Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues:
> Quoting Michael Biebl (2021-07-19 15:10:42)
>> [...]
>>
>> According to
>> apt-file search -x '^/(lib|bin|sbin)'
>> on my Debian sid/amd64 system, we have 1747 packages shipping 24583
>> files in those directories.
>
> more precisely, on amd64 unstable:
>
> /b
On 20/07/2021 00:09, Wookey wrote:
On 2021-07-14 20:05 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
Am 14.07.21 um 19:54 schrieb Paul Sutton:
Hi All
Am I right in thinking that xfce4-notes has been removed? I have
installed xfce4-goodies and it isn't installed.
From unstable/testing that is correct.
See
On 2021-07-14 20:05 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 14.07.21 um 19:54 schrieb Paul Sutton:
> > Hi All
> >
> > Am I right in thinking that xfce4-notes has been removed? I have
> > installed xfce4-goodies and it isn't installed.
>
> From unstable/testing that is correct.
>
> See
> https://tracke
Hello Simon,
That's an awesome reply, thank you very much for having the time to
write all of this and adding the links, I have found the Steam runtime
bit particularly interesting.
> (Disclosure: I work for Collabora, and I'm currently working on the
> Steam Runtime.)
If you're ever feeling lik
(Disclosure: I work for Collabora, and I'm currently working on the
Steam Runtime.)
On Sat, 17 Jul 2021 at 13:48:32 +0100, Samuel Henrique wrote:
> As some of you already seem, we have very good news for the Linux
> gaming community, although somewhat bad for Debian:
...
> https://www.steamdeck.co
On 16194 March 1977, Simon McVittie wrote:
Would it be feasible for dak to have a list of binary package name
regexes mapped to a source package and a section/priority, and
auto-accept
packages from the given source package that match the regex, assigning
the given section/priority, without ma
On Mon, 19 Jul 2021 at 02:25:16 +, Paul Wise wrote:
> BTW, the Valve Arch Linux overlay thing appears to be here:
>
> https://repo.steampowered.com/arch/valveaur/
FYI, that's an overlay for "upstream" Arch, for Arch users who want to
try out Mesa and kernel patches that are not yet mainline -
On Mon, 19 Jul 2021 at 16:41:42 +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote:
> Should I rather file bugs with patches against individual packages
> to move their files from /(sbin|bin|lib)/ to /usr/(sbin|bin|lib)/
As discussed in previous iterations of the ongoing merged-/usr megathread,
I don't
On Mon, 19 Jul 2021 15:19:32 +0200, Michael Biebl
wrote:
>Am 19.07.21 um 07:23 schrieb Marc Haber:
>> I am NOT looking forward having to manually convert legacy systems to
>> merged /usr and I do sincerely hope that Debian will choose a way to
>> get away without throwing away systems that have ju
Quoting Michael Biebl (2021-07-19 15:10:42)
> Am 19.07.21 um 03:36 schrieb Guillem Jover:
> > What I've also said multiple times, is that
> > merged-usr-via-moves-and-symlink-farms could have been implemented in
> > a fully automated way, by debhelper, w/o requiring any maintainer scripts,
> > all
Am 19.07.21 um 07:23 schrieb Marc Haber:
I am NOT looking forward having to manually convert legacy systems to
merged /usr and I do sincerely hope that Debian will choose a way to
get away without throwing away systems that have just a small /, still
supporting a dedicated /usr as long as it's m
Hi Guillem
Am 19.07.21 um 03:36 schrieb Guillem Jover:
What I've also said multiple times, is that
merged-usr-via-moves-and-symlink-farms could have been implemented in
a fully automated way, by debhelper, w/o requiring any maintainer scripts,
all with full cooperation and managed by dpkg, with
On Mon, 19 Jul 2021 at 11:33:49 +0200, Stephan Lachnit wrote:
> We could start with collecting the packages that install to /bin*
> instead of /usr/bin, and adjust the packaging so that they don't do
> that. [...] At this point, it shouldn't
> matter if you run a merged usr system or not, or am I f
On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 3:37 AM Guillem Jover wrote:
> What I've also said multiple times, is that
> merged-usr-via-moves-and-symlink-farms could have been implemented in
> a fully automated way, by debhelper, w/o requiring any maintainer scripts,
> all with full cooperation and managed by dpkg, w
On Jul 19, Marc Haber wrote:
> I am NOT looking forward having to manually convert legacy systems to
> merged /usr and I do sincerely hope that Debian will choose a way to
> get away without throwing away systems that have just a small /, still
> supporting a dedicated /usr as long as it's mounte
15 matches
Mail list logo