Hi Paul,
On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 02:39:36PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 11/28/24 13:01, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> > IMO it would be good to support dealing with this earlier than
> > later.
>
> And doing it in a way that can be reused by how autopkgtests are run would
> maybe be good too.
C
Hello,
On Thu 28 Nov 2024 at 06:17pm -08, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> In summary: nothing in this is an argument to stop using pristine-tar
> in all packages. I think Theodore Ts'o also laid out pretty well all
> the benefits of pristine-tar and why it was originally developed, and
> those requireme
Hi. I'm trying to create a portable version of bookworm that I can use
on different computers. I'm using a 128 GB external ssd. When I install
Debian on it everything works great until I try to use the drive on
another computer. When I tried it wouldn't boot, and would no longer
boot on the com
Thanks Pirate Praveen for providing the first actual concrete case in
this thread where pristine-tar had some issue!
I noticed an interesting thing about this case:
± origtargz --download-only
pristine-tar: successfully generated
../node-cacache_17.0.3+~cs10.3.7.orig-npmcli-move-file.tar.gz
prist
Thanks Gioele for the stats. I noticed that 90% of the votes came in
the first two days.
In this system you can unvote and put your thumbs up on another
proposal if you want to change your mind now after letting the
question sink in for a few weeks, but please make sure you have voted
only on one
On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 11:05 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 6:02 PM Sami Erjomaa wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 28 Nov 2024 at 15:47, Matthieu Gallien
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> I cannot get links to open when using Nextcloud client (web login page
> >> into your browser or
On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 6:02 PM Sami Erjomaa wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, 28 Nov 2024 at 15:47, Matthieu Gallien
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I cannot get links to open when using Nextcloud client (web login page into
>> your browser or local folders) or I just tested with this command:
>>
>> xdg-open /home//Té
On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 10:35:49AM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
>
> I think this is a good example of us talking past each other in this
> thread: some people question the value of pristine in the first place
> (and I've been compelled by those arguments), and some people argue that
> the cost is
On 14/11/24 08:48, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
Can we agree on calling Debian Enhancement Proposals DEP-N with a dash?
Hi,
I'd say that this discussion reached consensus around "DEP-0".
In this thread 7 people stated their preference for "DEP-0", and 1
person for "DEP0".
The thumbs up counters
On Thu, 28 Nov 2024 at 15:47, Matthieu Gallien
wrote:
>
> I cannot get links to open when using Nextcloud client (web login page
> into your browser or local folders) or I just tested with this command:
>
> xdg-open /home//Téléchargements
>
> This has no effect and I am unsure how best to debug t
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: John Goerzen
* Package name: golang-github-wlynxg-anet
Version : 0.0.5-1
Upstream Author : Wlynxg
* URL : https://github.com/wlynxg/anet
* License : BSD-3-clause
Programming Lang: Go
Description : Network abstract
On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 07:33:27PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> 2024, നവം 28 5:46:47 PM Andrey Rakhmatullin :
> >
> >> Same works with
> >>
> >> pravi@mahishi2:/tmp/node-cacache$ gbp export-orig --pristine-tar
> >
> > Not sure what does this imply.
>
> gbp is able to recreate the orig tars when
2024, നവം 28 5:46:47 PM Andrey Rakhmatullin :
>
>> Same works with
>>
>> pravi@mahishi2:/tmp/node-cacache$ gbp export-orig --pristine-tar
>
> Not sure what does this imply.
gbp is able to recreate the orig tars when origtargz fails. So it is a known
work around.
Hi Helmut,
On 11/28/24 13:01, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
IMO it would be good to support dealing with this earlier than
later.
And doing it in a way that can be reused by how autopkgtests are run
would maybe be good too.
Paul
Dear all,
Thanks a lot for the amazing work to deliver a really nicely experience when
using Debian and KDE Plasma 6 (and many KDE apps).
Thanks a lot also for the communication while doing this !
On samedi 23 novembre 2024 13:14:40 UTC+1 Aurélien COUDERC wrote:
> Dear fellow developers and Plas
* Andrey Rakhmatullin [241128 11:06]:
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 10:49:09AM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > > > As person B I don't want to go hunting for a tarball and place it in
> > > > the right place, I want gbp to re-create it from the pristine-tar
> > > > branch.
> > > Who cares? gbp expor
* Paul Gevers [241128 12:52]:
> Hi,
>
> On 11/28/24 10:56, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> > pristine-tar almost always fail when there are multiple orig tar files.
> > I did not report bugs since the limitation of not working 100% is a
> > known issue already.
>
> I'm surprised to hear this. src:cacti
On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 05:37:41PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> This can now be reproduced with node-cacache
>
> pravi@mahishi2:/tmp$ gbp clone --pristine-tar
> g...@salsa.debian.org:js-team/node-cacache.git
> gbp:info: Cloning from 'g...@salsa.debian.org:js-team/node-cacache.git'
> pravi@mahish
On 11/28/24 5:29 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
On 11/28/24 5:22 PM, Paul Gevers wrote:
Hi,
On 11/28/24 10:56, Pirate Praveen wrote:
pristine-tar almost always fail when there are multiple orig tar
files. I did not report bugs since the limitation of not working 100%
is a known issue already.
On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 10:54:37AM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> I think this demonstrates that we probably have something between 10 and
> 50 packages in unstable that would benefit from a generic parallelism
> limit based on available RAM. Do others agree that this is a problem
> worth solving in
* Helmut Grohne [241128 10:59]:
> I think this demonstrates that we probably have something between 10 and
> 50 packages in unstable that would benefit from a generic parallelism
> limit based on available RAM. Do others agree that this is a problem
> worth solving in a more general way?
