On Thu, Sep 26, 2024 at 12:48:03AM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > I would like to ask how painful is a library (libfuse) .so for a
> > > distribution?
> >
> > Not at all, if all revdeps build fine with the bumped version.
> >
> > "I'm assuming that distributions do not recompile packages again
* Guillem Jover [2024-09-25 01:55]:
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, 2024-09-25 at 00:39:10 +0200, Fay Stegerman wrote:
> > * Guillem Jover [2024-09-24 17:45]:
> > > Personally, I think fully migrating from zlib to zlib-ng would sound
> > > great (even for trixie), but I guess we can take it slow if you do not
On Thu, 2024-09-26 at 01:31 +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 09:38:26PM +0200, Bernd Schubert wrote:
> > I would like to ask how painful is a library (libfuse) .so for a
> > distribution?
>
> Not at all, if all revdeps build fine with the bumped version.
>
> "I'm assumi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Arnaud Ferraris
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, aferra...@debian.org,
debian-on-mobile-maintain...@alioth-lists.debian.net
* Package name: rust-gtk-0.18
Version : 0.18.1
* URL : https://github.com/gtk-rs/gtk3-rs
* Lic
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Arnaud Ferraris
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, aferra...@debian.org,
debian-on-mobile-maintain...@alioth-lists.debian.net
* Package name: rust-libphosh
Version : 0.0.2
Upstream Contact: Guido Günther
* URL : https
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Arnaud Ferraris
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, aferra...@debian.org,
debian-on-mobile-maintain...@alioth-lists.debian.net
* Package name: phrog
Version : 0.10.0
Upstream Contact: Sam Day
* URL : https://github.com
On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 09:38:26PM +0200, Bernd Schubert wrote:
> I would like to ask how painful is a library (libfuse) .so for a
> distribution?
Not at all, if all revdeps build fine with the bumped version.
"I'm assuming that distributions do not recompile packages against a new
library versio
Hello,
I would like to ask how painful is a library (libfuse) .so for a
distribution?
As you can see here https://github.com/libfuse/libfuse/pull/1038
there are some arguments not to do so.
The pull request above explains why and adds even more breakage,
when we already have chance for that. But
On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 12:00:47PM +0200, Serafeim (Serafi) Zanikolas wrote:
> hi Jonathan,
>
> On Sun Sep 22, 2024 at 5:05 PM CEST, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> > On Wed Sep 4, 2024 at 8:33 PM BST, Serafeim (Serafi) Zanikolas wrote:
> > > incidentally, lots of Debian native code is in perl, and like
hi Jonathan,
On Sun Sep 22, 2024 at 5:05 PM CEST, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Wed Sep 4, 2024 at 8:33 PM BST, Serafeim (Serafi) Zanikolas wrote:
> > incidentally, lots of Debian native code is in perl, and like it or
> > not, we should allow for, or even encourage [0] (partial) rewrites if
> > we
On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 01:55:17AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> The problem though is, that because the compressed stream is going to
> change, that can make certain test suites fail if we perform this
> switch, which I think would be the main fallout that we'd see from
> this and would need manu
On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 05:45:49PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-09-24 at 15:58:10 +0200, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Obviously it's far too late to do anything with the default for trixie,
> > we might want to evaluate doing something after the release but for now
> > it's too late.
> P
On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 09:36:31AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 03:58:10PM +0200, Mark Brown a écrit :
> >zlib-ng: https://github.com/zlib-ng/zlib-ng
> Hi Mark, just out of curiosity, would the carbon footprint of Debian be
> lower or higher after replacing zlib wit
13 matches
Mail list logo
