On Thu, Sep 26, 2024 at 12:48:03AM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > I would like to ask how painful is a library (libfuse) .so for a > > > distribution? > > > > Not at all, if all revdeps build fine with the bumped version. > > > > "I'm assuming that distributions do not recompile packages against a new > > library version, unless absolutely needed - if I'm right library ABI > > changes cause silent issues." sounds very wrong to me. We always > > recompile packages against a new soname when that is uploaded, and as we > > try to keep packages uptodate a new soname is normally uploaded every time > > it's bumped by the upstream. > > But we *don't* rebuild when there is not an soversion bump, so the > previous unintended ABI changes in libfuse3-3 may well have caused > silent issues for its reverse-dependencies.
Right, when read like that it's correct. -- WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
