hi Luk,
On 6/12/07, Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Gustavo Franco wrote:
(...)
> * Switch unstable (release) for not automatic updates
They are only automatic as far as the Release Team wants them to be as
explained earlier...
I'm not writing about "automatic"
On 6/12/07, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Gustavo Franco wrote:
> Sorry, i forgot CUT it looks like a 0 proposal since it came first.
> How and when do you plan to start a team for that and have you
> considered who from other teams will need to join/agree on the
On 6/12/07, Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 1) The 'remove experimental' proposal
>
experimental is not a 'full' branch like stable, testing or unstable. It
only has a handfull of package built for it (at least that is what I
have seen from reading debian-devel-changes)
Also, there is n
On 6/11/07, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Gustavo Franco wrote:
> * testing metric is too simple, packages are allowed to enter testing
> only after a certain period of time has passed no matter if much
> people tested it before that and just when they don't have
>
I would like to ask you interested in our next release to stop and
look at 'testing' for a while. I believe that now, during the start of
a development cycle and during debcamp/debconf we've a interesting
opportunity to review pros and cons of our current approach.
We believe that 'testing' means
On 5/30/07, Joachim Breitner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I am wondering if anyone still uses the re-ordered ubuntu patches
provided by the Utnubu team at
http://utnubu.alioth.debian.org/scottish/
If nobody finds this useful, I'd probably do the alioth admins a favor
if I stop the cr
On 5/9/07, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
also sprach André Luiz Rodrigues Ferreira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.05.09.2249
+0200]:
> After some comments in debian-desktop list[1], the DebianArtwork Team[2]
> prepared the DebianArt.org site[3].
Why not art.debian.{net,org}?
Feel fre
On 5/9/07, Yves-Alexis Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On mer, 2007-05-09 at 17:49 -0300, André Luiz Rodrigues Ferreira wrote:
> What do you think?
> We think this is one of the available ways for a best desktop
Hmh, a nice idea would be to add preview thumbnails next to each item,
because
On 5/9/07, Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I've tried to craft an hypothesis about number of Debian users, from
apt-listbugs logs. I've analysed merkel.debian.org access logs. Since
etch was released, 3 unique IPs were used to access
merkel.debian.org using apt-listbugs. Accord
On 4/2/07, Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As some of you may have noticed, the patches.ubuntu.com website and
equivalent mailing of changes to the Debian PTS and ubuntu-patches
mailing list has been offline, or at least intermittent, for a few
weeks.
This was caused by the hostin
On 3/15/07, Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
I'm willing to present a Debian project proposal for the Google Summer
of Code [1] for implementing a web frontend for reporting bugs to the
Debian BTS. I'm volunteering for being a mentor for such a project. I've
expertise in th
On 2/6/07, Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Gustavo Franco a écrit :
> On 2/5/07, GNU/kFreeBSD Maintainers wrote:
>> Hello, Debian world!
>>
>> This is a status update for the Debian GNU/FreeBSD port[1]. This port
>> consists of two architectures:
On 2/6/07, Marco Amadori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alle 11:03, martedì 6 febbraio 2007, Daniel Baumann ha scritto:
> Gustavo Franco wrote:
> > Do you know if there is a way to build Debian GNU/kFreeBSD Live cd
> > images using live-package's svn tree ?
>
> un
On 2/5/07, GNU/kFreeBSD Maintainers wrote:
Hello, Debian world!
This is a status update for the Debian GNU/FreeBSD port[1]. This port
consists of two architectures: kfreebsd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64.
(...)
Do you know if there is a way to build Debian GNU/kFreeBSD Live cd
images using live-pac
On 1/28/07, Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10914 March 1977, Gustavo Franco wrote:
>> If you are applying for travel sponsorship, make sure you have entered
>> your full travel details and costs.
> Could you confirm that my form has enough information? I felt t
(...)
Reminder: DebConf7 Registration
---
(...)
If you are applying for travel sponsorship, make sure you have entered
your full travel details and costs.
