On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 8:15 PM mooff wrote:
> I might have been imprecise in saying 'cloud' images, but I mean:
> $ docker run -it --rm debian:bullseye bash
...
> > I think that `reportbug cloud.debian.org` would be the > place to
> discuss this
I don't think the docker images are produced by t
Dnia Mon, 13 Sep 2021 20:59:25 +0100, mooff napisał(a):
> I might have been imprecise in saying 'cloud' images, but I mean:
>
> $ docker run -it --rm debian:bullseye bash
> root@3ee3e7c4ce62:/# ps
> bash: ps: command not found
> root@3ee3e7c4ce62:/#
Then, https://hub.docker.com/_/debian says:
"Wh
On Fri, 10 Sep 2021, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 09:01:31AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> >...
> > I think dnspython's previous approach was correct: just like glibc, musl,
> > and
> > other libraries, if /etc/resolv.conf is missing they should treat that as
> > though it specifie
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 08:59:25PM +0100, mooff wrote:
> I might have been imprecise in saying 'cloud' images, but I mean:
>
> $ docker run -it --rm debian:bullseye bash
> root@3ee3e7c4ce62:/# ps
> bash: ps: command not found
> root@3ee3e7c4ce62:/#
>
> > I think that `reportbug cloud.debian.org`
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 08:59:25PM +0100, mooff wrote:
> I might have been imprecise in saying 'cloud' images, but I mean:
>
> $ docker run -it --rm debian:bullseye bash
> root@3ee3e7c4ce62:/# ps
> bash: ps: command not found
> root@3ee3e7c4ce62:/#
That is not a cloud image.
> > I think that `re
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Doug Torrance
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, dtorra...@piedmont.edu,
debia...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: r-cran-partitions
Version : 1.10.2
Upstream Author : Robin K. S. Hankin
* URL : https://github.com/Rob
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mohammed Bilal mailto:mdbi...@disroot.org)>
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
(mailto:debian-devel@lists.debian.org)
* Package name : node-is-blob
Version : 2.1.0
Upstream Author : Sindre Sorhus mailto:sindresor...@gmail.com)> (sindresorhus.com)
*
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 08:38:52PM +, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> Le lun. 13 sept. 2021 à 20:24, Adrian Bunk a écrit :
> > On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 08:19:31PM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
>...
> > > The regressions are significant though: if packages can’t stay
> > > cross-satisfiable for Debian c
Le lun. 13 sept. 2021 à 20:24, Adrian Bunk a écrit :
>
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 08:19:31PM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> >...
> > For Wine (and even a wider MinGW-w64
> > ecosystem) we don’t need all that many source packages to be
> > cross-satisfiable for the whole endeavour to be useful...
>
>
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 08:19:31PM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
>...
> For Wine (and even a wider MinGW-w64
> ecosystem) we don’t need all that many source packages to be
> cross-satisfiable for the whole endeavour to be useful...
But you would still need to create and maintain the whole
infrastruc
I might have been imprecise in saying 'cloud' images, but I mean:
$ docker run -it --rm debian:bullseye bash
root@3ee3e7c4ce62:/# ps
bash: ps: command not found
root@3ee3e7c4ce62:/#
> I think that `reportbug cloud.debian.org` would be the > place to
discuss this
Thanks Paul. I wasn't sure whe
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 08:19:31PM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> Is the process documented anywhere? Or does one simply pick a failure from
> http://crossqa.debian.net and figure out what’s going wrong (and hope that
> pulling the threads doesn’t reveal a monster...)?
That describes the process qui
On Sun, 12 Sep 2021 20:54:56 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 12, 2021 at 07:03:54PM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > On Sun, 12 Sep 2021 19:20:16 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > On Sun, Sep 12, 2021 at 05:31:41PM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > > >...
> > > > While one could imagine addi
On Sun, Sep 12, 2021 at 09:33:54PM +0100, mooff wrote:
> IMO, many human hours will be lost by the decision not to include procps in
> the default cloud images.
>
> I understand it could be a security measure, but maybe stubs could be
> offered which name the package we want (procps)
>
> Tracing
On Mon, 13 Sep 2021 17:39:25 +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> I believe I can speak with my "main cross building porter" hat on.
>
> On Sun, Sep 12, 2021 at 01:57:44PM +, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> > They are a full color gradiant between:
> > - freestanding arches pure cross compile without any
I believe I can speak with my "main cross building porter" hat on.
On Sun, Sep 12, 2021 at 01:57:44PM +, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> They are a full color gradiant between:
> - freestanding arches pure cross compile without any depends except arch:all
> - partial cross built arch
> - partial ar
On Sun, Sep 12, 2021 at 03:10:27AM +, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 6:03 PM David Kalnischkies wrote:
> > Because this thread started with the idea to switch the default of d-i
> > and co to another URI. If you target only apt then you still need
> > a solution for d-i and a way to
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Arnaud Ferraris
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, arnaud.ferra...@gmail.com
* Package name: feedbackd-device-themes
Version : 0.0.20210909
Upstream Author : Purism SPC
* URL : https://source.puri.sm/Librem5/feedbackd-d
18 matches
Mail list logo
