Re: Bug#701536: RM: subsurface -- RoQA; unmaintained package, maintainer MIA

2013-03-03 Thread Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > > The license issue was just an example (hence the braces). The reasoning is > that the Debian packaging is supposed to be independent of upstream, > especially since we cannot always follow upstream, during a freeze, for > example. > Assume we

Re: Bug#701536: RM: subsurface -- RoQA; unmaintained package, maintainer MIA

2013-03-03 Thread Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > > > The maintainer seems MIA since June 2012, not responding to bug > > reports nor direct mails. > > The two most recent upstream releases not packaged. > > Why would this be a reason to *remove* a package? Especially after > such a short time

Re: Subsurface maintaince in Debian [was Re: Bulding 3.0.1 Under Ubuntu 10.04 i386]

2013-03-03 Thread Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > > As a Debian Developer and as a professional diver, I am interested to > help on this. That sounds great. Thanks for volunteering. > I have been in touch with Khalid to help him on this and he replied: > "No problem for to co-maintaince > > I'm sorry

Re: Bulding 3.0.1 Under Ubuntu 10.04 i386

2013-03-03 Thread Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn
Please keep me on the Cc: list, as I'm not subscribed. Sorry :( I have to pick this up again, as I screwed up last time and not much happened since I started this thread. Won't bother the subsurface mailing list with debian packaging details. On Fri, 1 Mar 2013, Christian PERRIER wrote: > > > Ol

Re: Bulding 3.0.1 Under Ubuntu 10.04 i386

2013-02-28 Thread Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn
On Thu, 28 Feb 2013, Robert Wolfe wrote: > > Um, forgot about me already, hmm? :) But, of course not. Do you want to be Cc:ed? > And yes, libdivecomputer-3.0.1 in .DEB format That should probably be: subsurface-3.0.1 and libdivecomputer-0.3.0 I presume. Can you make the sourc

Re: Bulding 3.0.1 Under Ubuntu 10.04 i386

2013-02-28 Thread Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn
Please Cc:, not subscribed to the debian-devel@lists.debian.org list. Hi there! Linus Torvalds is highly involved in this project :) On Thu, 28 Feb 2013, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > > The problem is that our target audience are divers, not hackers. Agreed. > Someone who can build from those sources

Re: Kernel weirdness

2003-10-10 Thread Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Derek Broughton wrote: > From: "Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > On Sun, 5 Oct 2003, Rob wrote: > > > > > I've installed the kernel-image-2.4.22-1-686 package. Until now, > > > I've been runn

Re: Kernel weirdness

2003-10-10 Thread Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Mark Ferlatte wrote: > Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn said on Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 06:42:53PM +0200: > > On Sun, 5 Oct 2003, Rob wrote: > > > > > I've installed the kernel-image-2.4.22-1-686 package. Until now, I've > > > been running the

Re: Kernel weirdness

2003-10-10 Thread Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn
On Sun, 5 Oct 2003, Rob wrote: > I've installed the kernel-image-2.4.22-1-686 package. Until now, I've > been running the 2.4.18-bf2.4 kernel. Though I didn't change what > modules I load, with this new kernel package have come a whole bunch of > new modules that are being loaded. I've run modconf

having troubles adding info to 1 and/or 2 an existing bug(s)

2003-08-31 Thread Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn
er in Japan) to get the buglist info. On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote: > > Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 08:28:32 +0200 (CEST) > From: Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: Where to find cdda_inteface.h and cdda_paranoia.h in ?

2001-01-01 Thread Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn
Retrieve the relevant Contents-${ARCH}.gz file and search: # wget ftp://ftp.se.debian.org/debian/dists/unstable/Contents-i386.gz # zgrep cdda_interface.h Contents-i386.gz Cheers, Cristian On 1 Jan 2001, Christian Marillat wrote: > "MM" == Michael Meding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >

would anyone like to package Secret Agent

2000-12-29 Thread Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn
http://www.vibe.at/tools/secret-agent/ GPL Secret Agent stores your secrets in a secure manner. Its main use at the moment is with GnuPG (an e-mail encryption/signation solution compatible to OpenPGP), or PGP 2.6. You can store your passphrase with Secret Agent, and have it provide that passphr

Re: Another Grub question/problem

2000-12-28 Thread Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn
On 28 Dec 2000, Brian May wrote: > > "Hamish" == Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Hamish> On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 03:23:52PM +1100, Brian May wrote: > >> still haven't tried 2.2.18. The video= options seems to be > >> completely ignored, and Linux boots up as if it wa

Re: wmaker build and AM_PROG_LIBTOOL

2000-12-24 Thread Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn
Answering my own question. Needed to install: libtool, libltdl0, libltdl0-dev, libproplist0-dev (maybe a little overdone). Cheers, Cristian On Mon, 25 Dec 2000, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote: > > I'm now getting regular X freezes. Only thing I can pick up is: > > /usr/bi

wmaker build and AM_PROG_LIBTOOL

2000-12-24 Thread Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn
I'm now getting regular X freezes. Only thing I can pick up is: /usr/bin/X11/WindowMaker fatal error: got signal 11 (Segmentation fault) from ~/.xsession-errors. Trying to rebuild an unstripped wmaker from source, but automake makes my life miserable: aclocal aclocal: configure.in: 15: macro `

Re: System sees only 65M of memory

2000-09-10 Thread Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn
Art, On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Art Edwards wrote: > I just purchased two Athalon-based systems, each with 768M of ram. > However, under debian (potato runnin kernel 2.2.17) the OS sees only 65 > M of memory. I have tried to use the append command > > mem=768M > > but it still sees only 65 M? > >

Re: imap mailbox killer

2000-08-31 Thread Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn
Funny side effect of the bug, here is the new "magic message" in my mailbox :-) Check out the "X-IMAP:" entry: ,- | From MAILER-DAEMON Thu Aug 31 17:15:15 2000 | Date: 31 Aug 2000 17:15:15 +0200 | From: Mail System Internal Data <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Subject: DON'T DELETE THIS MESSAGE -- FOL

Re: imap mailbox killer

2000-08-31 Thread Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn
of NULL characters preceeding a few (5-6) of the messages in some boxes. Hope this helps to find the problem. There's definitely a BUG lurking somewhere. Cheers, Cristian On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote: > On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, +00:52:25 EEST (UTC +0300), > Cristian Ionescu

imap mailbox killer

2000-08-30 Thread Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn
Package: imap Version: 4.7c-1 (Juhapekka Tolvanen's messages may be found on these mailing lists: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-legal@lists.debian.org) Man, you got great headers on your messages! I don't know if it was your intension, but you managed to totally screw up my inbox (no hard