Yes. Loo
On 11/28/24 5:22 PM, Paul Gevers wrote:
Hi,
On 11/28/24 10:56, Pirate Praveen wrote:
pristine-tar almost always fail when there are multiple orig tar
files. I did not report bugs since the limitation of not working 100%
is a known issue already.
I'm surprised to hear this. src:cacti is us
Alec Leamas writes:
> Hi,
>
> On 28/11/2024 09:01, Simon Josefsson wrote:
>> The checksums will be different when Debian
>> re-pack upstream's source tarball, but there is still value in recording
>> the upstream tarball used as a basis for creating the Debian source
>> tarball
>
> Personally, th
Hi,
On 11/28/24 10:56, Pirate Praveen wrote:
pristine-tar almost always fail when there are multiple orig tar files.
I did not report bugs since the limitation of not working 100% is a
known issue already.
I'm surprised to hear this. src:cacti is using multiple orig tar files
(2) for several
Hi,
Le 2024-11-28 11:28, Alec Leamas a écrit :
Personally, the few packages I maintain are mostly repacked. Isn't
there also value in storing the hash of the repacked tarball, the thing
actually used?
Not much value, as both the hash and the data would be stored at the
same place (git repo
Dnia Sun, 24 Nov 2024 11:22:18 +, Gioele Barabucci napisał(a):
> On 24/11/24 10:43, nick black wrote:
> > Gioele Barabucci left as an exercise for the reader:
> > > On 23/11/24 09:32, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote:
> > > > But my 2 cents on the topic are: Lets please allow more than as
On 2024-11-25 22:03:32 [+0100], To debian-devel@lists.debian.org wrote:
> On 2024-11-24 21:36:25 [+0100], To debian-devel@lists.debian.org wrote:
> …
>
> I've been looking at cdebootstrap. It is one of the failing. This
> happens in the rules files:
> | ( echo -n "misc:Built-Using="; dpkg-query -
On Thu, 28 Nov 2024 15:06:15 +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> > Often I want to upload it to the archive, that's quite typical in
> > teams: A uploads -1 and B uploads -2 with a bugfix or whatever.
> The hypothetical change in the tools to silently download the tarball from
> the archive will m
Le dimanche 24 novembre 2024, 08:27:31 CET Andrey Rakhmatullin a écrit :
> On Sat, Nov 23, 2024 at 08:31:15PM +, Bastien Roucariès wrote:
> > > > > > B) bump the i386 baseline in Debian to require SSE2, and stop
> > > > > > disabling SSE2 there in rustc> > >
> > > > It will break I suppose ima
Quoting Alec Leamas (2024-11-28 11:28:02)
> Hi,
>
> On 28/11/2024 09:01, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> > The checksums will be different when Debian
> > re-pack upstream's source tarball, but there is still value in recording
> > the upstream tarball used as a basis for creating the Debian source
> > t
Hi,
On 28/11/2024 09:01, Simon Josefsson wrote:
The checksums will be different when Debian
re-pack upstream's source tarball, but there is still value in recording
the upstream tarball used as a basis for creating the Debian source
tarball
Personally, the few packages I maintain are mostly re
Hi,
On 28/11/2024 09:01, Simon Josefsson wrote:
The checksums will be different when Debian
re-pack upstream's source tarball, but there is still value in recording
the upstream tarball used as a basis for creating the Debian source
tarball
Personally, the few packages I maintain are mostly re
On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 10:49:09AM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > > As person B I don't want to go hunting for a tarball and place it in
> > > the right place, I want gbp to re-create it from the pristine-tar
> > > branch.
> > Who cares? gbp export-orig takes care of it, unless you need to actua
2024, നവം 28 3:06:13 PM Simon Josefsson :
> I think this is a good example of us talking past each other in this
> thread: some people question the value of pristine in the first place
> (and I've been compelled by those arguments), and some people argue that
> the cost is small and there are no bu
Hi Guillem and other developers,
I am one of those who builds a lot of different packages with different
requirements and found that picking a good parallel=... value in
DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS is hard. Go too low and your build takes very long. Go
too high and you swap until the OOM killer terminates y
On Thu, 28 Nov 2024 09:41:53 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Nov 27, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > As person B I don't want to go hunting for a tarball and place it in
> > the right place, I want gbp to re-create it from the pristine-tar
> > branch.
> Who cares? gbp export-orig takes care of it, unl
"Theodore Ts'o" writes:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 04:27:37PM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
>> I have never understood what value there is in duplicating the uploaded
>> tarball in the git repository.
>
> The actual cost of storing the pristine tarball is quite small.
I think this is a good examp
On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 09:41:53AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Nov 27, gregor herrmann wrote:
>
> > As person B I don't want to go hunting for a tarball and place it in
> > the right place, I want gbp to re-create it from the pristine-tar
> > branch.
> Who cares? gbp export-orig takes care of
On Nov 27, gregor herrmann wrote:
> As person B I don't want to go hunting for a tarball and place it in
> the right place, I want gbp to re-create it from the pristine-tar
> branch.
Who cares? gbp export-orig takes care of it, unless you need to actually
upload it to the archive.
--
ciao,
Mar
On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 04:27:37PM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> I have never understood what value there is in duplicating the uploaded
> tarball in the git repository.
The actual cost of storing the pristine tarball is quite small. For
example:
commit 91c7ab39337da63371b4814bef2b2aaf85a9e37c
All,
There is discussion in the 'Simpler git workflow for packaging with
upstreamless repositories' thread about the merrits of pristine-tar.
One important value people appear to see is to be able to assert that
orig.tar.gz's integrity can be chained back into some data in the git
repository.
I
41 matches
Mail list logo