Bug#515785: ITP: bitlbee-skype -- Skype plugin for BitlBee

Package: wnpp Owner: David Spreen Severity: wishlist * Package name: bitlbee-skype Version : 0.7.1 Upstream Author : Miklos Vajna * URL or Web page : http://vmiklos.hu/project/bitlbee-skype/ * License : GPL v2 or later Description : Skype plugin for BitlBee

Bug#492931: ITP: python-ropemacs -- Plugin for performing python refactorings in emacs

Package: wnpp Owner: David Spreen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Severity: wishlist * Package name: python-ropemacs Version : 0.6c2 Upstream Author : Rope Developers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL or Web page : http://rope.sourceforge.net/ropemacs.html * License : GPL

Bug#486156: ITP: irssi-plugin-otr -- Adds off-the-record messaging support to irssi

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: David Spreen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: irssi-plugin-otr Version : 0.1 Upstream Author : Uli Meis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://http://projects.tuxfamily.org/group.pl?name=irssiotr * License

Getting packages out?

Hi there, I have splitted the lids packages into two packages per version. One who includes the kernelpatch and one the admintool. My problem i now uploading themwould cause problems and work because there would be conflicts with the existing lidspackages. Is it possible to get fast _all_ lidspac

KernelWarning

Is it possible to get make-kpkg adding A note to a kernel-image-package which is displayed when the kernel-image is installed? so long... David -- __ _ | David "netzwurm" Spreen Kiel, Germany / _|___ ___| |__ __ _ _ _ | http://www.netzwurm.cc/ [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: solution for lids-packages

Hi there, > Because I am not actually an official maintainer because my dam approvement > is Btw. this was really 'dam' approvement, not damn approvement :) There's no reason for me to curse, and I didn't want to, so let's forget it. so long... David -- __ _ | David "n

Re: solution for lids-packages

Hi there, On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 09:31:12AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 02:06:27AM +0200, David Spreen wrote: > > Because I am not actually an official maintainer because my dam approvement > > is > > not finished yet, > > There&#x

solution for lids-packages

Hi there, ok I will limit the lids packages to i386 to get them in woody. After the freeze I will make different packages for unstable with arch: any. Because I am not actually an official maintainer because my dam approvement is not finished yet, it's not easy to become access to the porters mach

Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat

Hi there, On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 07:38:18AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: > I think you've missed the point. We're not talking about what is going > to be the standard kernel image for woody. We're discussing the way the > kernel images are constructed on i386, which happens to only apply to > 2.4 at

Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat

On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 10:16:36PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: > With the latest release, it's now down to about 80MB. In any case, we > never release with more than one old kernel, nor with experimental kernels, > so that would be 1 x 2.2.x, and at most 2 x 2.4.x. This sucks. Hopefully not only in