On Sun, 3 Mar 2013, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > > As a Debian Developer and as a professional diver, I am interested to > help on this.
That sounds great. Thanks for volunteering. > I have been in touch with Khalid to help him on this and he replied: > "No problem for to co-maintaince > > I'm sorry, but I've been very busy the last few months. > " > > As Christian proposed, I am sure we can be move this package in the > sport team. By all means. Will join that list shortly. Would you, please, do the honors ;) > Cristian, if you want, we can work together to improve the package and > maintain new releases for Jessie. Of course. Which means new packages will go to unstable/experimental. Would it be possible to make back-porting to wheezy as painless as possible? But, bare in mind, although I can often find my way around debian packages, I'm neither a maintainer nor a developer. But I'll try to do whatever I can. I hope some other people on the subsurface list want to help too. > FYI, I reported some bugs on these two packages: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?repeatmerged=no&src=libdivecomputer Adding a symbol list file may probably be a good idea, I guess, bu you know better. > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?repeatmerged=no&src=subsurface Yes. I read the comments. The upstream maintainers expressed their wish to have subsurface statically built against libdivecomputer, as ABI changes occured frequently, but if you think package maintenance is easier with shared linking, I'm almost sure there'll not be too many protests :) Cheers, -- Cristian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/alpine.deb.2.02.1303031735530.11...@znkvzvyvna.pvv.fr
