Dnia Mon, 13 Sep 2021 20:59:25 +0100, mooff napisał(a): > I might have been imprecise in saying 'cloud' images, but I mean: > > $ docker run -it --rm debian:bullseye bash > root@3ee3e7c4ce62:/# ps > bash: ps: command not found > root@3ee3e7c4ce62:/#
Then, https://hub.docker.com/_/debian says: "Where to file issues: https://github.com/debuerreotype/docker-debian-artifacts/issues"; And there we have: https://github.com/debuerreotype/docker-debian-artifacts/issues/20 -- "Missing procps package or feature?" > > I think that `reportbug cloud.debian.org` would be the > place to discuss > this > > Thanks Paul. I wasn't sure where to send it. > > On Mon, Sep 13 2021 at 11:21:29 -0700, Noah Meyerhans <no...@debian.org> > wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 12, 2021 at 09:33:54PM +0100, mooff wrote: > > > IMO, many human hours will be lost by the decision not to include > > > procps in > > > the default cloud images. > > > > > > I understand it could be a security measure, but maybe stubs could > > > be > > > offered which name the package we want (procps) > > > > > > Tracing my third call to apt-file search bin/ps ;) > > > > What cloud images are you looking at? The images built by the Debian > > cloud team *do* include procps. See the manifests for (some of) the > > current bullseye images, all of which indicate that procps is included: > > > > https://cloud.debian.org/images/cloud/bullseye/latest/debian-11-ec2-arm64.json > > https://cloud.debian.org/images/cloud/bullseye/latest/debian-11-generic-amd64.json > > https://cloud.debian.org/images/cloud/bullseye/latest/debian-11-azure-amd64.json > > -- Michał Politowski Talking has been known to lead to communication if practiced carelessly.