Hi Moray,
Could you confirm that my form has enough information? I felt the lack
of feedback on this matter, si
On 12/20/06, Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 05:04:28PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
(...)
>>In case it's not obvious, the 3 arches picked for these discs are
>>simply the most common end-user systems out there. There is scope for
>
On 12/20/06, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Gustavo Franco wrote:
> Unfortunately, even the GNOME desktop environment doesn't fit on the
> CD#1.
True, but enough does fit to have a basically useable gnome desktop.
Right, but we need to make it clear for the users and
On 12/20/06, Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(...)
Gnome vs. KDE vs. XFCE
==
The KDE and XFCE variants of CD#1 are now being produced to give more
choice to people for initial installation. By default, CD#1 has always
meant to be enough to install a fully-functioni
On 10/29/06, David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 08:43:07PM +0200, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> Am Samstag 28 Oktober 2006 20:30 schrieb David Nusinow:
> > For etch+1, I'm planning on making it enabled by default and doing away
> > with most of the debconf stuff anyway th
On 10/28/06, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Saturday 28 October 2006 23:11, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> If there will be no regressions, please add the composite bit in the
> xorg.conf by default.
Is that really a good idea for something that is so young and untested, so
shortl
On 10/28/06, David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 02:30:19PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> If we're going to ship xorg with aiglx and composite enabled by
> default (actually i dunno really), beryl in etch and in default
> desktop environment (jus
On 10/28/06, David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 11:23:27PM +1000, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
> Given you're talking about cgwd, you prolly mean beryl (nee
> compiz-quinnstorm) rather than the original compiz which is
> in Debian.
>
> The beryl packaging is being unde
On 9/26/06, Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, devs...
I have tried the new Etch installer last weekend and I'm impressed. The
installation works perfectly well and the graphical installer - while it
doesn't add much value IMHO to the dialog based installer - looks nice and
will surel
On 9/26/06, Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[Christoph Haas]
> Currently the way to install KDE is to provide the option
> "tasksel/first=kde-desktop" when booting the Etch installer CD. No
> user will guess that.
Ah, is that how it is done. Thank you for the clue. It should be
On 9/3/06, David Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm writing this mail to you the developers to say thanks for the work
you put into Debian. I am really impressed at how polished etch as a
desktop OS is. Apart from the few odd things (mostly because I'm on
64bit and its still testing) its reall
On 8/1/06, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Le dimanche 30 juillet 2006 à 08:36 +0200, Christian Perrier a écrit :
> To be fair with Ryan here, I seem to remember that he mentioned (maybe
> not in the bug report) that he would consider making a Debian theme
> the default...if one gets
On 7/31/06, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
also sprach alfredo diega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.07.31.1616 +0100]:
> I really believe Debian would benefit if they had a weekly debate.
> I understand you debate on things you are voting on, but I think
> it could be better if you debated
Message sent to the related projects mailing lists and maintainers.
Time to deal with the goodies, pressure, critics and work...
regards,
-- stratus
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 7/31/06, Hubert Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 20:00:21 +0000, "Gustavo Franco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
[...]
> The packages that aren't under group maintenance and will never be,
> needs more not so strict NMU rules.
Why?
Due t
On 7/31/06, Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 10:37:54AM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
> At 1154196833 past the epoch, Michael Banck wrote:
> > It makes no sense to complain about this until we have a
> > good default artwork. So let's fix that first, then
> > convince
On 7/29/06, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 21:20:35 +, Gustavo Franco
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I'm not here for push "new upstream releases" into your packages,
> for example. We're talking about bug fixing and bet
On 7/29/06, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 20:00:21 +, Gustavo Franco
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On 7/29/06, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 16:27:26 +, Gustavo Franco
>> <[EMAIL PR
On 7/29/06, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 16:27:26 +, Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On 7/29/06, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 14:38:52 -0300, Gustavo Franco
>> <[EMAIL PRO
On 7/29/06, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 12:23:33 -0500, John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 05:44:38PM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote:
>> > If Debian had slightly less of a culture of "Keep your hands off
>> > my package", I'd do it here
On 7/29/06, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 14:38:52 -0300, Gustavo Franco
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> * Promote NMU LowThreshold wiki list giving it some official status.
