On Friday 04 March 2005 17:47, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
> > Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Source code is source code. Obfuscated or not does not change that. It
> > > fullfills at least the letter of DFSG#2. For it to violate DFSG#2 you
> > > would have t
On Thursday 02 December 2004 07:53, Christian Perrier wrote:
>
> The package is currently sexist, in my opinion. I just hope that
> saying this loud enough will make the maintainers change their
> mind. If it does not, well the result will be another sexist thing in
> free software.
>
LOL, the pack
On Wednesday 01 December 2004 01:17, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 01:06 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 01:58:45PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 20:26 +0100, Eric Lavarde wrote:
> > > > Hi again,
> > > >
> > > > perhaps to bring down t
On Friday 20 June 2003 15:40, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 02:25:52PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > As i686 is already like ten(?) years old,
>
> I was intrigued by this statement and went to look it up.
>
> CPU: Released:
> -
> 80386 1985
On Friday 16 August 2002 15:51, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> -
> The Debian GCC 3.2 Transition Plan
>
> This is a proposal. You will be notified when this is a real plan
>
Nice plan all in all, although I am going to hate the new package names. Some
people talked about av
Is this somekind of demonstration of how much shit is usually filtered, or did
someone open the floodgates by mistake?
On Friday 05 April 2002 08:43, ¹®¿ë¹Ì wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> &nb
>sp;
>http://nancho.starhana.com";> language="javascript" src="
> Re: Build problem on sparc [ogle, assembler error]
On Tuesday 15 January 2002 14:14, Mikael Hedin wrote:
> Hi again!
>
> [Thanks for the help, ia64 now builds fine]
>
> This time it's sparc that don't build. See the build log for details,
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=ogle&ver=0.8.2-4&arch=sparc&stamp=1
>011076373&file=log&as=raw,
>
>
On Wednesday 02 January 2002 23:08, Mikael Hedin wrote:
> Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > - the Norwegian and Swedish keymap (relative to US layout: <4>)
>
> All my keyboards (swedish) have it on AltGr + e. Shift + 4 is still
> the ¤-symbol (currency).
I suppose swedish and danish k
On Thursday 13 September 2001 11:07, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
>
> deutsch de_DE.ISO-8859-1
> françaisfr_FR.ISO-8859-1
> french fr_FR.ISO-8859-1
> german de_DE.ISO-8859-1
> portuguese pt_PT.ISO-8859-1
> spanish es_ES.ISO-8859-1
9 matches
Mail list logo
