Control: reassign -1 debian-installer
Hello,
The installer including firmware is probably easier to use if firmware
is needed during the install.
On Vi, 15 ian 21, 20:04:44, Dave Dyer wrote:
> package: installer
>
> Installing on an old x86 cpu which requires "non free" drivers, the
> installe
Hi Helmut, and everybody,
I have just uploaded media-types 4.0.0, which I hope removes all
regressions regarding duplicated file extensions in the `application/`
types.
Interestingly, there has been duplicates in our `mime.types` file for a
long time, but never within the `application/` type. Se
On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 03:10:46AM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 09:19:37PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> > On Fri, 15 Jan 2021 21:45:35 +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> > >We already tell people to enable non-free
> > >and check everything they install as that's the onl
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-print...@lists.debian.org
Package name: pappl
Version : 1.0.1
Upstream Author : Michael R Sweet
URL : hhttps://www.msweet.org/pappl
License : Apache Li
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 09:19:37PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jan 2021 21:45:35 +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin
> wrote:
> >We already tell people to enable non-free
> >and check everything they install as that's the only option we provide.
>
> And those people usually react by taking their
On Fri, 15 Jan 2021 21:45:35 +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin
wrote:
>We already tell people to enable non-free
>and check everything they install as that's the only option we provide.
And those people usually react by taking their choice and install ...
... a different distribution.
Do we want this?
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 09:35:01AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> The point is to make things easier for our users. Right now, we're doing
> that for you but not for the users who don't care whether firmware is
> non-free. I think the idea is that we should consider making things
> easier for bo
On Vi, 15 ian 21, 09:35:01, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> I agree with the original proposal to make it easier to find an installer
> that works (technically) on a broader range of systems, while
> simultaneously being irritated that non-free nonsense is required for most
> commercially-available system
On 2021-01-15 09:35:01 -0800 (-0800), Russ Allbery wrote:
> Jeremy Stanley writes:
>
> > Yes, I get that. I don't mind having to go out of my way to update
> > non-free firmware even if it means separately downloading with another
> > machine and sneaker-netting on removable media, it helps keep
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stephen Gelman
* Package name: kubecolor
Version : 0.0.9-1
Upstream Author : Hidetatsu Yaginuma
* URL : https://github.com/dty1er/kubecolor
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Go
Description : colorizes kubectl ou
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Timo Röhling
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, t...@gaussglocke.de
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: cyclonedds
Version : 0.7.0
Upstream Author : ADLINK Technology Limited and others
* URL
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 09:35:01AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I agree with the original proposal to make it easier to find an installer
> that works (technically) on a broader range of systems, while
> simultaneously being irritated that non-free nonsense is required for most
> commercially-avail
Jeremy Stanley writes:
> Yes, I get that. I don't mind having to go out of my way to update
> non-free firmware even if it means separately downloading with another
> machine and sneaker-netting on removable media, it helps keep me honest
> about what's getting installed and what's necessary (or
On 2021-01-15 21:45:35 +0500 (+0500), Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 04:39:47PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> > Thanks for the insightful suggestion! Can we also just get rid of
> > non-free and contrib in that case and put everything in main? If
> > people don't want non-free
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 04:39:47PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> Thanks for the insightful suggestion! Can we also just get rid of
> non-free and contrib in that case and put everything in main? If
> people don't want non-free software they can just not install it,
> right? Problem solved apparent
On 2021-01-15 17:27:56 +0100 (+0100), Ansgar wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-01-15 at 15:30 +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> > On 2021-01-15 12:11:06 +0100 (+0100), Emanuele Rocca wrote:
> > [...]
> > > So the current situation is that we make an active effort to
> > > produce two different types of installati
On Fri, 2021-01-15 at 15:30 +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2021-01-15 12:11:06 +0100 (+0100), Emanuele Rocca wrote:
> [...]
> > So the current situation is that we make an active effort to
> > produce two different types of installation media: one that works
> > for all users, and one broken for
On 2021-01-15 12:11:06 +0100 (+0100), Emanuele Rocca wrote:
[...]
> So the current situation is that we make an active effort to
> produce two different types of installation media: one that works
> for all users, and one broken for most laptops.
[...]
The one you say "works for all users" doesn't
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Magnus Hagdorn
* Package name: r-other-inla
Version : 20.03.17
Upstream Author :
* URL : https://www.r-inla.org/home
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: R
Description : integrated nested Laplace approximation
Full
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 12:11:06PM +0100, Emanuele Rocca wrote:
> So the current situation is that we make an active effort to produce two
> different types of installation media: one that works for all users, and
> one broken for most laptops.
(not just laptops, many other user machines as well)
Replying: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=979685
Hello Andrei,
I'm not a Debian packager, not even a Debian user.
I'm a Mageia user (and was a Mageia packager in the past)
This is indeed a request to package, I will not be able to do it
myself, but if I can help in any way plea
On Tue, 2021-01-12 at 19:30 +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> Ah, yes I also wonder how much the world will improve
> if non-free would be split in non-free and non-free-firmware.
> Currently is non free firmware a hugh promoter of non-free in
> /etc/apt/sources.list
I proposed moving non-free firmwa
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Kartik Mistry
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, kar...@debian.org
* Package name: lexd
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Daniel Swanson ,
Nick Howell
* URL : https://apertium.org/
* License
Package: wnpp
Owner: Ole Streicher
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-as...@lists.debian.org,
debian-j...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: starjava-tjoin
Version : 1.0+github
Upstream Author : Mark Taylor
* URL : https://github.co
On 12/01 05:14, Sven Joachim wrote:
> Provide a way to discover the working netinst with non-free firmware,
> right now it seems to be impossible to find.
>
> The official netinst image advertised on the homepage is for servers and
> virtual machines only. How is an average user of Windows or eve
25 matches
Mail list logo