What does this mean?
That you're out of date on what'
On 7/29/06, Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Thomas Viehmann [Fri, 28 Jul 2006 23:40:19 +0200]:
> If that is wanted, I'd consider it important enough information to have
> it in debian/control.
A couple packages of mine ship already with an X-VCS-Bzr header in the
source. Example:
On 7/28/06, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Le vendredi 28 juillet 2006 à 18:53 -0300, Gustavo Franco a écrit :
> Let us calm down and think twice before replying, please.
>
> Btw, it happened with a co-worker yesterday, i asked him to open a
> bug. I think you c
On 7/28/06, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Le vendredi 28 juillet 2006 à 23:10 +0200, Marco d'Itri a écrit :
> On Jul 28, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Happily you are here to innovate. For example, I love that kernel/udev
> > breakage in sarge to etch upgrades. T
On 7/28/06, Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
Gustavo Franco wrote:
> * The package that contains only the Maintainer field with the name of
> a person and not a group can be uploaded by any DD. ping the current
> maintainer is good but not required;
I propose
On 7/28/06, Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Gustavo Franco wrote:
> For existing packages:
>
> * The package that contains only the Maintainer field with the name of
> a person and not a group can be uploaded by any DD. ping the current
> maintainer is good but
On 7/28/06, Katrina Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Okay here is another honest question: Do you really honestly think not
having co-maintainers for base packages is ever a good idea? What if
someone is busy? You don't really feel safe noticing your base packages
aren't being co-maintain
On 7/28/06, Katrina Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I keep seeing your arguments about how some people want on;y a 100 MB system
by default. But you do give an option to have a Desktop, even Laptop
install. What not make those installs have better support for Desktop and
Laptop Users. For e
On 7/28/06, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
John Goerzen wrote:
> Think about it -- if you manage dozens, hundreds, or thousands of Debian
> machines -- few of which even have a monitor -- how useful is this?
>
> Debian is all about not making assumptions like this. If you want this
> featu
On 7/28/06, Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Gustavo Franco [Fri, 28 Jul 2006 14:38:52 -0300]:
> * Promote NMU LowThreshold wiki list giving it some official status.
And remember that (well done) NMUs are not only for bugs of RC severity.
For example, I'm going to uploa
On 7/28/06, Mario Iseli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi there,
(...)
I imagine if we would have a big CVS tree like Gentoo or some BSD's, i
wouldn't know where to begin with my work or what I sould do. The forest
is so large and you don't see the tree!
I don't think we need a central approach,
On 7/28/06, Tyler MacDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Personally, I have no problem with this. But if Debian is unwilling to
> fill these (not terribly niche) requirements itself, it's not reasonable
> to complain when people build on Debian in order
On 7/28/06, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
also sprach Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.07.28.1901 +0100]:
> This kind of task takes time and isn't well documented on how to
> do from scratch, but hopefully we will have another web tool
> (wotomae
On 7/28/06, Amaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
martin f krafft wrote:
> I am finding lots of interesting points in other people's replies.
Yes, I am also surprised about the civil tone (on most of the replies).
I've the same feeling, best thread in Debian mailing lists for me
after years and yea
On 7/28/06, Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Debian is all about not making assumptions like this. If you want this
> feature, you are free to install it.
And, while this makes Debian a wonderful choice for all sorts of things,
it means that
On 7/28/06, Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 07:22:11PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>> On Jul 28, Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > Debian stopped innovatin
On 7/28/06, Fabio Tranchitella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Pierre,
please don't Cc me, I read this list. :)
Il giorno ven, 28/07/2006 alle 19.28 +0200, Pierre Habouzit ha scritto:
> and that won't happen because I'm not very keen on leraning yet another
> VCS, and that other's think the same
On 7/28/06, Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, and we could start by really enforcing co-maintainership. Make it 100%
> mandatory for all essential, required and base packages at first.
