On 2025-01-17 Frank Guthausen wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 19:01:51 +0100
> Andreas Metzler wrote:
> >
> > Afaik there is no /known/ blocker except for the
> > libgnupg-interface-perl test error #1088155.
> According to bug report[1] there are failed subtests in 2.4.6 but these
> are not specifi
Your message dated Fri, 17 Jan 2025 15:02:23 -0700
with message-id <1864248.CLbsiaQdQ3@soren-desktop>
and subject line Re: Bug#1093373: general: lots of dependencies missing fro
upgrade on trixie
has caused the Debian Bug report #1093373,
regarding general: lots of dependencies missing fro upgrade
On Friday, January 17, 2025 12:18:15 PM MST Cristobal Lanzagorta wrote:
> Dependency resolution failed:
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies: libkf6konq7: Breaks:
> libkf5konq6 but 4:22.12.3-2+b4 is to be installed
> libkpimaddressbookimportexport5: Depends: kaddressb
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Simon Josefsson
* Package name: golang-github-santhosh-tekuri-jsonschema
Version : 6.0.1-1
Upstream Author : Santhosh Kumar Tekuri
* URL : https://github.com/santhosh-tekuri/jsonschema
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 19:01:51 +0100
Andreas Metzler wrote:
>
> Afaik there is no /known/ blocker except for the
> libgnupg-interface-perl test error #1088155.
According to bug report[1] there are failed subtests in 2.4.6 but these
are not specified. What causes this failures and what needs to be d
Package: general
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: c.lanzagort...@gmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
I am running Debian trixie on a computer which is not my daily driver. after a
ouple of weeks of not using it, I started it up and ran a sudo apt update
command. A lot of updates were installed but there are
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Simon Josefsson
* Package name: golang-github-go-http-utils-headers
Version : 1.0.0-1
Upstream Author : David Cai
* URL : https://github.com/go-http-utils/headers
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Go
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Simon Josefsson
* Package name: golang-github-saracen-fastzip
Version : 0.1.11-1
Upstream Author : Arran Walker
* URL : https://github.com/saracen/fastzip
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Go
Description : opini
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Simon Josefsson
* Package name: golang-github-saracen-zipextra
Version : 0.0~git20220303.0187cb0-1
Upstream Author : Arran Walker
* URL : https://github.com/saracen/zipextra
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Go
Desc
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Simon Josefsson
* Package name: golang-gitlab-gitlab-org-fleeting-fleeting
Version : 0.0~git20250116.5d69933-1
Upstream Author : GitLab B.V.
* URL : https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/fleeting/fleeting
* License : Expat
Prog
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Simon Josefsson
* Package name: golang-github-sourcegraph-conc
Version : 0.3.0-1
Upstream Author : Sourcegraph
* URL : https://github.com/sourcegraph/conc
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Go
Description : Bette
On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 at 15:32:22 +, Wookey wrote:
> Can you explain why this:
> -Wl,--push-flags,--as-needed,-latomic,--pop-flags
> is better than
> -as-needed,-latomic
> I thought --as-needed on its own is sufficicent to avoid dpkg-shlibdeps
> warnings
> about unnecessary linking (because it o
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Simon Josefsson
* Package name: mage
Version : 1.15.0-1
Upstream Author : Mage
* URL : https://github.com/magefile/mage
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Go
Description : a Make/rake-like dev tool using Go
On 2025-01-17 19:43 +0900, Simon Richter wrote:
> In my own packages, I check if libatomic exists, and if it does, I
> unconditionally link if I use any atomics. I also check if the linker
> accepts --push-flags, if it does I generate a
> -Wl,--push-flags,--as-needed,-latomic,--pop-flags sequence,
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Simon Josefsson
* Package name: golang-github-denisbrodbeck-machineid
Version : 1.0.1-1
Upstream Author : Denis Brodbeck
* URL : https://github.com/denisbrodbeck/machineid
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Go
Descri
* Julien Plissonneau Duquène [250116 19:09]:
> Le 2025-01-16 18:36, Niels Thykier a écrit :
> > Putting the scripts into `devscripts` package would imply that
> > `devscripts` becomes part of the `bootstrap essential` set of packages.
>
> I didn't think about that and it effectively rules out dev
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jelmer Vernooij
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: pysequoia
Version : 0.1.25
Upstream Contact: Wiktor Kwapisiewicz
* URL : https://github.com/wiktor-k/pysequoia
* License : Apache
Programming
Hi,
On 1/17/25 17:45, Alexandre Rossi wrote:
Some upstreams have gone through build system tests to assess whether
to build with libatomic or not. Adding -latomic is simpler. I wonder if
the build system configure stage test is overkill.
Yes and no. A lot of the tests are just broken, like "c
On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 at 10:56:39 +0900, Simon Richter wrote:
> basically we'd have to give every -dev package containing
> manual pages a -doc package
In many cases I think this is best-practice anyway, because it takes
the documentation generation toolchain out of the critical path for
bootstrappi
Hi,
> It's not that complex.¹ If you use an atomic, you should also be
> linking with atomic (i.e. -latomic). This is similar to using
> -pthreads if you are using multiple threads, or -lresolv if you use
> gethostbyname()
Some upstreams have gone through build system tests to assess whether
to
20 matches
Mail list logo
