On 2024-03-03, RL wrote:
> It does - but also makes me wonder: is this going to affect Debian users
> with 3rd party repositories when they upgrade to trixie? (or is that not
> yet known?)
In theory. I don't know if there are any statistics on 'popular'
3rdparty repositories and their keys. But a
Thanks Steve for uploading a fixed curl on Saturday. Just checking did you
notice amel/armhf are still not building due to secondary issues and n
dependencies?
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=curl
Andreas Metzler writes:
> Hello,
>
> iirc it was recently proposed to add a suggestion to run dpkg --verify
> to the trixie upgrade notes to find missing files due to the usr-merge
> transition. (Cannot find the reference right now).
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2023/12/msg00167.html
B
Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues writes:
>> APT 2.7.13 just landed in unstable and with GnuPG 2.4.5 installed,
>> requires repositories
>> to be signed using one of
>>
>> - RSA keys of at least 2048 bit
>> - Ed25519
>> - Ed448
>>
>> Any other keys will cause warnings. These warnings will beco
On Sat, Mar 02, 2024 at 10:37:33PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 02, 2024 at 06:34:43AM -0700, Antonio Russo wrote:
> > There's a similar issue with versioned dependencies by un-transitioned
> > packages have on non-t64 libraries (e.g., libqt5sql5).
> It's not similar, it's caused
Hi Simon Quiqley, (CC: debian-devel)
I'm trying to figure out how to get the hardinfo2 - release 2.0.12 into
debian repository.
hardinfo2 is a community fork of hardinfo and should continue as
hardinfo package, currently maintained in debian by Simon Quiqley.
Salvo Tomaselli suggested to do I
On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 06:28:50PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> When I want to fix autopkgtests for a package on a particular architecture, I
> currently
> see no way to run autopkgtests before I dput since porter boxes do not
> provide root
> access which autopkgtest needs.
Not exactly an answe
On Sun, 03 Mar 2024 at 22:52:26 +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> If I want to run tests with another package (say a test dependency) that I
> fixed
> locally on a particular arch (which is not amd64) -- how doI run autopkgtests
> with
> this combo on a porter machine?
Unfortunately, the general answ
On Sun, Mar 03, 2024 at 06:09:47PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 01-03-2024 1:58 p.m., Nilesh Patra wrote:
> > Have you found any way around these?
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/mbanck/dd-autopkgtest/
Thanks, I will use this for autopkgtests.
This however also only partially solves the issue for
> Can we also consider ${*:Built-Using} as typically seen in
> ${sphinxdoc:Built-Using}?
> This is another field that people keep forget adding. While missing
> this field is not severely harmful, having it automatically handled
> would be beneficial.
Automatic expansion of ${*:(Static-)Built-Usi
Hi,
On 01-03-2024 1:58 p.m., Nilesh Patra wrote:
Have you found any way around these?
https://salsa.debian.org/mbanck/dd-autopkgtest/
Alternative, probably not the best solution, but until better ones are
found (and as long it's not too much used): Antonio and I offer DD's
access to testbed
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stephen Kitt
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libiir
Version : 1.9.4
Upstream Author : Bernd Porr
* URL : https://github.com/berndporr/iir1
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: C++
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alan M Varghese
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, a...@digistorm.in
* Package name: libhyprlang
Version : 0.4.1
Upstream Contact: vaxerski
* URL : https://github.com/hyprwm/hyprlang
* License : GPL
Programm
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Birger Schacht
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, bir...@debian.org
* Package name: way-shell
Version : no release yet
Upstream Contact: Louis DeLosSantos
* URL : https://github.com/ldelossa/way-shell/
* License
Hi
It seems the discussion on this topic has settled, so I am now doing a
summary of the discussion as I understand it.
* Generally, the original proposal seems to have been received
favorably at a conceptual level.
* Several people requested the scope to be expanded to extra fields.
15 matches
Mail list logo