Are there packages which are particularly well co-maintained right now?
What about debian-insta
On 7/28/06, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
also sprach Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.07.28.1838 +0100]:
> * Promote NMU LowThreshold wiki list giving it some official status.
> The developer needs to be logged and mark if all his packages (where
> he
On 7/28/06, John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 07:22:11PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jul 28, Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Debian stopped innovating?
> Yes. This should be obvious to people who joined the project
On 7/28/06, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please reply to -project only!
also sprach Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.07.28.1737 +0100]:
> If Debian had slightly less of a culture of "Keep your hands off
> my package", I'd do it here instead.
I've been thinking about this
On 7/28/06, Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 10:46:57AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> Debian is a project of volunteers. I am a Debian volunteer. I'm not
> going to write something just because you gripe at me about it. I have
> no obligation to you. I will wor
On 7/28/06, Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jul 28, Amaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Huge Troll Warning
It's sad that many people replied this way when it's obvious that Debian
has stopped innovating long ago.
But I suppose that this is part of the problem.
Debian stopped innovat
Katrina,
We accept crack pipe donations.
thanks,
-- stratus
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 7/19/06, Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2006-07-17 20:39, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> The Ubuntu distribution will be the first to make use of this new feature
No, i've told him (and jvw if i recall correctly) about the
scottwatcher's idea / PTS integration and they decided
On 7/19/06, Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2006-07-18 00:10, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> Thanks Scott, i'll stop scottwatcher and update the current page[0]
> with details about the new stuff.
>
> [0] =
> http://people.debian.org/~stratus/scottwatcher
On 7/18/06, Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The NEW queue is down to *22* packages, which is totally unheard of.
Only three packages have been waiting longer than a month -- so
Javier's package is no longer in the 'endless wait' state.
At the same time, the RM bugs are in fairly good
On 7/18/06, Denis Barbier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 05:33:45PM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> On 7/18/06, Denis Barbier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 10:39:18PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> >> Hello everybody,
>
On 7/18/06, Denis Barbier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 10:39:18PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> here are some news about the latest changes made to the Package Tracking
> System.
>
> New derivatives keyword
> ---
>
> The PTS will be
On 7/17/06, Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2006-07-17 20:48, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> On 7/17/06, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [...]
> > New derivatives keyword
> > ---
> > [...]
> > The Ubuntu
On 7/17/06, Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 06:59:41PM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-patches/
That's indeed great to address my concern but ...
> >A dumb way to implement that is of course s
On 7/17/06, Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 10:39:18PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> New derivatives keyword
> ---
> Each time that a new package is uploaded to Ubuntu, the PTS will receive
> the diff between the new version and the prev
On 7/17/06, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
New derivatives keyword
---
[...]
The Ubuntu distribution will be the first to make use of this new feature.
Each time that a new package is uploaded to Ubuntu, the PTS will receive
the diff between the new version a
On 6/30/06, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 11:54:42AM +0200, Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 15:14:07 -0300
> "Gustavo Franco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 6/29/06, Christian Perrier
On 6/29/06, Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 16:25:17 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Le mer 28 juin 2006 23:20, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
>> So you don't have any excuse to not update your packages any more.
>> About 60% of the Python modules have already been updated,
On 6/30/06, Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 15:14:07 -0300
"Gustavo Franco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/29/06, Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Software suspend which exists in kernel for several years?
On 6/29/06, Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
I've got hold of an intel mac that I'm interested in getting Debian
running. I've seen quite a few folks running Debian on MacBook Pro at
Debconf in Mexico, and I'm surprised that there aren't Debian
packages.
The things I'm planning on
On 6/29/06, Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Software suspend which exists in kernel for several years?
And works properly in Debian since what? Weeks? Months?:-)
It doesn't really work properly anywhere, does it? :-P
regards,
-- stratus
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO
1 - 100 of 189 matches
Mail list logo
